cross-posted from: https://lemmy.blahaj.zone/post/46041339

Imagine if behind-the-scenes they were and the rise of AI was actually fuelling itself? A most disturbing prospect

all 46 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 81 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Possibility? I thought we knew this was happening for real?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 36 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Here's a video clip of an interview with Masayoshi Son, the CEO of SoftBank (who is heavily invested in AI) saying he talks to ChatGPT for 2-3 hours every day

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It's not just plausible; it's 100% happening. I've seen it with our CEO, with my own eyes. I've seen it reported by other C-Staff in other companies. I've seen CEO's directly requote chatbot results.

    It's not a stretch. They've had yes men for decades. AI is the ultimate Yes Man, focus on getting you what you ask for, minimize negativity, ignore the skeletons you're creating.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I've seen the CTO of my company straight up use Claude to respond to slack messages.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Yeah, it's crazy how all of a sudden people who never used an EM dash or even a fucking semi-colon before now have them everywhere.

    But it takes a CEO to leave the emoji bullet points in and pass it off as their own.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago

    Of course they are, LLMs have been optimized for performing the fellatio of c-suites for a reason. Sycophancy might not appeal to you, but who do we all know loves a brown noser?

  • source
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Snake oil salesmen drinking their own snake oil.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Dirty coporats. I guess ‘ol Johnny Silverhand is gonna have to blow up Arasaka tower again.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 16 points 2 months ago

    Possibility? I think it'd be easier to point out which CEOs weren't making AI decisions based on discussions with chatbots.

  • source
  • [–] 12 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The CEO of the company I work for hasn't had an original thought since 2024.

    Which is fine — his original thoughts were all garbage anyway.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    what's the difference?

    people need to stop holding individuals on a pedestal because of wealth/status.

    if i came up with the idea for the first internet payment processor, it doesn't mean i know jack fucking shit about anything else in life--it just means i had a good idea; it means i was in the right place at the right time; i was there with the right amount of cash to take advantage of the situation.

    i don't care about your opinions on the environment or history or the future of mankind any more than i do the ones coming from the fingers of every know-nothing on social media.

    the biggest question is: who the fuck made these people god, or at least the architects of the future, of humanity? did we have a vote on it?

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [+] 10 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Altman has literally said his plan to become profitable is to build a chatbot good enough and then ask it. And that he can't imagine being a parent without relying on chatgpt for everything

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 5 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    And he got to be in that position of power… how? Makes you wonder what goes on behind the scenes 🧐🤔

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    Eh... it is the job of the CEO to promote the company and products they sell. And that's what he's doing there.

    What concerns me more is how many people believe the obvious bullshit the tech bros say.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago* (1 child)

    my former boss was doing exactly that and I wish I was joking

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    I saw a Claude log on a screen share yesterday where the dude was seriously using Claude to add two numbers together. This and things much stupider than this have been happening the whole time.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] -2 points 2 months ago (6 children)

    Hmmm... I use google to do math all the time. It's kinda nice, you can put units in and put the results in in the correct units.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Dude there wasn't any units. This was seriously something you could type into a python repl, an excel cell, or even windows calculator.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Can you type in "80 mph * 420 minutes in km" into excel and get an answer?

    Using google is useful because it will understand the units, which can serve as a check. If the units match what you're expecting you know you got the formula right.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Again there was no units in what this dude had in his Claude chat. It was a simple addition of two numbers.

    I know that people on the Internet love to argue, but Jesus tapdancing Christ man could you at least read before responding?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    It's happening. Also politicians do it. Current laws are created by AI for AI. We humans are deprecated.

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I thought this was a foregone conclusion.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    You wake up in your AI bed, eat your AI breakfast, drive your AI car, work at your AI job, go on your AI lunch break, and then get fired and replaced by a 11 year old Chinese child.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago
    [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Plausible. Their only C-suite objective is a fiduciary responsibility to shareholders and their wallets.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    They absolutely are. The AIs are quite literally building themselves

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago*

    How could you tell? Using AI to think for them and thinking for themselves both leads to the same outcomes.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Survival Bias enters the chat!

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    You can try asking AIs about their usefulness, cost effectiveness, and sustainability. Their answers vary much more than the CEOs'.

  • source