top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 6 points 18 hours ago

I guess I don't care. Like it's mostly for AAA games which I don't play and for Nvidia cards which I don't own. And even if I could use it, it's totally optional. Since it apparently sucks, I don't think many people will use it.

  • source
  • [–] 49 points 1 day ago (2 children)

    Oh, only a 50% performance hit on very pricy hardware for making automated lighting choices and complete face redesigns that don't respect the designers' and artists' vision?

    What a steal!

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 1 day ago (1 child)

    I think this is one of the reasons why Nvidia developed this. First it makes it a "unique" feature of Nvidia hardware, where you rely on. And secondly the huge impact in performance, so you are incentivized to buy new and faster Nvidia hardware. I don't see any other reason why Nvidia would develop this DLSS 5 Ai Slop technology.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 1 day ago* (1 child)

    This feels like motion smoothing on TVs. It's super unclear why manufacturers put it on since the first thing any sain person does is turn it off. This feels like something similar, I suspect most gamers are just going to turn it off rather than leave it on and buy better hardware especially at the moment.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 day ago (1 child)

    Bold of you to assume normies can buy this shit. Spending $4000 on a hunk of metal that works slightly better than that $500 hunk of metal you bought 4 years ago doesnt make a whole lot of sense

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 18 hours ago

    So don't buy new graphics card then. Same end result you don't have to deal with the AI slop.

    Hopefully the AI bubble bursts sometime soon and we can get back to normal. All that needs to happen is governments need to stop subsidising AI companies. Eventually a combination of public pressure and the complete lack of any progress from the companies will cause that to happen.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -13 points 21 hours ago* (1 child)

    So don't use the filter on games that weren't released with it. And you have to use it on games that released with it, because that was the intended artistic vision. Problem solved now can you shut the fuck up about it please real problems exist.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 18 hours ago (1 child)

    Real problems like gen AI's impact on the environment and the cost and accessibility of technology?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] -10 points 18 hours ago* (1 child)

    Yes leave my filters alone. It shows how fucking basic some people will themselves to be. It's a filter get a grip on reality you have a severe lack of knowledge if you think this is a problem.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 8 hours ago (1 child)

    You're ignoring that the real problem is that when AI is concerned, tech companies have demonstrated that they have a rapist's understanding of consent.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 6 hours ago* (1 child)

    You're ignoring the fact that DLSS is trained directly on the games themselves specifically for the purpose of... rendering games.

    Please further establish my point that you have no idea what you are talking about... And if your point is that yes bad AI practices exist, therefore no AI should exist how can you justify breathing? Bad people exist in this world, go kill yourself you will get back at them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 6 hours ago (1 child)

    Most people who breathe are good people. Most people running the big AI companies are not. That is the difference.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] -1 points 2 hours ago (1 child)

    The guy who runs Nvidia is a good person their employees are paid very well.... Majority of them are millionaires. Where you are an ignoramus fuckwit trying to dictate how others should mod their games.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 child)

    The guy who runs Nvidia is a good person an unapologetic zionist and trumpist

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 1 hour ago*

    Fair. But I retain my point (you dumb) and I want to make another one: DLSS is ethical AI. Computation costs is less frames for your game that is still using that GPU. DLSS itself is trained on a supercomputer rendering the games in 16k resolution it's piss easy data to generate (compared to stealing data)(then it is baked, it is finite goal), neural rendering/these filters have been anticipated for over a decade way before ChatGPT. The actions of OpenAI, Anthropic, Meta etc etc do not influence my existing excitement for this technology nor should they influence your opinion regarding this tech. There is plenty of shit I will sit down and listen for but this is not one of them simply because it happens to be within my wheelhouse and I too can be a dick.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 22 points 1 day ago

    DLSS is a plague.

  • source
  • [–] 15 points 1 day ago

    Another case of “don’t you have phones”

  • source
  • [–] 54 points 2 days ago (5 children)

    Cloud looks like Scarlet Johansson, I can't unsee it.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 19 points 2 days ago

    I'm tired, boss.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 days ago

    I guess they felt videogames didn't look quite enough like soap operas or instagram "models".

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 2 days ago

    Thx I hate it

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    I want to see it with Quake

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 1 day ago

    If the point of the tech was to make Jesse Faden look like an old-aged pensioner, then mission accomplished.

    I'm sorry, but if my wife looked like this in her 60s and 70s I'd be very happy.

    She's supposed to be 35 in the game. The videos in the article didn't make her look older than 40. The article is hyperbole.

    Also that Skyrim character look bad regardless of DLSS on or off is not a surprise. Fans probably call it a feature. Just shows the tech isn't magic.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›