49
Trump administration weighing military options in Mali (www.washingtonpost.com)
submitted 3 months ago by to c/chapotraphouse@hexbear.net
15 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

archive

all 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 36 points 3 months ago

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 33 points 3 months ago

    Just one more front bro I swear we'll be great again bro trust me.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 28 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yes, attack as many places as possible and spread your military as thin as possible. I'm sure that will work out well for you.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 9 points 3 months ago

    Actually, I'd say that it's worked out pretty well for Trump:

    • He's made billions of dollars
    • Most news orgs have stopped talking about him and Epstein
    • He's got the authority to give a bunch of handouts to his friends spend a lot more on the military
    • He's given the military a lot of practice on foreign operatives, which he can turn around and use on his citizens
  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 25 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, keep sending troops closer to the equator as the world continues to heat up. And open up more fronts to drop your bombs that you can't restock fast enough. Military genius here, modern Sun Tzu.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 23 points 3 months ago* (6 children)

    Huh?? Why would the US start attacking JNIM? They literally arm them through Saudi Arabia and even enjoy Ukrainian support?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
    •
  • [–] 22 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    1. Gives you an excuse to indiscriminately deploy your military to an anti-imperialist state and confederation

    2. Trump genuinely believes the US is against Islamo-Terrorists and likes to press buttons to blow them up

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Could it be that they're seeing Mali government will win against the JNIM and they're trying to collaborate in the victory to share the spoils, as they did with WW2 and the western front when they saw the Nazis were losing to the soviets?

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
    •
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    This makes sense, but less about sharing in the victory to get the spoils than placing US troops there with some popular support that can let them stay. The US's ideal situation for the AES is that they never return to the French military umbrella but come under the American one.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    I mean, yeah, letting them stay afterwards is the spoils, as in western Europe after ww2: install friendly regimes and military bases

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Hopefully the Malian leadership sees the game. They did with France, and if they're really getting a handle on the JNIM situation with Afrika Corps, then they should have no need for US support.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
    • [–] 17 points 3 months ago*

    Literally 4 days ago, Russia said the situation in Mali was "developing in encouraging direction" due to military victories, rapprochement with Algeria, and a potential negotiated settlement with the Tuareg rebels. In case you're wondering why...

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 7 points 3 months ago

    Trump admin just keeps starting side quests without finishing their main one first.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •
    [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    Sure, why not

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
    •