163
You can say "slaughter" but "murder" means something specific and this isn't it.
Eh, I hear you, but here in FuckCars, the mens rea is driving two tons of lethal metal, mistakes are on you buddy.
I mean could be intentional. The best way to murder someone in the us is to accidentally run them over.
I bought an e-scooter in June and it's changed my whole perspective. I didn't realize just how careless drivers are before nor the extent to which people simply don't see us. Not to give drivers an out, but I don't think people's peripheral vision is developed well for anything that isn't the size of a car.
My city has lots of protected bike lanes but one still has to be careful because someone rolling out of McDonald's may be more focused on their burger or drink than you crossing the bike lane. It's common for homeless people to be strolling into my lane, locked into their cell phone's screen, and there are even people who've fallen asleep in the lane. I always stop to make sure they're okay.
Also, last week, I had two separate incidents where I needed to use the main roads and people driving the other way, with me safely in my own lane mind you, decided to yell at me or honk incessantly, apparently angered that I was on the road at all. It was jarring and I wasn't expecting it after using the main roads safely for two months. (My scooter goes 30mph, so speed-wise it's not an impediment to cars.) I've always gotten in the lane I need to be in and stayed there, but I'm going to stay to the right from now on any time I have to use the main roads, even though I shouldn't have to.
Essentially, yes, fuck cars. And people.
It shouldn't be 100% on me or anyone else on two wheels to ensure safety, but at least here in the US the car culture is so pervasive that it is 100% on me to be aware and if someone hits me it'll just be presumed to be my fault.
You shouldn't ride in a bike lane on the left side of the road. You should only ever ride in a bike lane on the right side of the road. I know that people like to walk on the left for safety, but this isn't that.
One of the best reasons is simply other cyclists who would be trying to use the lane correctly. There usually isn't enough room to safely pass by eachother. So someone going the wrong way doesn't work.
My city has lots of protected bike lanes but one still has to be careful because someone rolling out of McDonald’s WILL be more focused on their burger or drink than you crossing the bike lane. Every single one, every single day. Even the ones you expect to know better, like ambulances. And my city allegedly has some of the best cycling infrastructure in the UK.
I don't see this as a failure of the driver or cyclist. It's a failure of infrastructure and policy.
This is why separate bicycle infrastructure exists in civilized countries. It's better and safer for both drivers and cyclists.
If you want to blame someone, blame government. They know this, they want to sell cars because that's what they are paid to do.
We can blame the driver and the government, both of them.
I think of you drive a big heavy thing around, you have a moral obligation to fucking pay close attention so you don't accidentally kill someone. And if you're incapable of driving that carefully, sell your car already. I think that's basic morality.
I think we also need better infrastructure and much stronger traffic laws so that drivers have legal incentive to fucking drive carefully like they already should have been doing but many are not because they don't give a fuck.
I agree, a car is a loaded gun. If you had someone walking around accidentally pointing their loaded gun at people because they were not paying attention to where it was pointing, no one would be surprised when he accidentally kills someone. A rational person would recognize the negligence. But when people consistently drive carelessly others act like it was a random accident when someone dies. No MF, their negligence killed someone.
Not only that, but since people have to take tests to get licenses to drive a car, that means that everyone who drives in public is supposed to be driving at a high level.
Imagine if the government did the right thing and took away people's licenses whenever they drove unsafely, and people had to start again from scratch and take a driving test, with escalating difficulty and focus on safety, to get another license, and that the testing facilities would be controlled so that if they passed unsafe drivers, they'd have to get different testers and so on.
And then imagine if people knew what a giant pain in the ass it is to drive unsafely. Losing your license and having to take a harder test than last time. Probably it wouldn't be too many infractions before they wouldn't even let you try to get a license.
That sort of thing is why you have licenses where people are required to pass tests.
You can absolutely blame the driver. I'm a cyclist but I drive too. I've never felt like infrastructure has put me in a position where I am forced to kill a a cyclist. There needs to me more strict testing for drivers and fewer people should be allowed to drive.
You see the fact that the cyclist had two lights confused the driver and the only logical choice was to run them over.
My sister had a friend who reacted to her confusion with aggression. And as an absolute moron, she was confused lot. I really hated her.
It sounds like the suspension of the prison term isn't a special case, and he also can't drive for 3 years. I don't think this is especially favoritism for drivers over cyclists. Sounds like a normal accident with a reasonable sentence for that country for an accidental death
Wade was handed a 10-month prison sentence, suspended for two years. He was also banned from driving for three years and ordered to undertake 200 hours of unpaid community work.
Noting that the incident did not involve alcohol, drugs, phone use, or racing, judge Nadim explained that, following Wade’s early guilty plea, the appropriate prison term was 10 months. However, new sentencing guidelines meant that any jail time under 12 months would result in a suspended sentence, “unless there were exceptional circumstances”.
Sounds like a normal accident with a reasonable sentence for that country for an accidental death
Neither is such an accident normal, just normalized by insane amount of cyclists getting killed by car drivers, nor are "reasonable" and "reasonable for that country" the same thing.
Knowing that renting a car, drinking some alcohol and then running him over is the by far best method to kill someone without the risk of actual punishment might be the factual reality in my country, but I still refuse to accept this as normal or reasonable.
I would tend to agree. I came into the thread wanting bloody revenge, but after reading the article, I didn't feel like that. It seems to have been an unfortunate accident, and the guy stayed behind and performed CPR, then plead guilty and showed remorse.
When having a driver's license is the same as having a license to kill. Good job 007.
Ride with a large butane tank. If nothing happens, great. Else, it's you and them. Together.
Noting that the incident did not involve alcohol, drugs, phone use, or racing, judge Nadim explained that, following Wade’s early guilty plea, the appropriate prison term was 10 months. However, new sentencing guidelines meant that any jail time under 12 months would result in a suspended sentence, “unless there were exceptional circumstances”.
A person died. What exactly considered a special circumstance?
Also, I bet the driver was definitely on his phone.
Two rear lights don't really make you twice as safe. Silly thing to focus on.
Statistically anything making you more visable to drivers does more for safety than a helmet. (Not advocating against helmets) I think 2 rear lights is relevant, it goes to how little attention was given to the road.
By definition murder needs to premediated. If it is not then it is manslaughter.
*premeditated, also there's a whole world outside of the US, and US law is a really fucking bad baseline for good law regardless. Because the US is a backward shithole run by children.
What law do you specifically think is a bad baseline for good law?
I think that's a US thing.
The UK requires intent to kill or greviously injure, which was also missing in this case.
Wade had not driven since the incident.
this post was submitted on 08 Aug 2026
163 points (96.6% liked)
Fuck Cars
16347 readers
617 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS