top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 178 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (6 children)

What he means is:

"You should keep buying our expensive product as fast as possible, no matter what anyone else says!"

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 103 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    "buy my shit buy it buy it buy it"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 66 points 3 weeks ago (9 children)

    While I do see AI usage as a danger, I don't see an AI gaining super intelligence within 3 years and killing everyone.

    The pollution from the data centers is the bigger threat as is the cognitive decline of the users.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago* (2 children)

    The problem isn't AI gaining intelligence, it's allowing AI to have agency and then it gets an potentially dangerous prompt that leads it to hack into, just for the sake of being funny, a bunch of places to delete the entire stock market. As funny as it would be it would lead to a complete economic collapse. I'd actually feel safer if it did have actual intelligence. We're talking about a technology where if you have broken unit tests (software term meaning a certain set of tests the code has to pass to be considered functional) and you tell AI to "fix the unit tests" there's a non-zero chance of it just deleting the tests and saying it's fixed.

    AI is dangerous not in the way movies present it where it gains sentience and wipes us out. It's dangerous in the opposite way where it doesn't have intelligence and wipes us out because it doesn't understand it's doing something that's going to kill us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 55 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    TBF, he's right. AI won't destroy the world. Humans using AI will.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 42 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Something tells me that he might not be completely objective...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    We should go as fast as we can

    Stockton Rush vibes.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 36 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    No, the gold rush isn't over, says shovel salesman.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 3 weeks ago

    You’re so close to the gold bro, just buy a couple more shovels.

  • source
  • [–] 26 points 3 weeks ago (13 children)

    I agree with him purely because an LLM is not intelligent, any time you hear about it doing something like hacking on its own it was a marketing stunt

  • source
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    I didn't read this as AI sentients but as AI killing the world through its irresponsible use of resources like water and electricity.

    Basically, he's saying "I need to get as rich as possible so that I can have enough money to survive the water wars."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago
    [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Shockingly the CEO of the company that would benefit from regulatory capture of AI says that, and the CEO of the company that would suffer from regulatory capture of AI says this. What a shock...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)
    load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 3 weeks ago

    The time to trust what anyone with a profit motive says is long over.

  • source
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    "Man who has funded scam says scam must continue unabated despite warnings"

    Its almost like nvidia has so much imaginary valuation tied up in the whole AI bullshit that they know when it crashes, it could very likely take nvidia with it.

    and I, personally, think it will be a good day for nvidia to die as a company. They've been at the forefront of making shit worse for customers for well over a decade now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    Shovel and casket maker says there is nothing to worry about. Now help me lift this dead body. Use your legs.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    Just another big talking fool, saying unknown things with confidence.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago

    lol the guys entire business model is selling the components that make this bullshit spin. Of course he would say that. His opinion isn’t worth shit.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    Ah yes, the "Legitimate" Lord Neverwinter wants us all to stay and watch the games until the end. There will be a gift for each of us.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    That's a crack in the AI-bros alliance.

    On one side, AI companies running out of cash for their expansion race and looking for excuses to pause everything but more importantly everyone else with them.

    On the other side, the only corp that actually sells something, invested shitload of money in the AI hype and needs making profit on hardware at an insane rates to recoup his investments otherwise he's toast.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 3 weeks ago

    He personally makes more money this way, so this is not a surprise.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    His denial actually makes the warnings more credible. For a while I was worried why they'd all agree.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    I seriously doubt it as well. Chances AI destroys humanity within the next 3 years and 3 months should be close to zero. The conclusion, though! Why would we do that if it destroys us for example by 2034?!??

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago

    NVIDIA recently acquired HuggingFace for a huge sum. It makes perfect sense that Huang would say something like that.

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago* (1 child)

    Just watched a majority report video, the gist was the A.I. companies want regulations to prevent other companies (like say from China) competing in the US, so they're spreading this b.s. alarmist drivel about how we're 6 months away from skynet.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    I just wanted to play fucking video games, not fund eugenics

    Jensen, take your stupid fucking jacket, shove it up your ass

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 3 weeks ago

    Jensen Huang should be forced to wear a polo shirt whenever he does this shit. I genuinely think he’d stop.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    0% chance by 2030.

    But a 100% chance by 2031.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Wow, so good to have a guarantee of at least 4 years... 🙄

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago

    Huang, Pictured here trying to suck his own dick, says 'Buy more of my product. I'll never get off until I destroy the world.'

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)
    load more comments (3 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›