top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 203 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’m not a big fan of the high fees, but I’m even less of a fan of big developers being treated differently than the little guy.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 52 points 2 years ago (5 children)

    Some banks do this *** too. The more money you deposit, the less fees you pay. Because 'premium customer' and all this.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Yep Chase for instance: over 75k on deposit, no ATM withdrawal fees anywhere! You know, helping the people who need it the least.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 2 years ago (8 children)

    Sorry for the ignorance, but you have to pay to withdraw money from your bank in the US?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    Some banks? No. All banks.

    Even credit unions do this. They may not have as many or as expensive fees as regular commercial banks but they still have fees and certain features aren't free. If you deposit $100,000 (or more) you'll find that a lot of those fees get waived, your interest rates will be better, and they will generally treat you better than the peasants with like $5,000 in their savings.

    It's just another advantage that the rich have over every day people. Most of them take these things for granted or don't think they matter in the slightest. It never occurs to them that regular $3 fees or occasional $25 fees can have a huge impact on the poor and the middle class.

    Full Disclosure: I work for a bank.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (3 replies)
  • [+] 103 points 2 years ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (24 children)
  • [–] 38 points 2 years ago (6 children)

    In effect, yes. Given that ~70% of revenue goes to rights holders, making the amount of revenue bigger by not paying 30% of subscriptions to Google, the savings are passed on to rights holders.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    So, not exactly to the artists. I get the impression you seem to know quite a lot about the deal, can you try to analyze how this 70% gets divided?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
  • load more comments (23 replies)
    [–] 95 points 2 years ago (3 children)

    No fees when users choose to pay via Spotify (which had been the case and only option since the beginning, until User Choice Billing was implemented).

    If users choose to pay with Google Play Billing, Google keeps 4%.

    Even so, what I find hypocritical is that Spotify got this deal and seemingly agreed to keep it under wraps, without advocating for it to be extended to all other music streaming services in the platform.

    Because... having a deal with the platform holder that gives it unfair advantage over the competition is exactly what they accuse Apple of doing with iOS.

    Sauce: https://www.theverge.com/2023/11/20/23969690/google-spotify-android-billing-commission-secret-deal

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 58 points 2 years ago (1 child)
  • [–] 45 points 2 years ago

    We're totally screwing the artist, so we'll give you a cut if we don't pay any gees.

  • source
  • [–] 43 points 2 years ago

    Yea no shit, idk if it's just for my region or what, but Spotify does not manage their subscription through the play store. Makes it more annoying to cancel it too, which the execs at Spotify probably see as a plus.

  • source
  • [–] 41 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    Kind of weird, considering they're a major competitor, but so what? Why is this something they need to "admit"?

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 2 years ago

    Netflix makes heavy use of Amazon Web Services, specifically S3 Buckets. I’m sure there’s a special deal worked out with them as an anchor client.

    Malls do the same thing. While they’re not in direct competition in the same sense as Google/Spotify or Amazon/Netflix, some stores don’t even pay rent in a mall because it’s expected that they’ll drive traffic to the rest of the stores. 90% sure Victoria’s Secret, Macy’s, etc are some of these anchor stores that very often pay little or negative rent due to the sheer revenue generated by other avenues.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 2 years ago (20 children)

    What alternatives do you guys use besides Bandcamp? I am open to paying a sub as long as the artist is getting a decent cut.

  • source
  • hideshow 22 child comments
  • load more comments (18 replies)
    [–] 14 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 child)

    Idk if Bandcamp is better, but there I buy my beloved albums with a big tip. The only thing I dislike is many artists default to PayPal for their merch. Ah, and they got owned by someone like Tencent or Epic?

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 11 points 2 years ago

    Its not a bug, its a feature. The end game has lots of backdoor deals.

  • source
  • [–] [B] 7 points 2 years ago

    This is the best summary I could come up with:


    The details surfaced today after Google requested the court to keep the specifics of its deal with Spotify sealed earlier in the month.

    This fee could be reduced to 11% due to programs like user choice billing, which allows developers to use their own or third-party payment solutions.

    Earlier this month, The Verge reported that the search giant offered Netflix a deal in 2017 to just pay a 10% fee on Play Store for subscriptions.

    Last month, the Mountain View-based company reached a settlement with Match Group to let the dating app giant use third-party billing solutions on the Play Store.

    Match Group’s rival Bumble was part of the user choice billing program pilot started in November 2022.

    Epic, however, rejected Google’s offers to adopt user choice billing and went to trial earlier this month.


    The original article contains 382 words, the summary contains 135 words. Saved 65%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 years ago (1 child)

    I'm doing great with xManager so I don't give a flying fuck about this haha

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›