602
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Alpha71@lemmy.world 3 points 12 hours ago

I know where I want to live. (and do)

[-] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 2 points 10 hours ago
[-] P1k1e@lemmy.world 1 points 5 hours ago

Cali ain't so bad, mostly just silicon valley making things suck

[-] Sir_Premiumhengst@lemmy.world 10 points 18 hours ago

Yes, but also Mercator projection.

[-] Tiresia@slrpnk.net 1 points 2 hours ago

Look how curved the US-Canadian borders are, and how Ellesmere island is compressed. This clearly isn't Mercator.

[-] Sam_Bass@lemmy.world 6 points 18 hours ago

tokyo firmly believes in stacking

[-] yoru77@lemmy.dbzer0.com 8 points 20 hours ago

The more you think about it, the more insane it is, like... wow

[-] LovableSidekick@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Tokyo demands the sharpest elbows of the three.

[-] Suck_on_my_Presence@lemmy.world 103 points 1 day ago

Canada population: 41.4 million

California population: 39.4 million

Greater Tokyo Area: 37.4 million

[-] Pyr_Pressure@lemmy.ca 56 points 1 day ago

Almost similar GDP as well

Canada GDP (2026): $2.51 Trillion USD

California GDP (2025): $4.25 Trillion USD

Greater Tokyo Area (2022): $1.82 Trillion USD

Wide Spread but still all in the low Trillions

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

California is inflated by Silicon Valley stuff. Maybe left-over Hollywood prestige, as well.

Japan isn't known for it's awesome economy, but it's surprising world city Tokyo is still doing worse than all of Canada including the backwaters.

[-] farmgineer@nord.pub 1 points 1 hour ago

I wonder how they're determining what's in Tokyo for the GDP calculation. For example, companies' HQs there vs actual factories or whatever they own being elsewhere.

[-] TheFrirish@tarte.nuage-libre.fr 3 points 13 hours ago

It's not surprising because GDP does not reflect quality of life in any form whatsoever. GDP is not a measure of wealth it's a measure of feverish, extractive, mindless and destructive activity.

[-] FundMECFS@piefed.zip 5 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Doing Worse is subjective.

Higher GDP ≠ Doing Better.

The US has some of the highest GDP per capita on earth but that doesn’t mean it (or its economy, if you don’t define economy just as stock market go brrr) is doing well.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] PlantDadManGuy@lemmy.world 18 points 1 day ago

California also offers an agricultural powerhouse of productivity, oceanfront tourism, and ongoing techbro circle jerks.

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago)

Oh right, a lot of produce that makes it up here is from California, although we've noticeably weaned off of it over the course of the trade war.

I did mention the techbros. If the AI bubble pops and geopolitics breaks the walled garden monopolies it might end up a lot closer to Canada.

[-] SkunkWorkz@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago

I wonder if you take out fossil fuel and logging out of Canada’s GDP if it still would be higher than Tokyo’s. Not much logging and oil drilling going on in Tokyo I reckon.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[-] blackberry28@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

Makes you wonder why housing prices in Canada are so ridiculously high then when they have so much free land space.

[-] Swedneck@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 20 hours ago

do you want to drive 3 hours to work every day?

[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 17 hours ago)

You can do better than that. I'm not sure how far you have to get from Calgary or Edmonton before abandoned, falling apart farmhouses start, but it might be only 45 minutes.

And if you're in a random part of the north, it's more like weeks of offroading.

Edit: Obviously, that 45 minutes is still enough to discourage most buyers. You might still be 20 from the nearest stores of any kind. So, the point stands, most of the land isn't acceptable for most people.

[-] PhoenixDog@lemmy.world 4 points 18 hours ago

Considering we have like 9% of the world's entire forests, where would you like us yo build these houses?

[-] KoalaUnknown@lemmy.world 13 points 23 hours ago
load more comments (4 replies)
[-] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Construction is the bottleneck.

On why construction is the bottleneck, you'll hear several theories, but just physically having land isn't the problem.

load more comments (3 replies)
[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 8 points 1 day ago

You made Saddam too small.

[-] Sxan@piefed.zip 43 points 1 day ago

80% of þe population of Canada lives South of Minneapolis, MN., USA.

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 50 points 1 day ago
[-] braindamagebuddy@lemmy.world 1 points 13 hours ago

This picture looks like Canada stabbed the USA in the neck and forgot to clean up after, jeez.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (12 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
602 points (99.2% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

6264 readers
509 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS