top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 147 points 3 weeks ago* (9 children)

Absolute idiot.

Edit: "During a session" – man, fuck off.

  • source
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Is this today's parlance for a good old jerk off? I can't catch up with the youth

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    No, it’s probably just boring chatter - these people are slowly disconnecting from normal (or even problematic) human interaction, growing into a sort of symbiotic relationship with the machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Symbiotic means mutually beneficial. Half or more of the time it's not benefitting the human and machines cannot benefit from any experience.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    They love to syphon up all the data for 'training' so it could be argued that it's mutually beneficial... but it's comparable to that zombie virus/fungus that infects and takes over the caterpillar

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 10 points 3 weeks ago

    Session for me means a session of Claude code. Not sure why you would pollute context with such questions.

    If they have long enough chats with the chatbot interface that the word "session" comes into mind, I have no idea what they're doing with their life.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 97 points 3 weeks ago (18 children)

    Bro was already on an Internet connected device and was too lazy to just switch to Google. This is advanced stupidity.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • [–] 39 points 3 weeks ago (8 children)

    We haven't used google here for over 5 years friend. Please change to ddg, ecosia, kagi, or searxng. Your life will improve.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 weeks ago (7 children)

    Already been on DDG for a hot minute, but using "Google" as a generic term for search cheapens their brand name.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    I gotcha. I just prefer to say search or looked up myself.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    Google erasure is the way to go. I somwtimes jokingly say i "binged it"

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 7 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

    How did they take the picture if their phone was in their hand?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 weeks ago

    Just gotta move the phone back faster than c (taking a roundabout path so that your phone's path while moving doesn't obscure or mix with the desired pic) while also switching to the camera app and hope your didn't have a delay set on your camera or you just did a lot of damage to the area for nothing (even approaching c is pretty violent to everything else nearby not at c).

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • [–] 92 points 3 weeks ago (12 children)

    Why is this a photo of a phone showing the post instead of just a screenshot of the post?

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

    Likely because the application will detect that a screenshot was taken and will then notify the guy who posted it that someone screenshot their post (and who did it.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 weeks ago* (4 children)

    Looks like the photo was taken using a translation app, maybe?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    A translation app that renders the scratch on the screen over the top of its translated text?

    iUnr9IYM5xOLb5i.png

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

    I tried something similar. Asked ChatGPT to keep an eye on my wife's flight and to alert me 15 minutes before I would have to leave from where I currently was in order to pick her up. I was around 45 minutes from the airport. It told me to drive 5 minutes before she landed. I didn't trust it for shit and was on time though.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

    I like this. It illustrates very well how AI works. Very often when a movie is released then there's a screening at that time. So AI said yes!

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 3 weeks ago

    I was invited by a newly made friend to go to a party being celebrated by a food store. It sounded fun. We got there and there was nothing. "It was two days ago." "But ChatGPT said it would continue through today," quipped the moron.

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    Can't decide who is dumber, the AI or people trusting the AI

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

    No idea what the movie is... but doesn't that poster say December 6th 2026? That's the Release day, no?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 3 weeks ago (6 children)

    Can you even use AI for anything fairly recent? It's been a while but asking for anything that is supposed to happen on the same day seems useless.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 child)

    AIs can query the web and parse the results, so it is possible for Claude to understand the question, search the web for movie schedule of a cinema, parse the website and give an accurate answer. It's also very possible for it to do it incorrectly or just pretend that it did that and give you a random time instead so that you are happy.

    I can't imagine trusting an AI with something like this, where it's so easy to just check it yourself

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›