409
top 48 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 1 points 9 hours ago

Everyone else: follows laws

Elon musk: hmm, that puts them at a disadvantage. Maybe next year.

[-] melsaskca@lemmy.ca 42 points 1 day ago

"Officer. I will not blow into that breathalyzer for another year!". Enforcement of the law works differently, depending on which end of the socio-economic scale you live on.

[-] Wulff@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Then it means it's not a law, just a tax on the poor.

[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Point taken but in fairness DUI is one of those that a lot of celebrities do actually get popped for

[-] Saledovil@sh.itjust.works 8 points 1 day ago

The obvious course of action in a sensible society would be to fine them 0.01$ on day one, 0.02$ on day 2, 0.04$ on day 3, then 0.08$ and so on. Until the turbines have been removed.

[-] Malyca@lemmy.zip 2 points 23 hours ago

Or remove them yourself

[-] anon_8675309@lemmy.world 8 points 1 day ago

Now that Trump is involved it may never happen.

[-] RememberTheApollo_@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago

And this is why they get rid of oversight. A Simple inspection of the plans or work to be done would have showed these turbines before they were ever built.

I doubt they’ll be removed.

[-] DarrinBrunner@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago

Because the filthy rich can do literally anything they want, and there's no one waiting to stop them.

If learning that recently surprised you, you're not alone.

The only reason Madoff went to prison is because he stole from rich people.

[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

The best justice money can buy.

[-] baltakatei@sopuli.xyz 126 points 2 days ago

Shut off their water lines, cut off their power, cancel trash collection, and close their roads. Failure to abide by the laws regulating infrastructure means they don't deserve infrastructure.

[-] njordomir@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Arrest their entire c-team.

[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 44 points 2 days ago

Eeehhh, how about you just arrest the owner? Mich more effective and a lot less work involved

Plus, when I break the law, I go to jail. Same here

[-] kunaltyagi@programming.dev 4 points 1 day ago

¿Por que no los dos?

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago
[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 22 points 2 days ago

It's owned by a corporation. Corporations have the rights of a person. But unlike actual people, you can't arrest a corporation.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

No, but we can execute a corporation like we would a human.

But that would require a government that wasn't constantly on its knees in front of the oligarchs with their mouth open.

[-] tormeh@discuss.tchncs.de 20 points 2 days ago

You can, however, confiscate all their stuff.

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 2 points 1 day ago

Not with that attitude. Corporations are made up of actual people that make these decisions. Arrest them.

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

There were efforts to move down the anti-trust path when Biden was President. But too many Americans voted for a billionaire convicted of fraud, and all investigations into any billionaire disappeared and those that were already convicted of crimes were pardoned.

You can think it's my attitude that caused this but really it's ignorance that made things this way.

[-] CareHare@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 days ago

So arrest everyone on the board or the CEO and CFO. Problem solved?

[-] fruitycoder@sh.itjust.works 3 points 1 day ago

Prison time distributed by ownership at the time of crime.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 5 points 2 days ago

Pretty sure turning off supply is easier than getting an arrest warrant against a person whom the corporate system intentionally makes it hard for them to be held criminally accountable.

[-] fira@lemmy.today 1 points 1 day ago

This. setup road blocks on trash day & see how long they last in sticking piles of garbage

[-] jpreston2005@lemmy.world 39 points 2 days ago

The company claims that it is allowed to operate the existing turbines without permits

xAI has been operating gas turbines that have the potential to emit more than 2,000 tons of smog-forming NOx per year.

the Department of Justice sided with SpaceX in the NAACP’s lawsuit, saying the unpermitted turbines were a matter of “national, economic, and energy security.”

just another case of "I'm rich, therefore, the law doesn't apply to me." And the 1000% corrupt DOJ turning around and being like "yeah, actually, that's true."

[-] spaghettiwestern@sh.itjust.works 35 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)
  • Deny
  • Delay <----------- We are here.
  • Deceive
  • Distract
[-] bitjunkie@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago
[-] Greyghoster@aussie.zone 106 points 2 days ago
[-] tjoa@feddit.org 78 points 2 days ago

Last month, the Department of Justice sided with SpaceX in the NAACP’s lawsuit, saying the unpermitted turbines were a matter of “national, economic, and energy security.”

This says it all

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 4 points 1 day ago

Bold move to put your “national, economic, and energy security” in the hands of a drug-addled former illegal immigrant.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

It's easy to see why they allow it

[-] Almacca@aussie.zone 1 points 1 day ago

I also forgot to add criminal-at-large to that descriptor.

[-] kalleboo@lemmy.world 40 points 2 days ago

Of course, the only people who have to make sacrifices for national, economic, and energy security are poor people

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 15 points 2 days ago

Breaking the law is a matter of national security. So is raping children and covering it up. So much security!

[-] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 4 points 2 days ago

No longer a "system of laws not people" anymore. If it ever was.

[-] muusemuuse@sh.itjust.works 3 points 2 days ago

So shut it down with methods outside the law. A brick is a brick.

[-] devaly@ani.social 35 points 2 days ago

2 months ban from the Epstein Island

[-] CosmoNova@lemmy.world 46 points 2 days ago

With SpaceX we actually have a company that has a real incentive to wreck the planet and that should have everyone concerned.

[-] BillyClark@piefed.social 14 points 2 days ago

I get what you're saying, but it's still harder to live in space or on Mars than to try to fix Earth. What I'm saying is that SpaceX would have to be run by a complete idiot for them to think they have an incentive to ruin the planet...... Wait.... It is run by a complete idiot.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 6 points 2 days ago

it's still harder to live in space or on Mars than to try to fix Earth

Hush, unbeliever. We just gotta invest more in the technologies that let us escape from the consequences of our greed. Well, some of us. The most greedy, actually. The rest still get to bear the consequences, but they don't matter.

Point is: pour more money into training machines to imitate all the things we don't actually understand the complexity of, and surely we'll no longer need those people when we finally escape to a better future where our serfs don't need such petty things as rights and payment. And if you help us get that, you just might get a ride on our escape too!

(You won't, but I'm hoping you're gullible enough to fall for it.)

It is run by a complete idiot.

And enabled by other idiots. Musk doesn't exist in a vacuum.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Point is: pour more money into training machines to imitate all the things we don't actually understand the complexity of, and surely we'll no longer need those people when we finally escape to a better future where our serfs don't need such petty things as rights and payment. And if you help us get that, you just might get a ride on our escape too!

All I'm hearing is "let's build the ~~Ocean~~SpaceGate station and fill it with all the billionaires" and I'm struggling to see a downside.

[-] luciferofastora@feddit.org 2 points 1 day ago

If we can pull it off before they manage to manipulate us into fucking up our world, sure. If we let their slopgenerators produce the drafts for the station, I'm sure they'll love the breathtaking result.

[-] muzzle@lemmy.zip 41 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

And when you're ~~a star~~ rich, they let you do it. You can do anything.

[-] GreenKnight23@lemmy.world 29 points 2 days ago

evidently you can grab children by the pussy and still become president.

[-] Passerby6497@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Hell, if you're friends with him, you can apparently huck a baby in a lake

[-] reksas@sopuli.xyz 14 points 2 days ago

why remove them at all? its not like they are getting any real consequences for anything they do

[-] SomeRandomNoob@discuss.tchncs.de 17 points 2 days ago

Time to remove SpaceX from the Planet

[-] luthis@lemmy.nz 14 points 2 days ago

Man just wait til the HOA finds out about this

this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2026
409 points (99.5% liked)

Technology

86849 readers
3790 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related news or articles.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS