52

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/57036724

Archived

[...]

The law was designed to create a "shared" national identity among China's 56 ethnic groups.

"A law that brazenly pushes non-Han ethnic groups including Tibetans, Uyghurs and Mongolians toward a single, state-defined national identity rather than protecting their distinct cultures and languages," [Amnesty International's deputy regional director Sarah] Brooks said.

[...]

The Han Chinese are China's largest and most dominant ethnic group, accounting for 17 per cent of the world's population.

But 125 million Chinese citizens belong to 55 non-Han ethnic groups, including the Zhuang, Uyghur, Hui, Manchu, Yi, Tibetans and Mongolians.

Parts of China's history were dominated by non-Han Dynasties: the Manchu Qing (1644–1912) and the Mongol Yuan (1271–1368).

[...]

The Chinese government insists the new laws are not being implemented to suppress ethnic groups or languages, but to prevent separatism.

Following the 1911 revolution in which the Manchu Qing dynasty was overthrown, Mongolia, followed shortly afterwards by Tibet, declared independence from China.

Outer Mongolia became a communist nation in the 1920s, remaining so until the fall of the Soviet Union in the 1990s.

Inner Mongolia has remained a part of China, while the independent state of Tibet was annexed by the Chinese in 1951.

[...]

Life under Communist China

Initially, Inner Mongolia was organised into an autonomous region with greater political rights.

What followed was decades of persecution.

Mr Togochog said government crackdowns started in the 1950s, when tens of thousands of Mongolian elites were accused of being national separatists, suffering politic persecution and imprisonment.

This was just a taste of what came when Chairman Mao declared his decade-long "Cultural Revolution", which saw the destruction of cultural artefacts, societal upheaval and the persecution, imprisonment or death of millions.

[...]

According to a study published by the University of Cambridge, more than 16,000 Mongols were killed and five times that many were maimed.

Mr Togochog said the Mongolian population was "completely devastated by this large-scale genocide campaign".

According to a 2020 census, Mongols have now become a minority within Inner Mongolia, representing just 18 per cent of the total population.

[...]

Amnesty international's Tibetan advocate, Kyinzom Dhongdue, said the new ethnic unity law "unambiguously promotes and reinforces China's long-running policies that have already devastated the rights of Uyghurs, Tibetans and other non-Han ethnic groups".

"The Chinese government is pursuing a long-term project of forced assimilation. Or, as described by Tibetans, a cultural genocide.

"It seeks to fundamentally reshape how Tibetans, Uyghurs and other peoples, including Southern Mongolians speak, learn, worship and, ultimately, understand who they are."

Ms Allen said Chinese President Xi Jinping was pushing China towards a sort of monoculture.

"The very heavy-handed push towards assimilation should be seen through the lens of control and Xi Jinping's paranoia."

[...]

In 2020, protests rocked the region of Inner Mongolia after the Chinese government ordered an end to Mongolian-language classes for first-year primary students, in favour of Mandarin.

[...]

Authorities also began a region-wide censorship campaign, shutting down Mongolian WeChat groups and removing Mongolian-language books from the shelves of retail outlets.

"Southern Mongolians know that this is the last chance to stand as Mongolian People … if you lose your language, you lose everything," Mr Togochog said.

"What is remaining is the language, that's the last defence of the Mongolian national identity … what we call the 'final solution' to the Mongolia question."

[...]

"This is nothing but cultural genocide … they want to make you directly Chinese," Mr Togochog said.

[...]

Ms Allen said the new laws made her "really sad" and she said for many of the ethnic groups inside China, there was no diaspora for them to look to for cultural and linguistic preservation.

"I think it's such a shame for China to be heading in this direction when many other similarly situated countries are working very, very hard to preserve and revive their minority languages."

all 31 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] almalexia@lemmygrad.ml 0 points 2 hours ago

I don't know about everyone else but I think the OP doesn't like China.

It's all he posts about...may be some bias there...

Food for thought

[-] PotatoPie@lemmy.zip -1 points 2 hours ago

These guys will try anything to slander china

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

I remember long ago learning through Chinese movies of the lofty goal “If we conquer the region and put everyone under one flag, there will be no more war or hate.” You can look at places like the US to see how that turns out. People fracture. Trying to erase cultural identity doesn’t work.

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 3 points 8 hours ago

This article is nothing but anti-communist propaganda. These unity laws do nothing but but ensure minorities are able to interact with the larger culture and society, while allowing for the continued existence and teaching of minority languages and cultures.

If these laws are cultural genocide, then English as a Second Language (ESL) classes in the United States are also cultural genocide.

[-] Ember_NE@lemmygrad.ml 6 points 7 hours ago

Yeah, the western media don't understand (or don't want to understand) the Chinese approach to nationalities, which is promoting all nationalities while also promoting what they have in common, as to create unity through the hamony of differences. The law basically talks about how China should continue to share all it's unique cultural heritages across nationality lines, promote socialist principles, and ensure that everyone knows a common language for efficient communication. For example it doesn't ban teaching national languages in schools, it just says to use mandarin for other classes to ensure everyone learns it. The local party branch can still ensure that the national minority language is taught in school. This is much more than most western countries do for their minority groups. Imagine if a school in the west with many pupils from arabic background ensured that they got arabic classes, the national media would be ringing the alarm bells about "islamization".

[-] majster@lemmy.zip 1 points 3 hours ago

For example it doesn’t ban teaching national languages in schools, it just says to use mandarin for other classes to ensure everyone learns it.

If this is true, it will surely erode ethnic identity of the minorities. With such policy pupils will not have good working knowledge of their own language. Look at examples like Gaelic, Welsh, languages in France etc. Its ok to have sufficient classes of mandarin so everyone knows it, but its not ok to relegate mother tongue to just a few classes.

[-] Ember_NE@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 2 hours ago

Sure, it is a question how to best safeguard the national languages as well, and it is possible they may make mistakes here. Often policy details are left to the regional governments, so hopefully they can find good solutions. My point is just that it is a policy question, and not a "they are commiting cultural genocide". This is a continuation of the marxist approach to the national question, which often helped build up the national cultures and languages and writing systems in the first place in the time after the revolution.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 2 points 8 hours ago

Do you know what the word “Second” means? It means they don’t fucking ban people from learning or using their original family language, eg Spanish, in the United States. Trump has tried to change that and he’s an evil fascist.

Are you an evil fascist?

[-] FlyingCircus@lemmy.world 0 points 2 hours ago

These Chinese Unity laws also don’t ban people from learning or using their original family language, and in fact enshrine protections so that people can continue to learn and pass on these languages.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

It means they don’t fucking ban people from learning or using their original family language, eg Spanish, in the United States.

Nor does China. China is mandating a primary language of instruction, and that's slightly concerning, but that's not the same as banning people from using their original family language, and to call it genocide would obviously be laughably absurd.

[-] Katana314@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Right from the article, can’t quite see how this is being misconstrued:

In 2020, protests rocked the region of Inner Mongolia after the Chinese government ordered an end to Mongolian-language classes for first-year primary students, in favour of Mandarin.

Authorities also began a region-wide censorship campaign, shutting down Mongolian WeChat groups and removing Mongolian-language books from the shelves of retail outlets.

Unless this is a general “all Journalists western think tank lies blah blah”. Even Fox News tries to avoid direct lies and misleads by selective opinionated examples, so I doubt any of that can be painted in any better light.

[-] Ember_NE@lemmygrad.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

It is true that previously young students in some regions have received instruction in their national language in the first grades of school, and then in Mandarin when they have learned it well enoguh to receive instruction in Mandarin. Now, they will get instruction in mandarin from the start. This is probably a reflection of how proficiency in Mandarin is becoming more common, even among the youngest students. They can however still have classes which teach the national language also, which has also been common previously. The law mentions that this right to the national language should be protected, although it is not very specific about how local party branches should do this, essentially leaving it up to local cadre, often from minority nationalities themselves, to work it out with the people they represent.

It is of course possible to critique this, but it is not a case of the party banning anyone from speaking or learning their national language as such.

[-] Objection@lemmy.ml -5 points 6 hours ago

In 2020, protests rocked the region of Inner Mongolia after the Chinese government ordered an end to Mongolian-language classes for first-year primary students, in favour of Mandarin.

As I said, they are mandating Mandarin as the language of instruction. It's not illegal to speak Mongolian like you're trying to construe this as.

Authorities also began a region-wide censorship campaign, shutting down Mongolian WeChat groups and removing Mongolian-language books from the shelves of retail outlets.

They also shut down Chinese WeChat groups and remove Chinese-language books, depending on the content. Are they being removed because they're Mongolian-language? That isn't actually said.

Even Fox News tries to avoid direct lies and misleads by selective opinionated examples, so I doubt any of that can be painted in any better light.

Exactly, only in this case they're doing it subtly enough that you didn't catch it.

[-] Krinkil2705@lemmygrad.ml 12 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Can we see the laws that protect the ethnic identities of the minorities of the USA and the EU?

[-] ruuster13@lemmy.zip -2 points 10 hours ago

If you cared about that also-important issue you'd just make a post discussing it.

[-] Krinkil2705@lemmygrad.ml 4 points 10 hours ago

Uh-huh, and would you partake in that discussion without a single whataboutism? Even this answer proves you're arguing in bad faith.

[-] hakase@lemmy.zip -1 points 5 hours ago

and would you partake in that discussion without a single whataboutism

Holy lack of self-awareness, Batman!

[-] the_wizard_of_0Z@lemmy.ca -5 points 9 hours ago

BULL SHIT ONE HUNDOPERCENTE

this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2026
52 points (81.0% liked)

Global News

6789 readers
299 users here now

What is global news?

Something that happened or was uncovered recently anywhere in the world. It doesn't have to have global implications. Just has to be informative in some way.


Post guidelines

Title formatPost title should mirror the news source title. If you don't like the title of article, look for an alternative source instead of editorializing it.
URL formatPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
[Opinion] prefixOpinion (op-ed) articles must use [Opinion] prefix before the title. Opinion articles refer to articles that their publisher doesn't explictly endorse.
Country prefixCountry prefix can be added to the title with a separator (|, :, etc.) if the news is from a local publisher who doesn't clearly mention the country.


Rules

This community is moderated in accordance with the principles outlined in Article 19 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which emphasizes the right to freedom of opinion and expression. In addition to this foundational principle, we have some additional rules to ensure a respectful and constructive environment for all users.

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. No social media postsAvoid all social media posts. Try searching for a source that has a written article or transcription on the subject.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation. Any kind of discrimination will not be tolerated.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

Icon generated via LLM model | Banner attribution


If someone is interested in moderating this community, message @brikox@lemmy.zip.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS