Per Wikipedia: "Vegetables are edible parts of plants that are consumed by humans or other animals as food. This original meaning is still commonly used, and is applied to plants collectively to refer to all edible plant matter, including flowers, fruits, stems, leaves, roots, and seeds."

all 37 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 39 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

Fruit - botanical term

vegetable - culinary term exclusively

Though, fruit also has an alternative culinary meaning.

Interesting lil fact: The question of whether the tomato is a fruit or a vegetable found its way into the United States Supreme Court in 1893. The court ruled unanimously in Nix v. Hedden that a tomato is correctly identified as, and thus taxed as, a vegetable, for the purposes of the Tariff of 1883 on imported produce. However, the court acknowledged that, botanically speaking, a tomato is a fruit.[9]

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vegetable

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    in portuguese, fruit (botanical) and fruit (culinary) are 2 distinct words, respectively are, "fruto" and "fruta"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    Interesting little fact: a factoid is not a little fact, it's something that appears like a fact but is in fact false. Think like how an android is a fake human, a factoid is a fake fact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 22 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    They're both.
    Vegetable is a food category, fruit is a biological category (part of the plant).

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 month ago (4 children)

    Here's the thing. You said a "fruits are vegetables."

    Are they edible parts of plants? Yes. No one's arguing that.

    As someone who is a scientist who studies food, I am telling you, specifically, in science, no one calls fruits vegetables. If you want to be "specific" like you said, then you shouldn't either. They're not the same thing.

    If you're saying "fruits" you're referring to the botanical grouping of fructus, which includes things from nuts to tomatoes to pumpkins.

    So your reasoning for calling fruits a vegetable is because random people "call the edible parts vegetables?" Let's get roots and leaves in there, then, too.

    Also, calling someone a human or an ape? It's not one or the other, that's not how taxonomy works. They're both. A vegetable is a vegetable and a member of the frouit grouping. But that's not what you said. You said a fruits are vegetables, which is not true unless you're okay with calling all edible plant parts vegetables, which means you'd call seeds, bark, and parts vegetables, too. Which you said you don't.

    It's okay to just admit you're wrong, you know?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    This kind of debate always comes down to a mismatch between botanical and culinary terminology. The real question is which of those contexts are you speaking in.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago*

    it's kinda like how people insist that paradoxes are some wild freaky thing, when in reality it's just "we don't know what would happen because it's not real and doesn't make sense in reality as we know it".
    Or like "did you know there's no such thing as a fish?" when in reality obviously fish are real, it's just that fish describes the shape of a creature.

    people just love fixating on and exaggerating stuff like this, presumably because it starts arguments online

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 1 month ago
    [–] 13 points 1 month ago (6 children)

    Intelligence is knowing that tomatoes are fruits

    Wisdom is knowing that tomatoes don’t belong in a fruit salad

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 month ago* (3 children)

    Charisma is being able to sell a tomato-based fruit salad.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Constitution is being able to eat a tomato-based fruit salad

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 1 month ago (1 child)

    There are two supermarket chains in my area. One puts canned olives in the canned vegetable aisle, the other in the canned fruit aisle. And I always forget which is which and invariably end up in the wrong aisle.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Reminds me of the Smarty Pants "vegetables don't exist" presentation

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Fun fact: in Italian we have 2 different words for vegetables (the reign) and vegetables(the culinary word) which is respectively: vegetali and verdure

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 month ago

    I've always tackled this problem by seeing it differently depending on the context, "culinary" or "scientific" . Scientifically, a Jalapeño is a fruit, but culinarily it is a vegetable. Same with other foods like tomato being a fruit or cucumber being a berry. They're just vegetables in a cooking context but not in a scientific one

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago

    MAPLE SYRUP IS A VEGETABLE

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 month ago (2 children)

    Vegetables are edible plant parts. Fruits are a specific type of vegetable.

    Its a real square-rectangle thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 1 month ago

    Watermelons are berries and strawberries are not

  • source