top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 232 points 3 months ago (52 children)

7zip is better anyway I don't understand why people still use WinRar. Then again I don't understand why people still use Windows either.

  • source
  • hideshow 52 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Or WinZip. I work for a company that literally has the licenses for every computer they own. Why? 7-zip is free.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (8 replies)
    [–] 96 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (8 children)

    ITT: The most politically charged discussion of compression software I've ever read...

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 34 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    FOSS users when there's a software that's free but not open source

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 13 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I make software that’s almost “open source” with the only limitation being that you can’t resell it. I’ve had FOSS users tell me they’d prefer it being proprietary.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 61 points 3 months ago (16 children)

    I own a valid WinRAR license!

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago* (7 children)

    Same. I've happily used it for over 2 decades and decided that they actually deserve some money for that. I've since switched to Linux, but don't regret paying for WinRAR at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago*

    Ever since i found out that there is a yearly subscription for winrar on android, ive been paying for it.

    I dont even use winrar anymore but it gives the same satisfaction as donating to wikipedia, and its just a few bucks so why not

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 58 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    anyone who still distributes anything compressed with winrar, please just fucking stop

    use it for your personal archival purposes if you must, but please just fucking stop using it to share or distribute anything publicly. there's zero reason to use .rar over 7z or zip or tgz or any other open standard

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (7 replies)
    [–] 50 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Shhh you're a free software

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
    [–] 43 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Was expecting this to be an Onion article

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 30 points 3 months ago

    Pay for independently-developed software if you care about it continuing to exist. Steal from corporations all you want. But support independent devs (and small teams) to make sure they can keep maintaining the tools you love and rely on. It's the only way to not get swallowed by the big dogs.

  • source
  • [–] 29 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    RAR files just make me "Huh?" as they are nowhere near as good as 7zip, as universal as zip, or as nice as tarballs.

    The memory of multi-part rar files being a good way to get big things voer dial-up is kinda long past, they're a relic, in my book.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago

    I think theyre still popular on Usenet.

    IDK all the history but rar has built in ability to create recovery data / parity volumes.

    Parity data is like additional data that can help reconstruct any degradation.

    That said, usually a standalone parity generator is used which can work with other types of archives, but rar is what everyone uses so why change.

    Compression algos are ineffective on encoded / compressed media anyway.

    It used to be important on Usenet, and maybe still is, because if a drive starts to fail somewhere and contains errors those errors can be reproduced across the network. Not sure if thats still a thing or why but certainly 10 years ago it was.

    The summary to this rambling comment is: some communities still like rar because its what they've always used and there's no benefit to adopting 7z.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (3 replies)
    [–] 22 points 3 months ago

    I've never used WinRAR. I'm a 7-zip fanatic user.

  • source
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Its big companies that screw them the most. I have worked for multiple multi billion dollar corporations that will screw Team Viewer over even though its how we get customers into their down servers. And it wasn't one data center, its every data center I have ever worked in (30 years in)

    If the license is free, they will screw them.

    *I know TV hasn't been around that long, but WinRAR has been and it was another company I saw screwed.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 16 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Makes sense. People finally have tons of disposable income to spread around. /S

    Or maybe is just that everything else is so ridiculously expensive that WinRAR seems like a good deal now.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next ›