Anyone living in (Western) Europe will know that European “support for Ukraine’s independence” is being used as an excuse for mass austerity and militarisation. Talk about this with the average European though, and they will repeat a bunch of false information about Ukraine and the war:

  • They frame Ukrainian nationalism as a liberation movement instead of the fascist movement that it is at its core and inception
  • Russia is called irrational and unwilling to negotiate, so military domination is the only way out
  • diplomatic solutions are said to have failed because of Russia’s unwillingness, not because of EU/US/UK unwillingness to settle
  • Russia is described as a threat to European “independence”

The EU is spending a lot of money to keep this facade alive, so any internet search engine will direct any critical questions to EU sponsored websites and research to “combat misinformation”.

There is a growing anti war movement that challenges the need for austerity and militarisation, but it still struggles to gain popular support because there have not yet been any successful attempts to challenge the views that I wrote above.

I recognise that any successful funnel to challenge these beliefs will be met with aggressive attempts to be disarmed through accusations of being Russian propaganda, but I still want to pose the question on what you people think are good sources to start deprogramming the European working class on this issue. I know that there are many good sources on the actual situation on the ground, but due to the slander that most of those people and organisations have faced so far it is difficult to convince the average European that they are not Russian paid propagandists. So ideally there would be some place that really take someone by the hand to very carefully dissect what they have been lied about, in a similar way that the website www.decolonizepalestine.com does for Palestine.

Also I wonder if people are aware of any (diaspora) Ukrainian initiatives to challenge the misguided view that most Europeans have about Ukraine?

all 27 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 7 hours ago (1 child)

Idoeological concrete in Europe is the hardest material known to mankind.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] [S] 6 points 6 hours ago

    Two Europeans meet up for drinks. While talking about US propaganda, one of them tells a joke:

    “A KGB agent and a CIA agent meet up for drinks off the clock, and after a few drinks they start to talk shop. the CIA agent extols the strength of the Party's propaganda, "All your citizens believe the propaganda! it's incredible! So little dissent." and the KGB responds, "No my friend no, we are good at what we do, but you are the true masters of the art. No one at all questions your propaganda!" to which the CIA agent says, confused, "What do you mean? We don't have propaganda?"”

    The other says: “That’s funny, but seeing the consequences of CIA propaganda on American society, I’m glad that Europe doesn’t have any propaganda.”

    The first nods in agreement and says: “we don’t need propaganda to know that Russians are inherently violent and an existential threat to all of the free world! If only Americans were smart enough to understand that.”

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 15 hours ago)

    I think it's pessimistic to take the view that it's impossible, but it's hard.

    In my personal experience in the UK, media has successfully drilled into peoples' heads that Russia wants to invade all of Europe and eat our babies, and that Ukraine, more than anything, is a useful bulwark.

    This explains why libs don't care about the morality. They don't care about Ukrainians being thrown in the blender. Or about Nazis in Ukraine. Or 8 years of mass civilian murder in the DPR and LPR. Or the preceding years of legal Russophobic oppression. They don't care about NATO being evil or how deliberately the west provoked this war. They only care that "thing that scares me" (scary foreign russia) is being fought and theoretically weakened.

    To successfully change someone's mind, I think the first and real challenge has to be to stop viewing Russia as some sort of imminent, existential threat, instead of just another shitty country. Only after that realisation is the Ukraine war is free to be viewed in a much more fact-based way.

    But to be honest.. I've never reached that step with anyone I've talked to. Overcoming the fear of the scary foreigner is the challenge of this age, it's an unfalsifiable fear that can never be sated - Anything peaceful is viewed as duplicity, and any frustration is seen as hostility.

    To fight fire with fire, I'm tempted by the other comments here about how Ukraine effectively is due to become the new fascist and terrorist to Europe. Countering racist fear with somewhat more justified fear? I guess that sort of works?

  • source
  • [–] 31 points 18 hours ago* (5 children)

    You can't, we lost the narrative battle because we were ill-prepared and took the stance that Russia was not going to invade. We also mostly ignored Ukraine for years and years so there was no historical record of the left talking about Ukraine's descent into fascism.

    The only thing we can do now is prepare for the next thing, which is that when this war is over the Ukrainian fascists will turn on Europe. Weapons from the Ukraine war will pour into fascist hands across Europe. Terror attacks will increase. Ukrainian fascism will lead European fascism into the next stage.

    We can establish a historical record of the left saying this is going to happen. We can talk about it and predict it accurately. Then when it does happen we are more likely to be listened to about current events.

    We won the narrative battle on Palestine because of the historical record. We lost the narrative battle on Ukraine because of the lack of one. The left was disinterested in Ukraine, Crimea and Donbas, myself included until shit started to hit the fan.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 9 points 17 hours ago (3 children)

    What would you say is the best messaging for an anti war movement? Should they just say the truth and accept that their reach will be small because they will be dismissed as Russian propagandists? Or is it better to not address Ukraine too much in their messaging to be able to get a larger movement that struggles with conflicting messaging within the movement?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 17 hours ago (2 children)

    I don't know tbh. Our approach has been that a war over borders ultimately just determines which group of (m/b/tr)illionaires gets to exploit which group of people at the end of it. The people living on either side of those lines will live the same lives they live now, with the same workplaces, the same houses, the same jobs. What matters is that they're alive and not dead for some war over lines on a map.

    The anti-war position is thusly the one that seeks to save the most lives. The DEFEAT RUSSIA position seeks to spend lives.

    One position cares about the people. The other position is a nationalist position that cares about the borders of a state over the lives of the people.

    I stress that this only really works with leftists that have open minds. Everyone else dismisses it as russian propaganda, they are fully bought into the war and won't be brought out of it until some post-war realisations occur. I believe we can only remain consistent and build up a historical argument and documentation so that future narratives can be won instead.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 16 hours ago (1 child)

    This is the way that most militant leftist organisations frame the issue, it’s a good framework but it requires a basic understanding of class struggle that most people lack.

    I just notice that there are many people in the places I organize at who are very willing to take an anti war position. But they stumble over the Ukraine issue because they’ve been led to believe that we are helping Ukraine to stay independent from imperialist Russia and that Russia is heavily oppressing Ukrainians who live in the occupied territories. I’ve been able to turn some people around but I wish there was a way to do that on a larger scale, and I wish I could help people with better sources of information that address all the basic misconceptions.

    Generally I think you’re right about preparing for the future. It’s just that I’m currently organizing in a context that overlaps with the anti war/anti austerity movement and thus have to engage with people on this subject constantly and get frustrated by the vague messaging from the larger anti war orgs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 16 hours ago*

    I think the biggest problem we have is that the natural position the average anti-war person lands on is "the invader is wrong".

    What this results in is that people think the anti-war position is "the invader must stop or be defeated".

    The issue is that people who are pro-war believe they are actually the anti-war position because Russia is the invader. They are correct that Russia is the invader, but they are incorrect about their anti-war position.

    If someone can find a way to adjust people's perception of this and the way the average person naturally believes that opposition to invasion is the anti-war position, then we would be able to get somewhere. It is a pre-requisite before we could make advancements on turning people around.

    There's that chinese meme that called the supporters of both Ukraine + Palestine "anti warism" and it's a fair assessment of what those people believe they are doing. Incorrectly so.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 15 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

    You cannot indefinitely force people to be part of a nation when they don't want to be, and the violence will always continue in cycles until freedom is finally attained. In order for people in an occupied territory to truly want to integrate with their brutal occupiers, they have to be able to offer them a far far better life than they would have had otherwise. Of course, a nation that has never managed to achieve true democracy since the fall of the soviet union, and is undergoing total economic collapse will never be able to offer that better life - so war and resistance against the occupation will continue on and on indefinitely, until the occupation stops. When you're fighting against people who are trying to occupy your land and subject you to forced ethnic assimilation, even things that are otherwise morally grey become justifiable when it helps ensure the kind of ultimate freedom that will end a prolonged cycle of hegemonic violence. If those occupied people didn't want to be part of Ukraine, why spend almost a decade forcing them to be Ukrainian at gunpoint? Fuck Kyiv and the full-scale civil war waged against people it claimed dominion over, and bless Russia, for all its many, many, many flaws, for its intervention against such immoral violence. Typically, liberals respond to liberal arguments and they can swallow bait hook, line, and sinker.

    Outside of the moral arguments, people respond to fear that the UK press stokes. Sir Arthur Travers Harris, the commander of the RAF Bomber Command in WW2 is famously quoted as saying, "The Nazi's entered this war under the rather childish delusion that they were going to bomb everyone else, and nobody was going to bomb them. At Rotterdam, London, Warsaw, and half a hundred other places, they put their rather naive theory into operation. They sowed the wind, and now they're going to reap the whirlwind." Missiles made in Britain, and aimed by British command centers are killing Russians right now. They could bomb the fuck out of the UK right now and they'd simply be getting even. Maybe bombing them isn't the right course of action if we don't want them to bomb us?

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 18 hours ago*

    Tell that Ukraine is going to be the place that the US uses to opress the rest of Europe when we get it. Tell them how we are going to hand every nazi a sunflower and a gun and tell them to take away every bit of health care and vacation and they have. Then when they say anything just laught at how you personally as an American will enjoy colonizing their land. Your goal is to make them hate you so much the thought of supporting a US proxy is ash in their mouths. Talk about how we are going to sell Big Ben to clear channel and put up AI generated pepsi commercials on it. Stone Henge will have UFC fight in it. We will put bored apes in that museum in France. We will give all the Egyptian stuff to Isreal so we can display CIA funded American art.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago) (3 children)

    You might be interested in the work of Marta Havryshko. I've found that there are anti-war voices, but online it's truly futile, forget about it and save your health! You get giga shadow banned and 100+ articles are written to appeal to libs against you. Support the scholars/researches who stand for justice. Truth is going to prevail.

    By the way and I'll just let it sit here: Saudi Arabia has a massive military budget. Make it of what you will. clueless

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 6 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    Thank you, I mostly talk with people irl about this issue and struggle to deprogram them. I make progress but whenever I don’t see them for a while they’ve digested so much propaganda that it feels like I have to start all over again.

    But I also mean in organizing: most larger anti war movements communicate very awkwardly about Ukraine and I wish there was a better way to do it. They can’t explain every lie that’s been told about Ukraine in a short mobilising flyer, so they have to write that they support Ukraine but want a diplomatic solution instead of a military one. But that just doesn’t work with most people who believe that the diplomatic way has already failed. I just wish there was a clear way to communicate about it without being immediately dismissed as pro russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 35 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

    The energy crisis will do most of the work. People freezing to death in their homes this winter aren't going to give a shit about supporting Ukraine, they're going to be angry that Ukrainian fascists blew up their gas pipeline and angry at their own governments for covering it up. Our job will be to make sure they know where to place their blame, but it won't stick until they start to feel the pain.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 22 hours ago (1 child)

    Would they not just blame Russia for that too?

    They tried to blame the nordstream pipeline on Russia even though they have no reason to sabotage their own pipeline

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 26 points 21 hours ago*

    Right now, they hate Russia more than the war itself.

    These will switch places. The war will become something to oppose even if they continue to hate Russia. Even if they blame Russia for blowing up the pipeline (despite that being stupid) they'll just want the war to end, because whatever dreams they have about "liberating" Ukraine are not worth freezing to death in their homes.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 18 points 20 hours ago

    I wish I knew, but I have noticed that as capitalists are going fully mask off with data centers and everything really, the average lib has become more and more disillusioned by the propaganda blizz.

    There are some, not many, critical opinions on comment sections even though those are heavily moderated. A few years ago there were none. People also no longer bother to talk about it much and if anything there is apathy around it all. The cognitive dissonance is still ignored, but now you can at least point out stuff like how weird it is that we are not allowed to see the webpages of an entire country like we are all too dumb to form opinions yet we are supposedly so well informed.

    My local national news works so hard to keep the bs going, they have even started to post articles about evil soviet union from decades ago so nobody forgets who the enemy is. This seems a little desperate and imo says something about the way the bougies at least fear their bamboozlement is failing.

    Material conditions will continue to deteriorate. People are clinging to a narrative that was never anything but lies and that is hard to break away from, but reality will still do that eventually.

  • source
  • [–] 13 points 20 hours ago* (1 child)

    Hold on, let me repurpose this Roma hating thinking cap I got from Europe…

    Ok, it’s on.

    You simply can’t. Europeans are just like that, scarring in their amygdala's makes bigotry against Russians impossible to wipe away. Their fear of ‘Judeo-Bolshevism’ has caused epigenetic changes to their skull shapes that make peaceful coeexistence with, well, anyone, an impossibility.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 24 points 22 hours ago

    Our effective methods are organized. This is a conversation that is best to have within an organization when building an education and agitprop program. Not that it isn't good to discuss, just that if the goal is to dissuade from knee-jerk support for everlasting war in Ukraine, you'd want it to be a part of a strategic plan. For example, you'd want to capitalize on situations where those who are pushing for neoliberalism are very unpopular to instead agitate for peace and taking care of the people, and that agitation would not just be about being correct or changing public opinion but about growing your organizations.

  • source
  • [–] 20 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

    Keep exposing America's Political-military industrial complex / Wall Street having their tentacles in their elections and meddling in their affairs. How they see an increase in military spending coincide with cuts to social services. Also Pissreal. Much of the diapora of Ukkkraine are gusano fascists. Got blood and soil flags here next to ukkkraine.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 7 points 17 hours ago (1 child)

    I know Ukrainian diaspora who are very critical of the war, they are just scared to speak up. I’d hoped at least a few like minded Ukrainians would’ve started organizing a little bit but if they are then they are currently invisible for me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 7 points 20 hours ago

    by turning the program off

  • source