342
submitted 3 days ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/funny@lemmy.ml
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml 2 points 20 hours ago* (last edited 20 hours ago)

Lowering the bar? Put it wherever you want so long as i can drink at it

[-] christian@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 day ago

Holy shit.

At this point I feel ashamed admitting I find this astonishing. Everyone come point and laugh because I'm somehow still not jaded enough.

[-] boaratio@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Usually before I write something stupid I go back and proof read it. Apparently the DOE doesn't do that.

[-] Folstar@lemmus.org 30 points 2 days ago

Growing up in the American education system I met a number of intelligent and decent people. None of them that stayed in this country are doing particularly well professionally. I also met a number of trust fund brats and amoral monsters. They are doing quite well for themselves. This is America.

[-] Kurtismayfield@lemmy.zip 7 points 2 days ago

The lack of morality is a feature.

[-] davetortoise@reddthat.com 37 points 2 days ago

The 1% of solar producing power at night scares me

[-] TheKingBombOmbKiller@lemmy.zip 30 points 2 days ago

Moonlight and starlight is indirect and distant solar power, respectively.

[-] ShinkanTrain@lemmy.ml 11 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Could also be as simple as them using the wrong cutoff time for when the Sun goes down

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

That light has way less than 1% of the intensity of sunlight.

Edit: from here you get that the brightness of moonlight is 0.05 - 0.3 lux whilst that of direct sunlight is 32,000–100,000 lux

Our eyes deceive us (our pupils dilate or contract and we have different more sensitive cells in our retina for seeing in low light conditions) and make it seem brighter than it actually is whilst making sunshine during the day seem less bright than it actually is.

You can use any light of the right frequencies on a solar panel to produce electricity, but the amount of current you can get on a solar panel from moonlight and starlight is minuscule.

My bet is that the 1% comes from things like molten salt solar power plants which during the day use sunlight to heat up some kind of salt (which is used to produce steam that powers a steam turbine), some of which will only be used to actually generate power during the night.

load more comments (20 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] balsoft@lemmy.ml 31 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

As a point of comparison, here's a press release from PRC's government on the same day: https://english.www.gov.cn/news/202607/23/content_WS6a617ed3c6d00ca5f9a0c5e8.html

China is building yet another 300 GW of renewables by 2030, meanwhile the US is struggling to understand the word "solar" in "solar panel".

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 19 points 2 days ago

China is basically the only major economy that invested into making a transition off fossil fuels actually possible.

[-] fodor@lemmy.zip 16 points 2 days ago

The point is to focus on the future. Fossil fuels don't disappear, but new energy sources can replace them in pieces, small or large. Also, equally importantly, personal solar is a life changing tool for millions of people around the world already.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 12 points 2 days ago

For sure, I expect once the process will accelerate now with Gulf energy exports collapsing making it a necessity for a lot of countries. And Pakistan is a great example where people took initiative themselves to start importing the panels, and now there's large scale solar available. This kind of stuff does make me cautiously optimistic.

[-] just2look@lemmy.zip 71 points 3 days ago

Please tell me this isn't a real thing someone published. It really needs to be a joke. My opinion of humanity is so very low, and I don't think I can handle lowering it any further.

[-] tanisnikana@lemmy.world 57 points 3 days ago
[-] danc4498@lemmy.world 58 points 3 days ago

By sunset, despite still high temps, 99% of solar power also failed.

They think high temps is what generates the electricity.

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 24 points 3 days ago

For some of them it actually is, not all are photoelectric.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Solar_power_tower

They have trade offs, like every power solution. One perk is that they generally cleaner to produce, since shiny metal is simpler than modern complex solar panels.

That being said, I have little faith in any report issued under the current administration.

[-] Nindelofocho@lemmy.world 16 points 3 days ago

That still requires sunlight to work…

[-] ricecake@sh.itjust.works 26 points 3 days ago

It requires sunlight to charge, not to produce electricity. Because liquid salt doesn't cool the moment it goes dark the plant can continue to use it to boil water to spin a turbine for a fair bit of time without sunlight. I believe one implementation only produces power at night, and spends the day collecting heat.
But yes, solar power does require sunlight at some point.

It's kinda moot however, because having now read the original post I was correct to assume they (the doe) was being disingenuous. The heat they seemed to be referring to was "the weather". As in "despite the high temperature, the sun still went down causing solar generation to ebb in a predictable fashion that grid operators were unsurprised by. This is why it's good we forced them to keep 150 year old coal plants burning".

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[-] just2look@lemmy.zip 17 points 3 days ago

Damn it. I think that was the last little bit of faith in humanity I had left.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] cogitase@lemmy.dbzer0.com 21 points 3 days ago
[-] cavitationfetishist2@quokk.au 18 points 3 days ago

Remember when the DoE used to be all boring engineers and physicists, not adeptus mechanicus?

load more comments (4 replies)
[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 47 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Incidentally, this is why I'm heavily invested in battery technology.

[-] FrowingFostek@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

Kinda looks like a sunrise 🌅

load more comments (10 replies)
[-] OwOarchist@pawb.social 35 points 3 days ago

Honestly, it's impressive that they still managed 138MW after sunset.

Some of them positioned under bright streetlights or something?

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] apftwb@lemmy.world 37 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Solar

Sunset

If those kids could read meme

Sometimes I wonder if my whole worldview is incorrect. Perhaps I am in an insulated leftist echo chamber. Maybe these people who I have vilified have reasonable positions that I cannot comprehend.

Then I see the Department of Energy lamenting how solar panels failed because they don't work at night.

[-] Ptsf@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

This. Thiiiiiiisssssss. Afajswhakfhid.

[-] CptOblivius@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

Wait until they hear about my car when it has no gas.

[-] Doomsider@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

99% of cars fail without gas in the tank. Obviously the car must be the problem.

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 4 points 2 days ago

not gonna have to wait long the way things are going in the Gulf

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 21 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

US education

4th Grade School Textbook

[-] AdolfSchmitler@lemmy.world 12 points 2 days ago

That's from a private religious education textbook. It is not representative of the U.S. education system.

[-] Zerush@lemmy.ml 10 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Yes, but a big part of the population in the US are in school with this and similar. I remember an interview with a passerby in Alabama, I think, asking him about climate change caused by pollution. Answer: It Is a big lie that man can change anything in God's Creation.

The US Bubble

Autoritarian govs only can work with ignorant citizens, religion is always usefull for it. Search: List of Banned Books in US Schools.

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] mycodesucks@lemmy.world 34 points 3 days ago

Sun Sets

Republicans: Huddle nervously in the darkness uncertain if the magic sky fire will ever return.

[-] grrgyle@slrpnk.net 9 points 2 days ago

Is this real? Is this really as dumb as it seems?

[-] yogthos@lemmy.ml 6 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

yup it's real and it's exactly as dumb as it looks

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 21 points 3 days ago

I'm wondering how that 1% remained operating?

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2026
342 points (98.0% liked)

Share Funny Videos, Images, Memes, Quotes and more

3326 readers
59 users here now

#funny

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS