top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [M] 55 points 2 months ago (214 children)

Imma pin this one up for now.

Please remember the rule on celebrating death. Graham was an asshole, that should be enough.

In March 2016, Graham said: "I want you to use my words against me. If there's a Republican president in 2016 and a vacancy occurs in the last year of the first term, you can say Lindsey Graham said let's let the next president, whoever it might be, make that nomination." [1, 2]

  • source
  • hideshow 214 child comments
  • [–] 95 points 2 months ago (148 children)

    What, pray tell, is the “rule” about celebrating death? It couldn’t possibly be some absolute Reddit shit, could it?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 148 child comments
  • [+] [M] -59 points 2 months ago (143 children)

    Sidebar rule 6:

    "No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning."

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 143 child comments
  • [–] 65 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (99 children)

    Any good justification for this rule you can think of?

    (Also… weird that you’re not actually enforcing it? Is it a “rule” or not?)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 99 child comments
  • [+] [M] -69 points 2 months ago (85 children)

    Basic humanity? Graham lacked it, doesn't mean we should.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 85 child comments
  • [–] 105 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (36 children)

    So if we celebrated hitler's death we lack humanity? People should be free to celebrate a death if they feel to. Forcing your idea of a moral code over people is not nice. We are not talking about celebrating violence, a crime or wishing for somebody's death.

    People should be free to express their feelings if they don't hurt anyone, without having to fear the morality police. The point of modorators should be to create a welcoming and safe space, not to impose your morality on others.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 36 child comments
  • load more comments (14 replies)
  • [–] 68 points 2 months ago (11 children)

    Jesus fucking Christ. We’re really doing this high road virtue signaling bullshit here, too? Cool. Continue being part of the problem, I guess.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • load more comments (33 replies)
  • load more comments (13 replies)
  • load more comments (42 replies)
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • [–] 66 points 2 months ago (29 children)
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (35 replies)
    [–] [M] 4 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    I think Jordan covered the rule existing and not to break it, but I'd like to discuss why it's there to hopefully make this more transparent. Especially since Mitch may be croaking soon also (or already did, who knows?)

    Rule 6 is a necessary evil. The reason is that websites which are truly off the rails are often singled out. A mostly leftist forum would be even more likely to be targeted. Community mods should on occasion think what would these posts look like on an FBI filing, or on a hit piece on the DSA for example. Not the same morally, but famously many nationalist/racist sites have been targeted and then had their hosting or ddos protection revoked because of content on the site calling for death or celebrating it with their rules and enforcements having no such limitations.

    Different levels of extremes than here obviously, but the corporate landscape and justice dept is not on our side here and so interpretations which seem obvious to you may not be made before damage has been done.

    Above all, mods have a responsibility to not create problems for the site that hosts their coms, regardless of deserved or undeserved protection on someone's legacy.

    Besides, it's just as easy to say, "Warmonger Graham: Never an offensive war he didn't support, never a dollar from Israel he didn't immediately allow into his decision making process, never a brown person he didn't want to kill. He has obtained what he wanted most for others, death. He can now start his final battle without his mortal coil, to start a regime change in hell."

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 150 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    in February, he called himself the president’s “north star.”

    Shine on, Lindsey. Show him the way.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 112 points 2 months ago (19 children)

    Actually this is massive, massive news. The republican primaries are already over in SC. Given his sudden death likely nobody was prepping a campaign (Graham was already running for re-election). They're gonna have to have a special primary in just a few weeks, and only a few months to build and win a campaign.

    Huge huge opportunity for Dems.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 101 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    Geez... they'll really do anything to distract from Mitch being dead

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 74 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    I'm sorry to hear it was brief.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 74 points 2 months ago (5 children)

    Wow! Not the one I thought it would be

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 58 points 2 months ago (28 children)

    Wow! Mitch Mcconnell and Lindsey Graham in the same year? The world is indeed slowly starting to heal! Now do Fat Donnie and Erdogone, and I'll throw a party.

  • source
  • hideshow 28 child comments
  • load more comments (28 replies)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›