I would have assumed the "wild" part of wildfire was a description of the fire's behaviour, not of the way it started.
18
‘These are human fires, not wildfires’: Dunwich reflects on the devastation
(www.theguardian.com)
I mean depends where. Boreal forests have evolved with fire being a part of their cycle. And we have been stopping them for decades. Then you throw in climate change and of course their going to be bigger and more fires.
NASA even has a paper on this and they say it is a question of when not if the fires happen.
Notice how big publications do their best to not bring up climate change is making it worst. Arsonists have always existed but now with drier conditions fires can rage longer
this post was submitted on 09 Aug 2026
18 points (95.0% liked)
UK Nature and Environment
912 readers
99 users here now
General Instance Rules:
- No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
- No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
- No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
- Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
- Do not spam or abuse network features.
Community Specific Rules:
- Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net). Research carried out in the UK that affects the UK as well as elsewhere is acceptable.
- Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.
Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.
Our current banner is a shot of Walberswick marshes, Suffolk by GreyShuck.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS