top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 7 points 7 hours ago

Shovel and casket maker says there is nothing to worry about. Now help me lift this dead body. Use your legs.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 6 hours ago

    Just like economists...every AI guru has a different opinion.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

    AI doomerism is designed to distract us on genAI's real problems.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago

    I feel like both positions are wrong (and obvious attempts to either make this product more impressive than it currently is or avoid meaningful regulations). There is not currently evidence that LLMs pose such an existential threat to humanity, but that's not to say there won't be.

    A much bigger threat as it stands is these companies having such terribly safety processes that their technology keeps acting in unexpected ways. These are not companies that should have a financial stake in energy infrastructure, not to mention the further consolidation of power by these douchebag billionaires.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

    as fast as we can

    This does let him sell the most gpus. Must be coincidence.

    There are many issues with too fast.

    1. financial crisis from overspending. There is myth that there is GPU capacity shortage. A recent model, Jev, is a low compute cheaper way to do classification

    2. continued scarcity of useful products/ram

    3. end result of government bailing them all out with compute for military and surveillance

    4. ...

    5. Profit from end of world.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (2 children)

    Chinas T800 bot 18 September in San Francisco vs human fighter

    https://youtube.com/shorts/J1OVezavKwc

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 30 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

    No, the gold rush isn't over, says shovel salesman.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Shockingly the CEO of the company that would benefit from regulatory capture of AI says that, and the CEO of the company that would suffer from regulatory capture of AI says this. What a shock...

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 13 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    Single handedly made leather jackets feel infinitely lamer.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 16 hours ago

    Jensen Huang should be forced to wear a polo shirt whenever he does this shit. I genuinely think he’d stop.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 15 hours ago

    Huang, Pictured here trying to suck his own dick, says 'Buy more of my product. I'll never get off until I destroy the world.'

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 15 hours ago (1 child)

    Did this dildo realize that 2030 is only just over 3 years away?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 19 hours ago (1 child)

    That's a crack in the AI-bros alliance.

    On one side, AI companies running out of cash for their expansion race and looking for excuses to pause everything but more importantly everyone else with them.

    On the other side, the only corp that actually sells something, invested shitload of money in the AI hype and needs making profit on hardware at an insane rates to recoup his investments otherwise he's toast.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

    Just watched a majority report video, the gist was the A.I. companies want regulations to prevent other companies (like say from China) competing in the US, so they're spreading this b.s. alarmist drivel about how we're 6 months away from skynet.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

    "Man who has funded scam says scam must continue unabated despite warnings"

    Its almost like nvidia has so much imaginary valuation tied up in the whole AI bullshit that they know when it crashes, it could very likely take nvidia with it.

    and I, personally, think it will be a good day for nvidia to die as a company. They've been at the forefront of making shit worse for customers for well over a decade now.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 162 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (4 children)

    What he means is:

    "You should keep buying our expensive product as fast as possible, no matter what anyone else says!"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)

    Gee, I’m sure he has a completely unbiased opinion here. In other news, rapists don’t think roofies are a problem.

  • source
  • [–] 17 points 1 day ago
    [–] 5 points 21 hours ago (1 child)

    0% chance by 2030.

    But a 100% chance by 2031.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 64 points 1 day ago (9 children)

    While I do see AI usage as a danger, I don't see an AI gaining super intelligence within 3 years and killing everyone.

    The pollution from the data centers is the bigger threat as is the cognitive decline of the users.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (9 replies)
    [–] 95 points 1 day ago (4 children)

    "buy my shit buy it buy it buy it"

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 41 points 1 day ago (7 children)

    Something tells me that he might not be completely objective...

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 26 points 1 day ago (10 children)

    I agree with him purely because an LLM is not intelligent, any time you hear about it doing something like hacking on its own it was a marketing stunt

  • source
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 53 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    TBF, he's right. AI won't destroy the world. Humans using AI will.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 2 points 19 hours ago

    W...w...wh...what about after 2030?

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›