all 39 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 70 points 5 days ago (3 children)

The guy liberals will tell us we have to like or it means we hate queer people btw

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    I'm happy to be everyone's queer friend who will not under literally any circumstance vote for Newsome, so feel free to name drop me when libs say that

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 61 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Can't wait for shitlibs to gaslight us why this is actually good for us and that we should be thankful to have such a caring future president like Gavin agony

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    “You tankies just don’t understand tactics! It’s strategic to make these appeals to moderate conservatives, who will definitely not see this move as shifty, opportunistic, or triangulated.”

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 5 days ago

    Second lib joins the conversation: "So true! Leftists just can't stop doing purity tests. Why would you let a tiny fraction of the population stand in the way of voting for someone you agree with 99%? You need to be pragmatic. Vote Gavin into office first and then you can try to push him more to the left.

    Btw, I'm as leftist as they come, but I completely agree with Trump on the trans issue, so I will fight tooth and nail to prevent you from distracting Gavin's good work with your identity politics."

    debatejak

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 52 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    “WhAt WoUlD tHe RePuBlIcAnS tHiN-“

    They will vote Republican anyway and call you far-left! Just go and be a republican since you clearly want to be one!

    Just one fucking state I want to be a haven for social pariahs like me, and then flip off the rest of the country for simply being too stupid to understand it’s wrong to kill people just because they’re different.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 5 days ago

    If it's a choice between a genuine Republican, and a Republican in Democratic clothing, the people will choose the genuine article, every time

    -Harry Truman (a person we dont like agreeing w lmao but who was unfortunately completely correct here)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 43 points 5 days ago (9 children)

    An example of how Blue MAGA scumfuckers on reddit-logo are trying to defend this: https://old.reddit.com/r/democrats/comments/1wnmx7f/gavin_newsom_vetoes_bill_that_would_have/

    Nuance! He already protects trans people! The bill was worthless anyway! maybe-later-honey

    barbara-pit

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 5 days ago (7 children)

    Every day I grow more understanding of Stalin's purges.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    Whenever anti-communists or lumpenproletariat accuse Stalin of killing 4 gorillion people, just remember the people he killed were all people like in that Reddit thread defending stuff like this and worse.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    "I know that after my death a pile of rubbish will be heaped on my grave, but the wind of History will sooner or later sweep it away without mercy." stalin-pipe

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago

    Like original_name37 is correcting them and getting downvoted because these people just don't care about us. All their rhetoric about nuance and strategy is just what they tell themselves to ignore their own depravity. To draw an extreme comparison, this is like someone living just outside a Nazi death camp and telling themselves the bangs and wails on the other side of the wall are just the noise of normal factory work. The acrid smoke rising from the crematorium is just regular factory exhaust nothing more.

    Had another infuriating encounter with this lovely gentleman from terf island yesterday: CW (transphobia) and (racism)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 19 points 5 days ago*

    Like 80% of people will just shriek "criminalzzzz!!!!" completely uncritically. I don't know how the fuck equating legality with morality is so pervasive, I thought this was something we all did in like middle school. Hey dipshit, the law is unjust.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 5 days ago (3 children)

    His kill-the-unhoused stances already disqualified him.

    Idk what his stance on the Palestinian Genocide is but he's a liberal darling so probably terrible, can anyone confirm?

    Throwing trans people under the bus? Cherry on top

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Idk what his stance on the Palestinian Genocide is but he's a liberal darling so probably terrible, can anyone confirm?

    He called Israel an apartheid and then later said he "regretted" saying it. I don't think he's called the genocide a genocide though.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 42 points 5 days ago
    [–] 32 points 5 days ago (1 child)

    Common Gavin L

    Remember when libs were telling us that if we don't support him, it's because we secretely hate Trans kids? Well get ready for the follow-up "Gavin Betrays His Voters: Presidential Campaign Edition"

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 days ago

    Liberals on bsky have now flipped to accusing trans people of being racist (specifically accusing them of not caring about black people and immigrants targeted up by Ice).
    I guess they realised the "x group we are genociding hates gays so don't feel bad about them" makes them racist as hell so this is their attempt at pivoting.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 38 points 5 days ago*

    2028 is going to suck so bad.

  • source
  • [–] 39 points 5 days ago

    Vote blue no matter who, because no matter who you vote for they're all coming for you

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 5 days ago

    California is supposed to be one of the "better" states for trans stuff, right? What a loser.


    ⓘ Remember to enable JPEG-XL support in your browser, even on your phone!

  • source
  • [–] 33 points 5 days ago

    Gruesome Gavin the Homeless Terminator sucks ass, the unfortunate liberal that tells me I “must” vote for him is gonna get so many cuss words thrown at them it’ll be like when the cartoon swears so much the cartoonist just starts drawing a dark cloud instead of symbols

  • source
  • [–] 27 points 5 days ago

    blue maga mfer

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 days ago

    Vetoing a bill sponsored by Planner Parenthood should be political suicide in California.

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 5 days ago

    Having rights is genuinely over forever, isn't it

  • source
  • Tankies once again carrying the burden of being right all the time

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 5 days ago (2 children)

    What a fucking piece of shit. This bill is specifically so that, in the unlikely event that the Republican candidate for governor (who specifically stated that he would extradite abortion providers) is elected to succeed him this November, he won't be able to do that.

    “While I share the author’s views on the importance of protecting these important healthcare services, extradition is an exclusively executive function,” wrote Newsom. “When discretionary, that discretion is appropriately placed with the Governor. I am troubled by the precedent that would be set if an outgoing administration agreed with the Legislature to erode the executive authority of an incoming Governor based on their shared policy preferences, regardless of how righteous and well-intended those actions may be.”

    I don't even fucking understand what he's trying to say here.

    Again, what a fucking piece of shit. Fuck him. His sister makes terrible fucking music too. Eat shit.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 5 days ago*

    I am troubled by the precedent that would be set if an outgoing administration agreed with the Legislature to erode the executive authority of an incoming Governor based on their shared policy preferences

    Sounds like he's troubled by the idea of anything of fundamentally changing anything for the rest of his term, so he's vetoing everything instead?

  • source
  • parent
  • I don’t even fucking understand what he’s trying to say here.

    He is against anything that would diminish the power of the office, and since it's Gruesome Newsome most likely specifically against anything that would diminish the power of his office to opress people.

  • source
  • parent
  • Navin Gruesome plans to switch parties and run as a Republican, apparently.

  • source
  • if he shows his rat face around here its on sight

  • source