530
submitted 22 hours ago by artyom@piefed.social to c/privacy@lemmy.ml

If you're not familiar with the LEGO scandal, the tl;dw is that this YouTuber Reckless Ben (Ben Schneider) has been investigating a stolen set of LEGO worth ~$100-200k (depending on who you ask) and the local police dept and criminal justice system has been colluding with the criminals (all members of the local Mormon church) to get him to STFU. The long version is, very long. You can check his channel for more.

Previously the local police dept managed to get a warrant to raid Ben's rental home with guns drawn and arrest him, based on what is clearly fabricated evidence. Here they appear to have done it again to get access to his Google account.

The linked video is mirrored on Peertube and timestamped to the relevant section.

Ben does also provide a copy of the subpoena in the video but I cannot vouch for its' validity, and he has used placeholder evidence before, but that's neither here nor there.

Anyway, the part that was relevant to this community was that in the course of their investigation they subpoenaed Google, and Google handed over basically his entire life to them. I'm sure this was very useful in their investigation.

I don't necessarily blame Google here for complying with a subpoena, but the moral of the story is to stop giving Google your data, because everything you say and do can and will be used against you in a court of law, with or without legitimate justification, and the more stuff you give them, the more ammunition you're providing the prosecutor.

This is also not exclusive to Google. Anything not local, self-hosted or encrypted a la Proton can be subpoenaed and the provider will have to comply. It just so happens that Google probably has more information about literally everyone in the world than any other particular entity.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] mcv@lemmy.zip 20 points 7 hours ago* (last edited 7 hours ago)

The lesson here is not to trust Google or other non-encrypted storage with your stuff. There are email providers that are more protective of your stuff, but more than that: don't store everything in one place. That way if one account is compromised, not everything is exposed. And American companies are more likely to share your data than European ones.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 6 points 6 hours ago

Yes I did say that but thank you for reiterating.

[-] BouteilleBrune@lemmy.world 15 points 8 hours ago

it would seem their whole legal system is as corrupt as their government

[-] Mulligrubs@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago* (last edited 6 hours ago)

I live here, and yes, it's corrupt.

It has been for at least 50 years, now most of all. It's not as blatant as some countries re open bribery, but our "news" sources have been owned by the bourgeoisie since at least the 90s, every year they bought up more and more smaller, local news sources; now only a few remain, all firmly under control.

Abuses of power are rampant, just not reported often. So we have more room for Kanye coverage, two-page spread

[-] AlteredEgo@lemmy.ml 9 points 8 hours ago

So is the youtuber the one who got his lego stolen? Or is he just a journalist reporting on this story?

[-] Brkdncr@lemmy.world 5 points 4 hours ago

Ben is a YouTube entertainer that found out about this situation. He’s more activist than journalist. I think the original owner sold the collection to Ben.

[-] Vendetta9076@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 hours ago

The original owner didn't sell it to anyone. It was on consignment with Bricks n Minifigs. Hence the whole issue to begin with.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago

There was some «sale» as a part of the process. But yeah.

[-] megopie@beehaw.org 7 points 8 hours ago

He’s reporting on it and trying to help the victim get restitution.

load more comments (1 replies)
[-] phoenixz@lemmy.ca 57 points 14 hours ago

Just as an fyi, if you'd self hosted your services, they would probably subpoena you, and you would be obligated to give them all your data from your own server, and if you'd refus, your be in deep, deep shit

It doesn't matter where you store data, if it's stored, it can be used

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 7 points 4 hours ago

"Well boys I sure hope you can get in to this because I lost the password ages ago I remember it was a set of 15 random words with capitals in random spots but just can't remember the order..."

Then your lawyer gets to tell the jury that you complied.

[-] yetAnotherUser@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 4 hours ago

How so? You cannot be forced to accuse yourself. If your self-hosted data is on encrypted hard drives then they can't do anything about it.

Except in the UK where you can be forced to provide decryption keys.

[-] renrenPDX@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 hours ago

They’ll just come in and take ALL your PC/server hardware and hold it as evidence. Preferably with a warrant, but if they “fear” that you may destroy evidence, they can seize everything regardless of warrant. If you’re legally ordered to decrypt and refuse to do so, you’ll be held in contempt of court and probably jailed/fined for who knows how long.

[-] mic_check_one_two@lemmy.dbzer0.com 42 points 12 hours ago

And that’s where good encryption comes into play. At least in the US, (where this case is happening), they can compel you to turn over the encrypted data blob. But they can’t compel you to give them the password to access the data. Because forcing you to give up the password would violate your 5th amendment right to remain silent.

Also, they probably wouldn’t subpoena you and give you a chance to respond; they would just bust your front door down and take your server. You wouldn’t have an opportunity to peacefully turn the data over to them. Only the wealthy get subpoenas. The rest of us get no-knock search warrants, dead pets, (because cops will shoot any dogs that are present when they execute the warrant), and traumatized/injured/killed family members who happened to be home at the time.

[-] Upgrayedd1776@sh.itjust.works 7 points 7 hours ago

they respected the lemon pound cake tho...

[-] TwistedTurtle@sh.itjust.works 11 points 13 hours ago

I imagine it'd still be preferable to make them go through you and your lawyer for that info, where you could still have some measure of control.

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 9 points 13 hours ago

You’re half right, in that ultimately they can compel you to hand over your data, but there is a higher bar to clear for them to get your personal data stored locally.

For one, they can’t compel you to turn over your data with a subpoena, they’d have to actually go in front of a judge and get a warrant.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago

Probably wouldn’t be very hard to get from what i can see in this case

[-] EncryptKeeper@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

It would at least be harder, and have real constitutional ramifications. But yes, ultimately if there’s enough corruption they will get their hands on the data

load more comments (2 replies)
[-] potate@lemmy.ca 8 points 10 hours ago

Damn, I hadn't heard about this but that video is a wild ride...

[-] Meatwagon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 48 points 15 hours ago

I've been following this and he keeps making so many mistakes. Stop talking to the police, bro. Stop trying to get the shop owner on camera.

File lawsuits against the company (I know he tried and the cop refused to issue the summons illegally, so you do it again after filing a complaint against the police), and file every lawsuit possible outside of that district.

But that's not good views for YouTube. He just keeps giving them more ammunition to go after him.

[-] bridgeenjoyer@sh.itjust.works 32 points 14 hours ago* (last edited 14 hours ago)

Lawsuits do no good when they are invisible. He's exposed insane police and judge corruption that would be swept under the rug becuase of no exposure. If utah decides they dont like you or me, we would be fucked, in jail for made up lies, becuase we dont have millions of people watching.

Yes he has also done some dumb shit for sure.

[-] cunnililgus@sopuli.xyz 13 points 12 hours ago

After he got forcibly muted by court I believe he finally spoke to lawyers and then he won pretty quick.

I suspect he was playing 4D chess, and decided to show what your chances are in the system if you play it by the book and alone, which most people who can't afford a lawyer would do, and what also the thieves relied on. They told the victim directly try to sue us and you'll end up paying more in lawyer costs.

[-] ulkesh@piefed.social 17 points 13 hours ago

the local police dept and criminal justice system has been colluding with the criminals (all members of the local Mormon church)

Sounds about on par for the corrupt, death cult religionists. Quick! Someone steal their magic underwear and ransom it back to them for the LEGOs!

[-] nitroemdash@lemmy.wtf 8 points 12 hours ago

Is this the same Provo that had the ugliest flag ever?

[-] pingveno@lemmy.world 2 points 2 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

Yes, the vitamin flag. But Pocatello, Idaho had a far uglier flag. Both have very nice replacement flags after receiving negative attention.

[-] dasrael@lemmy.zip 13 points 14 hours ago

Some jack off corrupt podunk cop shop can clearly ubpoena your entire life if you piss off the wrong person, then fabricate charges or create circumstances to fuck your life. This is here, now. Reclaim your digital sovereignty from big tech...

[-] tempest@lemmy.ca 38 points 17 hours ago

Given the US is currently rotting from the top down and the bottom up I wonder if this guy will get lucky and find some help from the middle that isn't yet so corrupt.

[-] marxismtomorrow@lemmy.today 25 points 16 hours ago

He has a civil rights lawyer with a youtube channel helping him on the criminal charges and has hired some other lawyer to help with the civil charges (hence the move for those to federal court). So he's getting there.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online -2 points 6 hours ago

I'm not entirely clear on why this guy stuck out his neck so far over a situation that was never his to deal with in the first place.

[-] DanceMomsSavedMe@lemmy.zip 11 points 4 hours ago

I mean just so you know this dude is making bucks off of YouTube views. Now, idk it its like a boatload of money but he is compensated for his time that way.

That said though imagine how bleak the world would be if no one stuck their neck out for anyone over something that didn't involve them. We should all try to help the common man if we can.

[-] Evotech@lemmy.world 1 points 2 hours ago
[-] artyom@piefed.social 4 points 5 hours ago

Its his job?

[-] Zephorah@discuss.online 115 points 21 hours ago

It’s good to have reminders of what is and isn’t private.

Google accounts aren’t “free”.

load more comments
view more: next ›
this post was submitted on 09 Jul 2026
530 points (99.1% liked)

Privacy

49676 readers
1273 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS