all 33 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 31 points 2 months ago

Let's replace the headline.

"Rich Albertans can get whatever medical tests they want, at the expense of basic healthcare for others."

  • source
  • [–] 30 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    "Alberta abandons Canada Healthcare principles, Federal government does nothing to stop them."

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    Healthcare is provincial.

    "American wanna be MAGA hicks once again get fucked by their voting decisions"

    Incredible how everything immediately gets blamed on Ottawa when Albertans score an own goal.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    Implementation of healthcare is provincial. It is still required to obey the Canada Health Act. Smith and her fascist government are wildly ignoring it, and the federal Liberals are...doing nothing. Signing MOUs on pipelines.

    Make no mistake - the at-fault party here is 100% the UCP under Smith (and Kenney before that - never forget that Kenney was instrumental in fucking over Alberta); but the feds have a clear legal responsibility that they're ignoring. My Liberal MP is spending all of his energy decrying Alberta separatism, without actually acknowledging what his government should be doing about it. (In fact, he's as completely inaccessible as the Conservative MP before him ever was. In other words, they both fucking suck.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 27 points 2 months ago (14 children)

    The death knell for public health care in Canada. Having grown up in Alberta, the public system saved lives in my immediate family. Maybe even mine.

  • source
  • hideshow 14 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 months ago (8 children)

    Watch albertans maintain their diehard majority support for the UCP.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    That "diehard majority" was a few thousand votes in the most recent election. The one before that, they actually weren't the majority - Alberta had an NDP government.

    Insisting that Alberta is eternally UCP will only help make it a self-fulfilling prophecy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    they are busy gerrymandering the new district borders so that they won't need the majority vote to stay in government.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Gerrymandering can push the needle but it can't hold back the tide. It can actually backfire if the projections that the gerrymanderers were working with turn out to be inaccurate, since it's specifically "betting" on a particular arrangement of votes.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    It's also not happening yet. The party voted for it and is now trying to gerrymander for sure, but the courts do not favour the UCP on this matter saying if challenged it'd be likely the UCP loses marking it unconstitutional. Especially with the separatist PsyOP going on I don't get the impression the currently employed judges like UCP very much given their comments lately.

    https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/calgary/electoral-boundary-commission-dallas-miller-9.7143937

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (1 child)

    How many non PC/UCP governments has Alberta elected since 1965?

    One.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    And very little to no protesting. Nobody fucking cares.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    This is why Alberta is a drive by province.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I know I'd GTFO if I ever lost the career I have here. Sure as shit won't retire here.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 18 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    It's not right for politicians to undermine publicly-funded, evidence-based healthcare.

    We don't test for no reason. No test is perfect. And so doctors will order a test when the imperfect test can meaningfully inform subsequent decision-making, based on other pieces in the clinical picture.

    I'm not sure how the system will manage medically unnecessary tests on many levels.

    Let's say some rich asshole, considering themselves an expert and wanting to take advantage of this anti-democratic system, pays for an MRI of their head with no doctor's referral simply because they have a headache.

    What priority is their scan given? Can they bump a medically necessary scan? Is it clearly communicated to the radiologist interpreting the scan that only a patient and not a healthcare provider deemed it necessary? Is the cranial MRI marked as medically unnecessary on any subsequent health records? (From a healthcare perspective, when one sees a cranial MRI done, they're thinking something much more clinically relevant than a headache happened; and this stands to cause a lot of confusion and wasted time)

    Also, diverting the system towards privatization is a huge abandonment of trying to improve our public system. Shame on the UCP!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    maybe it connects to the newly-legalized online gambling? the province said they'd pay if the speculative test turned up a specific illness… (🎰 good news! it's cancer! here's your refund! πŸŽ‰)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    This existed well before Friday. My doctor recommended I pay to get a quicker scan last year. I'm not sure of the exact details since I didn't do it.

    I won't say I'm not tight with cash, which factored into the decision, but I also really hate this fall into private health care and don't want to support that. I was told it would be about $400 for a private MRI.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 2 months ago

    Yes, before you could pay to have a private imaging center do an MRI. But, you were required to have a referral from a doctor. The difference is that as of Friday the private clinics are no longer required to only give MRIs to people that have a referral from a doctor.

  • source
  • parent
  • $750 with insurance where I live.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago (5 children)

    Im always torn by the privatization, because yah its going to create a 2 tiered system. But also, now I can actually look at something that needs to be looked at when the list is 3 years long any other way? Sign me the fuck up, here's 2 grand. Show me the fucking problem now and we can fix it hopefully.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago

    Long term, it’s not going to create a two tier system. It’s going to drain limited resources from the public system until it fails, and then all we have left is profit driven healthcare that provides worse care than what we were getting for everyone except the richest.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    spitballing, but perhaps a legislated cap at msp+10%. gives a profit over socialized health care but isn't unreachable for the everyman.

    haven't thought this through at all, so any ramifications are outside scope of this drunken suggestion. i'd appreciate critiques

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    Government like the ones in Alberta are actively and very intentionally working to privatize health care so they would never go for this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago*

    well of course, i'd much prefer globalized universal health care. unfortunately i don't see that as an option, so give me governmental price +10% as a legislated limit on privatized.

    in a perfect world we'd see socialized glp-1's and socialized safe use sites. hell if i could buy clean coke from a federal store i would.

    unfortunately that's not the world we live in so i'm limited to imagining November 5th happening to every western government and aspiring freedmen until then.

    EDIT: forgive any rambling, am on vacay and hammered

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Fucking disgusting, if this country had any morality left this would be immediately repealed and everyone involved given prison time.

  • source