this post was submitted on 18 Jul 2023
53 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19089 readers
3985 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 2 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I've always drawn the dividing line between people who have to work and people who choose to work. The latter can spend every waking moment of their lives ensuring that the former never, ever become one of them. And it sure looks they are succeeding. If the survival of mankind hinges on rich people willingly giving up ANY of their wealth at all, then mankind will perish. To a rich person, giving up wealth is no different than someone suggesting to you that they need to cut your nose, ears and limbs off to save humanity. You'd say no to that as well. In fact, you'd do anything to avoid this scenario. And while you're slaving away for a minimum wage that should be $25, and quibble over trans rights, the rich laugh into their fists, watching as you still don't seem to have realised that the bargaining power would be in your hands if you could just unite for a fucking second.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago

I disagree with the author's description of class simply because the disparity between the wealth controlled by the upper 1% and everyone else is comparable only on orders of magnitude. Whether you call them technocrats, petite bourgeoisie, the "new" class, or anything else, they still have to sing for their suppers. A millionaire, even a small multi-millionaire, has luxury, but his grandchildren will need jobs.

In reality, there are only two classes. If you've ever had to work, if you've ever had to borrow for education, if you've ever had to care about money because there would be a consequence for not having enough, then you're in the lower class. And with you is everyone else--everybody: the day-laborer immigrant, the blue collar professional, the mom and pop local businesswoman with single digit employees, your veterinarian, your dentist, your lawyer, the freelance software developer at the coffee shop, the university professor, and probably many or, depending on where you live, most or all of your local politicians. They're not the enemy, because they all have something fundamentally in common that the 1% don't: They work because they must.

That's the thing the author gets right; it's part of what makes me so frustrated whenever I see well-meaning folks succumbing to the crab bucket propaganda that wants to pit us against each other instead of the oligarchs who are literally selling the future.

No war but the class war. The sooner everybody realizes we're fighting it, the sooner we can gain ground.

load more comments
view more: next ›