you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 35 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago) (3 children)

So this has been the case for over twenty years now with people "discovering" this well known and well documented practice of keeping employees below full time to keep them from giving benefits every couple of years. Hell it was exactly like this when my sister was working there as a teenager.

I mean this is kind of what is wrong with America honestly, memories of a gold fish and one of the reasons why no progress ever gets made.

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 27 points 8 hours ago (2 children)

    Tying benefits to employers is idiotic. Even if you want to tie benefits to work requirements, this system fucks the millions of people with multiple part-time jobs.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 7 hours ago

    Yup. I worked at Target circa 2010 and it was the same. I was scheduled 38 hours a week, and you would get written up if you were late clocking out.

  • source
  • parent
  • I remember when I was working at McDondald's and they never worked me above 32 hours typically. Back then it was 40 as the cutoff. That they're allowed to scuzz their way around the law through this means we'll never get equity with our system. They must be punished for such practices.

  • source
  • parent