▲ 622 ▼ These three places all have about the same population size (thelemmy.club) submitted 2 months ago by homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world to c/map_enthusiasts@sopuli.xyz 116 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] binarytobis@lemmy.world 4 points 2 months ago (6 children) Tokyo has more people than LA? That’s surprising. permalink fedilink source hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 months ago* (3 children) The Greater Tokyo area has a population of 38.1mil, California has a population of 39.3mil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago* (2 children) Why do we count the wider metro area? Is that not like counting the wider bay area for san francisco's population? Looks like about 14 million in tokyo city proper. That's like NYC (uh never mind I guess its 8.5 million) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 months ago* How to define a city is a huge thing, and there's actually a laundry list of different techniques geographers can use. It's a concentration of people, but settlement patterns vary, and the way they're politically organised or locally referred to varies even more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago What does it matter where we draw arbitrary lines? If we take Tampa Bay by its city limits, it's a little town of no importance. Does that make sense though? permalink fedilink source parent [–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 child) You have clearly never seen Tokyo. It is excessively populated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago tokyo is not excessively populated. heavily populated, yes, but it handles its size very very well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] nocturne@slrpnk.net 19 points 2 months ago* (3 children) The Greater Tokyo area has a population of 38.1mil, California has a population of 39.3mil. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 3 child comments replies: [–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago* (2 children) Why do we count the wider metro area? Is that not like counting the wider bay area for san francisco's population? Looks like about 14 million in tokyo city proper. That's like NYC (uh never mind I guess its 8.5 million) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 months ago* How to define a city is a huge thing, and there's actually a laundry list of different techniques geographers can use. It's a concentration of people, but settlement patterns vary, and the way they're politically organised or locally referred to varies even more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago What does it matter where we draw arbitrary lines? If we take Tampa Bay by its city limits, it's a little town of no importance. Does that make sense though? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] save_the_humans@leminal.space 0 points 2 months ago* (2 children) Why do we count the wider metro area? Is that not like counting the wider bay area for san francisco's population? Looks like about 14 million in tokyo city proper. That's like NYC (uh never mind I guess its 8.5 million) permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 months ago* How to define a city is a huge thing, and there's actually a laundry list of different techniques geographers can use. It's a concentration of people, but settlement patterns vary, and the way they're politically organised or locally referred to varies even more. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago What does it matter where we draw arbitrary lines? If we take Tampa Bay by its city limits, it's a little town of no importance. Does that make sense though? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 point 2 months ago* How to define a city is a huge thing, and there's actually a laundry list of different techniques geographers can use. It's a concentration of people, but settlement patterns vary, and the way they're politically organised or locally referred to varies even more. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Danquebec@sh.itjust.works 1 point 2 months ago What does it matter where we draw arbitrary lines? If we take Tampa Bay by its city limits, it's a little town of no importance. Does that make sense though? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Drusas@fedia.io 9 points 2 months ago (1 child) You have clearly never seen Tokyo. It is excessively populated. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 1 child comment replies: [–] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago tokyo is not excessively populated. heavily populated, yes, but it handles its size very very well permalink fedilink source parent
[–] noxypaws@pawb.social 2 points 2 months ago tokyo is not excessively populated. heavily populated, yes, but it handles its size very very well permalink fedilink source parent