all 14 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Wow that’s crazy, I thought they just drove larger and larger trucks over the bridge until it broke. Then weighing the last truck and rebuilding, apparently isn’t the way it’s done after all.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    Is it wrong to tell things like that to your children?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 15 points 4 days ago (1 child)

    You don't really need to do finite element analysis on a truss though. It's solvable with some simple equations usually. It's been a long time for me though so maybe I'm wrong

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 days ago

    For a plank, it is. For anything else, where you are using more complex shapes and more than one material, no finite firm is known, so FEM all the way (or some other simulation technique)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 10 points 4 days ago (2 children)

    They use matrix math for that? How did I not know that?! 🤯 I thought they use regular algebra and a bit of trigonometry.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 days ago

    What's pictured here is the Finite Element Method. Basically, the bridge is composed into little chunks, on which the physics solution is approximated by e.g. linear functions. Then one has to assemble and solve a system of equations (the matrix shown here) to determine the coefficients (i.e. slope) of those linear functions. Putting everything together gives a piecewise-linear approximation of the physics solution, and the smaller you make the chunks the better your solution gets. All of this is of course not done by hand, that's what computers are for.

  • source
  • parent
  • doesn't look that hard in matrix format

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 4 days ago