all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 3 points 17 minutes ago

Many places won't rent to someone that cannot prove monthly income greater than 3x the rent.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 51 minutes ago

    Tips help the owner not the employee.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 55 minutes ago

    nO 1 wAnTs 2 wOrK nE mOaR!!!1!11!

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago) (3 children)

    So this has been the case for over twenty years now with people "discovering" this well known and well documented practice of keeping employees below full time to keep them from giving benefits every couple of years. Hell it was exactly like this when my sister was working there as a teenager.

    I mean this is kind of what is wrong with America honestly, memories of a gold fish and one of the reasons why no progress ever gets made.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 3 hours ago (2 children)

    Tying benefits to employers is idiotic. Even if you want to tie benefits to work requirements, this system fucks the millions of people with multiple part-time jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 hours ago

    Yup. I worked at Target circa 2010 and it was the same. I was scheduled 38 hours a week, and you would get written up if you were late clocking out.

  • source
  • parent
  • I remember when I was working at McDondald's and they never worked me above 32 hours typically. Back then it was 40 as the cutoff. That they're allowed to scuzz their way around the law through this means we'll never get equity with our system. They must be punished for such practices.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Why are there even brackets and thresholds for benefits? It should be a linear scale. 1 hour of work = 1/40th, 29h = 29/40, 30h = 30/40th etc.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 5 hours ago

    All of my life I been lied to
    Just found out my boss makes 500 times what I do
    And still wants to cut my hours back
    To 39 and three quarters 'cause 40 gets you a health plan
    And I got a feelin' I'm a need it
    Losin' feelin' in my knees and my lower back
    And I'm going back, trapped like a lower class clown
    Hold a rat down, so we kill each other over cheddar
    Keep us hungry so we never organize for nothing better
    Just make it through the day, make it through the week

    -- You Say Millionaire Like It's a Good Thing, Guante

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 hours ago

    Even at 32 hours I don't get any benefits at Walmart.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 5 hours ago (1 child)

    This is not a new thing. There's a documentary from 2005 called "Wal-Mart: The High Cost of Low Price" that goes into detail about similar actions they were taking back then.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    Seems the answer would be to end exemptions like this for companies with gross revenues or profits over certain figures that people smarter than me can figure out.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 77 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    I've never been the same since it clicked in me that welfare payments are used in a huge part to subsidise the businesses that refuse to pay more than minimum wage. So when the news trumpets that "$COMPANY has made record profits this year", all I hear is a story about how much profit that company has made while also receiving an indirect government bailout.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 40 points 7 hours ago

    Back in 1960, the minimum wage was $1.00/hour and the cost of the average US home was $11,000.00.

    When Richard Nixon was elected in 1968, 'middle class' was defined as one job paying for a house, a car, and enough money to send the kids to college. In those days $1 million was considered a vast fortune. After five GOP Presidential terms, middle class was two incomes to support a family of four, and $1 million was what a rich guy paid for a party.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 4 hours ago

    We have been cowed too much to take back everything that has been stolen from us 😒

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago) (2 children)

    Where I work you can only work temporarily for 2 years before they automatically get a permanent contract (it's UK law basically). I got a colleague come to me for support yesterday saying he's been told his contract won't be renewed beyond 1year+11months and they're going to advertise to hire another person into the role (presumably for another 1 yr + 11 m).

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 5 hours ago*

    They do this at our Post Office.

    The Union says you must get a raise after 12 months of continuous employment.

    Well wouldn't you know it. They only write contracts for 50 weeks employment and 0 PTO. They phrase this contract as if it's how they "gift" you 2 weeks of vacation. My coworkers didn't understand it until we got to week 49...

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 31 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    I've been boycotting WalMart for 25 years, but regrettably this has not put them out of business. Fortunately, it meant that not a single one of my dollars went into their greedy, overstuffed pockets.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 5 hours ago* (1 child)

    I’ve been boycotting WalMart for 25 years, but regrettably this has not put them out of business.

    Something for "free market" cargo-cultists to remember, when they try to pretend that boycotts are a substitute for effective government regulation.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 5 hours ago (2 children)

    But if you live in the USA your taxes go to subsidize the wages of their employees through Medicaid and SNAP. We need to do more than boycott but most of us are too tired and broke to do even that much. Good job on doing what you can

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago*

    Exactly, if the owners paid enough wages then people would make too much to qualify for the public assistance and would be happier and healthier. That's what controlling systems don't want, gotta keep the majority in scarcity mode so they keep making bad choices from stressed brain, can't use prefrontal cortex as much which critical thinking requires.

    Edit: higher wages also increases the tax base to help pay for all the things we should have, like all the other rich countries have figured out how to do.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 51 points 10 hours ago (1 child)

    This is how you radicalize a generation btw.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 4 hours ago (2 children)

    This has been going on for 20 years. Still waiting for that radicalized generation

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 3 hours ago (1 child)

    More than that. But yeah, clearly they've figured out a formula to keep people poor and apathetic. So many people don't vote because they don't want to get involved in politics. Too bad, cause politics is involved in you - and it's fucking you over.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 hours ago

    They're scrolling tiktok and whatever feeds them a constant supply of propaganda, to numb the pain of life, caused by the controlling systems they support, as a team sport, identity their fragile egos are too weak to choose to change. That takes too much courage and integrity.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 98 points 11 hours ago (1 child)

    what's screwed up is at 2010 a month it also disqualifies you from Medicaid in states that have low income eligibility. It's not uncommon that if you aren't getting benefits to self cap your hours at 20-25 hours a week because any more and you lose federal aid, so its cheaper for them to actually work /less/. All stemming from the companies inability to let their workers work.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 101 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    Yep, these effects are called welfare traps. It's why benefits shouldn't have hard thresholds, but instead taper off gradually as income increases.

    Although in the case of health care, it should obviously be universal in the same way that every other developed country implements it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 29 points 10 hours ago (2 children)

    What we as a society can do is create fertile conditions for unionizing to stop stuff like this.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 hours ago*

    Hopefully, if too many aren't too strongly indoctrinated and identified with the team against unions and better worker benefits. Workers in other countries have benefits at all jobs, and they would never go back to the lack of benefits that usa workers accept. Workers here like to feel special that they have a job with "good benefits" that others don't have so they prefer that. It's part of the "pioneer, cowboy, self-made" story, but in reality it's the same selfish and greed that runs deep and they're proud of it.

  • source
  • parent