op is a repost bot btw
post
Social Security is literally the easiest problem in DC to solve. All we have to do is raise the Income Cap.
Right now, we pay SS contributions on the first $185,000 in income, and nothing after that. That means anyone making less than $185K pays SS on 100% of their income, but the wealthy only pay it on their first $185K of income, and they pay NOTHING after that.
There is no reason at all that we couldn't raise the cap to $250K, $500K, $1 million, or even remove it altogether, and make them pay it on their entire revenue. That would solve the probleM, FOREVER.
That's literally all it would take. These corrupt treasonous MAGA pedophiles like Graham, and others (Mike Lee, Rick Scott, Nancy Mace, etc) would raise contributions, cut benefits, or even end SS altogether, sending millions of people into desperate poverty and homelessness, just so obscenely wealthy people don't have to pay the annual equivalent of a pack of gum, and pretend it's what's best for America.
Lindsey Graham's current thoughts on Social Security are somewhat more quiet.
Dead men tell no tales. One grave closer to a better world.
Thinking also of when Warren Buffet said his secretary paid a higher income tax rate than he did.
At least he's dead.
I'm already not retiring as it is. There's no way I can save millions of dollars at this point. I treat my "retirement" accounts as just long term savings accounts that automatically accrue when I earn. Nothing else.
Now do AOC vs Graham on stopping the rail unions from striking.
I endorse the message but I hate the use of AI to produce political memes.
I say we start by eliminating pensions for public service. So what you held an office, go back to work. While we're at it, public officials can have the exact same healthcare options as every other citizen.
And both are trash
Edit: looks like I triggered BlueMAGA
So what, pray tell, do you believe in?
Not fake politicians that talk one thing while supporting the empire.
Very enlightened. What should AOC be focusing on besides this?
Don't bother, they aren't going to engage in good faith. They want purity and accelerationism rather than praxis and pragmatism.
I don't mind trying, but I get the frustration. People would rather sprint then walk, but if you actually want to get somewhere it's just one foot in front of the other.
Hows that incrementalism working out for you? More then 50 years of 'lesser evil' with nothing to show for it other than a greater evil
She doesn't focus on anything other than buzzwords to sound progressive. She talks one thing then backs the oligarchy
So you're going to shit on only the left wing of the party but not the centrists.
There is no left wing of the party, they are all right wing fascists upholding and defending their owners.
Sure. It's not that you just hate the leftmost members of the party but not the genocide wing.
Gotta uphold that "both sides are the same" story so nobody goes to vote for the democrats and the republicans can have a clean sweep.
If this story was about the genocide pedo side of the DNC I would be, but you'll notice it's not. You've been around here long enough to have witnessed me trashing Biden before during and after his presidency along with every other Democrat.
Ooo wow purity politics, so brave.
You disagree with AOCs statement? Or are you doing a "both sides bad?" I haven't seen a "both sides bad" in a little while. Can you do it blindfolded?
all 44 comments