▲ 354 ▼ American education system in action everybody (thelemmy.club) submitted 1 month ago by yogthos@lemmy.ml to c/funny@lemmy.ml 110 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] N0t_5ure@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago (4 children) I'm wondering how that 1% remained operating? permalink fedilink source hideshow 8 child comments replies: [–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 child) Moonlight permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child) 138 MW generated from moonlight is insane to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago I’m investing in lunar power now permalink fedilink source parent [–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago Best guess, sunset is being defined as a specific time. Sunset isn't necessarily the point at which all sunlight is gone, and even then, the time the sun goes down varies depending on where you are within a given time zone. If they just used an arbitrary time or an almanac listing for twilight for each day, they could easily end up including slivers of daylight in their post sunset data. Which is really pointless since this is just the same old "BuT sOlAr DoEsN't WoRk At NiGhT" argument that idiots have been making for decades. But I suppose you gotta at least pretend to use real world data to make it look sciencey. permalink fedilink source parent [–] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago Could be residual energy generation from the few operating concentrated solar power stations (generating great by reflecting sunlight and that heat persists for a time) permalink fedilink source parent [+] someguy3@lemmy.world -21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Had to rely on Google AI for this (downvote all you want but good luck trying to find this without it), but it says dusk/dawn can produce 0.1% to 0.01% capacity. But inverters for DC to AC have a minimum threshold so it's nothing. So not that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Firstly: I'm not the downvoter. Secondly: you didn't have to - you chose to. And as most chatbots list sources, you can always check them out yourself and cut out the middleman. Most of academia - some 45% do that. Another 45% don't even bother. A lone 10% still do things the old fashioned way. In any case, you're not alone in relying on AI to find obscure information. With search engines becoming increasingly infested with low-quality and obvious-slop sites, relying on the same methods as the slopmasters isn't even a big stain on your morality. Because of it was, the slopmasters would be drowning in the ink required, and billionaires would already have caused another biblical flood of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children) Did you know that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) 60% of the time it works every time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago* Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) Thank God we had you here to tell us what the slop machine sharted out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You're welcome! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 month ago (1 child) Moonlight permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child) 138 MW generated from moonlight is insane to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago I’m investing in lunar power now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] apftwb@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago* (1 child) 138 MW generated from moonlight is insane to me. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago I’m investing in lunar power now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] reallykindasorta@slrpnk.net 8 points 1 month ago I’m investing in lunar power now permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Makeitstop@lemmy.world 12 points 1 month ago Best guess, sunset is being defined as a specific time. Sunset isn't necessarily the point at which all sunlight is gone, and even then, the time the sun goes down varies depending on where you are within a given time zone. If they just used an arbitrary time or an almanac listing for twilight for each day, they could easily end up including slivers of daylight in their post sunset data. Which is really pointless since this is just the same old "BuT sOlAr DoEsN't WoRk At NiGhT" argument that idiots have been making for decades. But I suppose you gotta at least pretend to use real world data to make it look sciencey. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bonesawmcl@lemmy.world 1 point 1 month ago Could be residual energy generation from the few operating concentrated solar power stations (generating great by reflecting sunlight and that heat persists for a time) permalink fedilink source parent
[+] someguy3@lemmy.world -21 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children) Had to rely on Google AI for this (downvote all you want but good luck trying to find this without it), but it says dusk/dawn can produce 0.1% to 0.01% capacity. But inverters for DC to AC have a minimum threshold so it's nothing. So not that. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Firstly: I'm not the downvoter. Secondly: you didn't have to - you chose to. And as most chatbots list sources, you can always check them out yourself and cut out the middleman. Most of academia - some 45% do that. Another 45% don't even bother. A lone 10% still do things the old fashioned way. In any case, you're not alone in relying on AI to find obscure information. With search engines becoming increasingly infested with low-quality and obvious-slop sites, relying on the same methods as the slopmasters isn't even a big stain on your morality. Because of it was, the slopmasters would be drowning in the ink required, and billionaires would already have caused another biblical flood of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children) Did you know that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) 60% of the time it works every time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago* Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) Thank God we had you here to tell us what the slop machine sharted out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You're welcome! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 28 points 1 month ago* (1 child) Firstly: I'm not the downvoter. Secondly: you didn't have to - you chose to. And as most chatbots list sources, you can always check them out yourself and cut out the middleman. Most of academia - some 45% do that. Another 45% don't even bother. A lone 10% still do things the old fashioned way. In any case, you're not alone in relying on AI to find obscure information. With search engines becoming increasingly infested with low-quality and obvious-slop sites, relying on the same methods as the slopmasters isn't even a big stain on your morality. Because of it was, the slopmasters would be drowning in the ink required, and billionaires would already have caused another biblical flood of it. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children) Did you know that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) 60% of the time it works every time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago* Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Entertainmeonly@lemmy.blahaj.zone 13 points 1 month ago (2 children) Did you know that 87% of all statistics are made up on the spot? permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) 60% of the time it works every time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent [–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago* Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Asafum@lemmy.world 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) 60% of the time it works every time permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] orbituary@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 1 month ago (1 child) 49% of us think we're not divided. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prex@aussie.zone 5 points 1 month ago Half the population can't read statistics and the other third choose not to. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] unwarlikeExtortion@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago* Academia calls these heuristics, not statistics. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 month ago (1 child) Thank God we had you here to tell us what the slop machine sharted out. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You're welcome! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) You're welcome! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago (1 child) It was sarcasm. Next time keep that shit to yourself. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 child) It was?!?!? Rudeness from ml?!? Well I never! permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Nonconfrontational@lemmy.ml 1 point 1 month ago AI slop garbage defenders from .world!? Who'da thunk it? permalink fedilink source parent