Searching these devices produced no evidence relevant to the case. Nothing linked Klayme to the girl. No intimate images were found. Klayme did have a Kik account, but cops couldn’t even show that he had accessed the service during the period in question.
After this was pointed out, prosecutors took another look. They agreed that Klayme’s appeal should be allowed. Had the case been properly investigated, the court says now, evidence “would have identified an individual whose first name is Jay whose IP address appears to be in California.”
Apparently the prosecutor has no responsibility to ensure that evidence is real before arguing it in court?
Hopefully this guy at least gets some serious cash for this fuck up.
Searching these devices produced no evidence relevant to the case. Nothing linked Klayme to the girl. No intimate images were found. Klayme did have a Kik account, but cops couldn’t even show that he had accessed the service during the period in question.
And then they want us to follow the law. Fucking fascists.
Police were looking for a man using the Kik messaging service under the name “fus__ro_dah” (two underscores after “fus”), but they accidentally requested records for the username “fus_ro_dah” (one underscore after “fus”). This one-character difference led them not to the perpetrator but to a Canadian man named Brandon Klayme.
Talking of dangerous punctuation, this reminded me of the trial of Roger Casement who was hanged by a comma. The Incorrigible Irishman Who was Hanged by a Comma. Just like today supporting a different country or nationality is little protection if you are an enemy of the powerful
I guess my software development practices are more thorough than the police and prosecution and court here. Rechecking and reaffirming the chain of evidence at least once seems like a minimal baseline and due diligence. Especially when your actions have such a high impact on other people.
Surely the defense lawyer should have been able to spot it as well.
all 16 comments