laws should change to make landlording uneconomical so they release those houses back into the market, lowering the prices.
no pity for those parasites
laws should change to make landlording uneconomical so they release those houses back into the market, lowering the prices.
no pity for those parasites
The laws of economics are more volatile than some fantasy books' magic systems (Brandon Sanderson my beloved)
"laws" like economics isn't a psudo science.
Any serious economics professor will acknowledge that all the economic "laws" they teach you are basically for illustrative purposes. "Market forces" only behave as described in a perfectly free market, with perfect information on both sides of a transaction, no coercion, no monopolies, and perfectly rational participants.
I compare it to basic physics: you learn how perfectly inelastic, frictionless spheres behave, for simplicity. But perfectly inelastic, frictionless spheres aren't real, so real experiments aren't going to match your basic formulas. Likewise, economic laws fall apart as soon as you try to apply them to the real world.
At least in physics you then learn the approximations and the use cases where your formulas do work
The problem is that it's basically impossible to isolate economic phenomena. You can conduct a gravity experiment in a vacuum tube, but you can't make an economic vacuum tube.
And yet you can still use the basic formula for gravitational movement to calculate stuff with enough precision for everyday life.
Kinda worse tbh, because it used to be landlords would have to arrange a group call where they'd conspire to fuck us. Now it's done by companies like RealPage automatically.
Economics, as an intellectual discipline, is closer to theology than physics. Its power is proportional to the belief it commands.
Finance is an arbitrary subset of accounting and mathematics, cherry picked by the owning class, and applied as their supporting mythology.
It’s an entirely imaginary construct, which means alternatives are only ever a conjuring away.
yea, especially if someone owns half the rentable housing. they can then effectively control rent pricing. and if they own that much then they can often directly affect the marked.
They don't even really need to wait. Check out the lawsuit against RealPage. https://topclassactions.com/lawsuit-settlements/investigations/realpage-lawsuit/
Remember, you can create a housing co-op. Yes, it is a lot of work, but it will be a net good for society. (I have a strong and incorrect impression that this would be me giving money away. We need WAY more cooperative economic education.)
Also, you can marry a friend just to qualify for a mortgage (pre-nups!). Also, buying housing with friends is a thing.
You can identify a leftist who understands economics with a simple test question: "what are the effects of rent controls?"
What are the effects of rent controls?
I will bite. Not unlike an increase in minimum wage, it increases competition at the margin among landlords, which increases amenities, and encourages families and economic activity. It needs to also be accompanied by enforcement of landlord citations as well as empty housing penalties though in order to have its full effect of reversing the trend of out of state management of private residential property and encourages self-ownership over time and better landlords. The empty housing penalties are because the landlords primary use of the properties is capital and so an empty unit is often more profitable in value than the cost of it sitting empty. Laws need to tip the scale to increase supply of housing and force their hands to release it back to people who can take on personal responsibility of the unit, whether that be a next door landlord or ideally a rent to own tenant or owner living there.
You did not mention the crucial unintended effect of rent controls.
all 32 comments