▲ 423 ▼ Which is it Lemmy? (thelemmy.club) submitted 3 weeks ago by ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world to c/lemmyshitpost@lemmy.world 281 comments fedilink hide all child comments Ragebait answers only
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 125 points 3 weeks ago (5 children) You can't place a portal on a moving surface in either game, so neither. permalink fedilink source hideshow 10 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 77 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) you can in one specific spot in portal 2! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Two, if you count... the big one at the end permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) it doesn't look like it's moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) As far as the game engine is concerned, "stationary" is relative to the... other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shrugs@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago pretty obvious tbh permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago So now we just need to build this test in there and we are set permalink fedilink source parent [–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world [S] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) So the cube is just smashed? It's a practical answer which is slightly upsetting because I wanted more discourse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* No, cubes cannot be destroyed by crushing. The portal disappears when the surface starts moving and then the cube stops the surface's descent. permalink fedilink source parent [–] viertesauge@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) what about the portal on the moon? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Well, everything is moving or not moving, relatively permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 1 point 3 weeks ago* Someone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago It's unstable and will dissipate on its own when the relative displacement between them will be too great. permalink fedilink source parent [–] gnufuu@lemmy.ca 5 points 3 weeks ago Skill issue permalink fedilink source parent [–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) You'd make a horrible scientist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Damnit, you are correct, my bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago Scientists know when to use existing knowledge. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 77 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) you can in one specific spot in portal 2! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Two, if you count... the big one at the end permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) it doesn't look like it's moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) As far as the game engine is concerned, "stationary" is relative to the... other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shrugs@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago pretty obvious tbh permalink fedilink source parent [–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago So now we just need to build this test in there and we are set permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 50 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Two, if you count... the big one at the end permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) it doesn't look like it's moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) As far as the game engine is concerned, "stationary" is relative to the... other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shrugs@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago pretty obvious tbh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] lime@feddit.nu 18 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) it doesn't look like it's moving though. and considering how many things in portal 2 move when they look stationary or vice versa... permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) As far as the game engine is concerned, "stationary" is relative to the... other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shrugs@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago pretty obvious tbh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Sonotsugipaa@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) As far as the game engine is concerned, "stationary" is relative to the... other comparatively big thing: the former big thing is moving very quickly around the latter, even if it looks stationary because it has a lower angular velocity permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] shrugs@piefed.social 6 points 3 weeks ago pretty obvious tbh permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Mika@piefed.ca 2 points 3 weeks ago So now we just need to build this test in there and we are set permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ThatWeirdGuy1001@lemmy.world [S] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) So the cube is just smashed? It's a practical answer which is slightly upsetting because I wanted more discourse. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* No, cubes cannot be destroyed by crushing. The portal disappears when the surface starts moving and then the cube stops the surface's descent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 3 weeks ago* No, cubes cannot be destroyed by crushing. The portal disappears when the surface starts moving and then the cube stops the surface's descent. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] viertesauge@feddit.org 15 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) what about the portal on the moon? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Well, everything is moving or not moving, relatively permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 1 point 3 weeks ago* Someone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory. permalink fedilink source parent [–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago It's unstable and will dissipate on its own when the relative displacement between them will be too great. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] luthis@lemmy.nz 11 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) Well, everything is moving or not moving, relatively permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 1 point 3 weeks ago* Someone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] joelfromaus@aussie.zone 1 point 3 weeks ago* Someone should write a thesis on it (or whatever it’s called). Could call it something like The Relativity Theory. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] alsimoneau@lemmy.ca 4 points 3 weeks ago It's unstable and will dissipate on its own when the relative displacement between them will be too great. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 0 points 3 weeks ago (2 children) You'd make a horrible scientist. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Damnit, you are correct, my bad. permalink fedilink source parent [–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago Scientists know when to use existing knowledge. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TotallynotJessica@lemmy.world 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 child) It said ragebait answers only ¯\_(ツ)_/¯ If it is a question of real life physics, then B would be correct permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Damnit, you are correct, my bad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] rethnor@lemmy.zip 2 points 3 weeks ago Damnit, you are correct, my bad. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kkj@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 3 weeks ago Scientists know when to use existing knowledge. permalink fedilink source parent
