331

DSA candidate Oliver Larkin described President Donald Trump as a "pedophile president" during questioning by Fox anchor Trace Gallagher.

all 24 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 123 points 1 day ago

The beauty of what Larkin said is, it's a perfect trap: either Trump doesn't respond and that's kind of an admission of guilt, or he files for defamation and that automatically triggers a discovery process he really, really doesn't want.

Boy, I'll get the popcorn! 🙂 🍿

[-] Soulphite@reddthat.com 58 points 1 day ago

That's why I address him as "the pedophile" all the time... come at me bro! Hahaha

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 51 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Well, everybody and their dog calls Trump a pedophile, because if he's not a pedophile, I'm the King of England. But no public figures dares do that on TV - probably for fear of being sued. To my knowledge, this guy is the first. And he probably secured a whole lot of extra votes for it.

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 10 points 1 day ago

They could actually lose their broadcast rights via the cuorrupt FCC, but tbh that doesn't really matter to anybody but Fox News because most networks broadcast on satellite or online nowadays instead of archaic airwaves and cable.

[-] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 7 points 1 day ago

doesn't the FCC only control the airwave spextrum, not cable at all?

[-] FiniteBanjo@feddit.online 6 points 1 day ago

The Federal Communications Commission first established rules in 1965 for cable systems which received signals by microwave antennas. In 1966, the Commission established rules for all cable systems (whether or not served by microwave). The Supreme Court affirmed the Commission's jurisdiction over cable in United States v. Southwestern Cable Co., 392 U.S. 157 (1968). The Court ruled that "the Commission has reasonably concluded that regulatory authority over CATV is imperative if it is to perform with appropriate effectiveness certain of its responsibilities."

according to the FCC

[-] homesweethomeMrL@lemmy.world 58 points 1 day ago

Gallagher repeatedly attempted to engage Larkin on the topic of an acceptable number of “children who can be raped and it’s fine in relation to the immigration community.”

“If we’re going to talk about children being raped, then we need to hold this pedophile president Donald Trump accountable and all those that can implicate in the Epstein files that the Department of Justice is still not leaking and they’ve sent AIPAC after Thomas Massie—” Larkin began before Gallagher interjected, “Got it, thanks.”

“—for having the temerity to hold accountable the pedophiles that are in control of our government,” Larkin concluded.

“Thank you. We appreciate your time very much,” Gallagher said before the segment’s end.

[-] cranakis@reddthat.com 12 points 1 day ago

The interview was worth suffering through for that ending. He mentioned Trump being a child rapist and my man wanted to cut to commercial. Fucking hypocrites.

[-] nkat2112@sh.itjust.works 17 points 1 day ago

Lordy, this was good. Thank you for sharing that.

Surprised this made the air

[-] ExtremeDullard@piefed.social 27 points 1 day ago

Either it was live, or Faux News figured it would work up the MAGA dumdums, and as such had broadcast value.

[-] Bahnd@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You would think after that superbowl incident, TV stations would learn to have appropriate buffers for things that happen spontaniously.

I guess people smart enough to think of that dont work for Fox.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 2 points 1 day ago

You mean with Janet Jackson?

[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 day ago

He had so many easy layups that he fumbled. Instead of calling out disingenuous questions, he let himself be trapped.

Q: "You won't applaud ice for getting ride of violent criminals?"

A: Yes, for every criminal convicted. How many people were deported who had no criminal record, and have not been charged with a crime?

[-] gAlienLifeform@lemmy.world 16 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

I don't think wasting time arguing over a question's wording instead of just diving into the actual substance of the issue like Larkin did would have looked good, and looking at the rest of that exchange it seems like the Fox people sure didn't like how it went for them,

Gallagher asked Larkin if he supports open borders.

“I don’t think there’s anything to fear with people seeking a better life in the United States of America,” Larkin answered before he noted his wife is the “proud daughter of a Nicaraguan immigrant.”

Larkin cited legislation by Jared Moskowitz, his opponent in the Congressional race, who was part of the effort that passed the Laken Riley Act, which requires the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) to detain immigrants who have been accused of a crime. Riley was a 22-year-old student who was attacked and killed by José Antonio Ibarra, an undocumented immigrant.

The pair sparred verbally on the topic of immigration. “We need to keep our communities safe and we need to hold people accountable when they have harmed others, when they have broken the law but let’s be clear. Immigration is a civil violation, not a criminal violation,” Larkin said.

“So we need to stop treating the equivalent of a parking ticket like people are breaking the law and need a militarized police force breaking down their door,” he continued. “So the comparison here is not one of criminality. It is whether we are respecting international law, the right to asylum, the right of respecting refugees’ rights.”

Gallagher repeatedly attempted to engage Larkin on the topic of an acceptable number of “children who can be raped and it’s fine in relation to the immigration community.”

“If we’re going to talk about children being raped, then we need to hold this pedophile president Donald Trump accountable and all those that can implicate in the Epstein files that the Department of Justice is still not leaking and they’ve sent AIPAC after Thomas Massie—” Larkin began before Gallagher interjected, “Got it, thanks.”

“—for having the temerity to hold accountable the pedophiles that are in control of our government,” Larkin concluded.

“Thank you. We appreciate your time very much,” Gallagher said before the segment’s end.

[-] Not_mikey@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Nah, the answer to these questions is "that's not ice's job, and they're not doing that"

Investigating and arresting violent criminals is the job of the local police , FBI etc. Ice is Immigration and customs enforcement , they enforce immigration laws, not violent crime laws.

The guy was sort of getting at that by calling illegally crossing a misdemeanor but didn't drive home that that's all they're arresting people for and that all those examples the guy was giving of the horrible crimes of migrants were probably investigated and arrested by local police, not ICE.

[-] monkeyslikebananas2@lemmy.world 11 points 1 day ago

You give the average Fox News viewer far too much credit. They don’t understand unless it’s zingers.

[-] ragepaw@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 day ago

Fair enough

[-] pelespirit@sh.itjust.works 6 points 1 day ago

The Democratic Socialist Party=The Golden Rule Party

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 0 points 1 day ago
[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 day ago

The news isn't so much that Trump is a pedophile, but that even FOX News is saying that Trump is a pedophile now.

[-] quick_snail@feddit.nl 1 points 1 day ago

Ah, OK. Thanks

[-] quarkquasar@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

Because we live in an absolutely horrible country, and someone actually said the truth of Fox news for once?

this post was submitted on 31 Jul 2026
331 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30619 readers
1921 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS