You can't place a portal on a moving surface in either game, so neither.

This was answered decades ago

According to a gravitationally accurate simulation a guy did for Youtube, the correct answer is_

... ah, ragebait answers only. Well, mission accomplished, probably >:3

Option B. Portals already break a couple of laws of physics and can reverse entropy, but I like to think you should look at the speed of an object relative to the portal.

Niether. Moving surfaces break portals instantaneously.

Portals don’t stay on moving platforms.

But if they did, it would be A as the cube itself has no momentum.

Ragebait answers only

I'm giving so many people Fs on this assignment because you failed to read all the instructions.

The correct answer is B due to the graphical conservation of speed lines.

B.

Momentum/velocity is not an intrinsic property of an object, it is a relative property between two objects in a frame of reference.

Behind the yellow portal is the part of the universe where the blue portal is. The yellow portal, and therefore the space where the blue portal is, has momentum relative to the cube.

Put yourself in the frame of reference of the cube. You see the yellow portal come toward you. Imagine there are objects on the other side of that portal. You see those objects rush toward you through the portal. Why would the objects just stop dead when you came through the portal? (If they did just stop, it would be as though you hit a wall, and you wouldn't actually go through the portal at all.)

If the downward moving portal hits the platform and there is some elastic rebound, then the object will bounce outward slightly.

Rage bait answer: Portals can't exist, it is from a child's game.

"speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out."

So stationary thing goes in, stationary thing comes out.

The object going into the portal has no momentum so it would be A.

The object's momentum is preserved. Movement of the entrance portal does nothing. Think of it like stepping though a door, except you're Buster Keaton and the door hole is falling on you.

Portals aren't real and so work however you want them to, but people rarely consistently apply their models.

I'd say A given how they work in the games though. Only the object's momentum is conserved. The portal doesn't transfer momentum. There may be a slight breeze coming out of the blue end as the column of air in front of the portal-plate is pushed in, but the cube is just going to flop out.

Speedy thing goes in, speedy thing comes out.

Cube had no speed going in, therefore no speed going out. The portal speed is irrelevant

Momentum is conserved when passing through a portal. In the reference frame of the out portal, the object has no momentum, so it plops out.

Speedy thing did not go in

I choose A because that would mean I could use the portal to fuck myself in the ass easier.

If we're only supposed to do ragebait answers, then anyone who passed 3rd grade science would be able to tell you the answer is obviously B

If you actually played the game, and paid attention in physics class in highschool, then you would know the answer is clearly A, and everyone who says it is B really needed the simplified explanation from GLaDOS to understand how to play the game.

The question is: Is it the velocity of the object relative to the portal that matters or the velocity of the object in some other frame of reference?

In the later case, we must ask how the portals at different angles don’t send objects flying off at the speed of the milkyway’s travel through the universe.

The answer that requires the least assumptions and justifications is B.

It went through the portal at speed, so it should exit the portal at speed. That’s my take.

Since nobody seemingly posted link to this absolute ... Idk, gold? It's about actually simulating space(-time?) with portals: https://youtube.com/@optozorax_en I see offspec's comment is mentioning the guy, yeah. Tldr answer is complicated.

...

Ah, ragebait answers only. Ugh, worm! Arrrr! I am so angry roar grrrr.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=B19nlhbA7-E

Not providing a link to alternative platforms is my ragebait

Neither, I've already gleefully incinerated that fucking cube before it got to this point.

Both portals stationary: object velocity unchanged.

Both portals moving at the same speed: object velocity unchanged.

Entry portal moving: object pushed out at the same speed it entered.

Exit portal moving faster than object entered: object explodes.

a. while the portal travels down it collects air, increasing air pressure on the other side, meaning once it reaches the cube, the increased air pressure has mad the air solid so the cube cant fly through it.

My take:

The cube's mass is x (eg one gram) and its velocity is zero, therefore its momentum (m*v) is zero. Objects in motion tend to stay in motion, while objects at rest (e.g. momentum of zero), tend to stay at rest.

The thing which is moving, is the portal. At best, the event horizon of it reaches the leading-end then the trailing-end of the cube at the speed the portal is moving over the depth of the cube. If the portal moves faster, that distance is covered faster, and the full cube is entirely on the other end of the other portal faster [than a slower moving portal].

Since going through the portal is a frictionless and forceless action, the speed at which the portal fully envelops the cube would neither add nor remove momentum upon it. And if the cube did have its own momentum it would be maintained, but since it does not, the cube would not move until another force, like gravity, acted upon it.

So, A.

A, momentum is in the portal, not the cube

A. Object momentum relative to the world is retained thru portals regardless of the speed of the portal surface or the portal itself. The portal is only transmitting matter from A to B, it does not impart energy of any kind.