all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[+] 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The problem with the military being a necessary evil is that your own military ends up being the evil that forces others to have their own necessary evil.

    Not saying the military shouldn't exist, but we should be way more careful about who ends up running it and what we let them do. Before you know it, unelected officials end up running meetings that choose where they go and who they bomb, based on intelligence gathered from other unelected officials and corporations.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

    Having a military is necessary.

    But using it for anything other than strictly defending your own territory is not necessary. An ethical military would never set foot in any other country unless that country attacked them first (or specifically requested aid in defending themselves from a different country).

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    The US military is evil. There, I fixed it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    There is a little bit of nuance in there...

    For millenials at least, a lot of us grew up with Boomer parents, who saw a very defensive military. Fighting for us against foes who truly wished harm upon us (i.e. Nazis/Axis). These were folks you could proudly look up to.

    Whereas what more modern generations have grown up with is an offensive military, which seemingly goes out of its way to create conflict. Not to defend us, but to defend the interests of the rich - including fighting the very public whose tax money funds said military.

    And there's no better proof of this than people's opinion of Ukraine's military (outside of tankies) versus the US military.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    When I was younger, I believed this. But defending innocent people from invading forces is an honorable thing.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 2 months ago

    It's a bit more difficult when your building gets bombed and now your wife and child are dead and it will keep happening unless you do something about it.

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    addendum: im also down for any war on, like, measles or the flu or something we can win merely by vaccinating our population. and war on dirty energy. and war on bad coffee. you know what, bad tasting food altogether everyone deserves a party in their mouth AT ALL TIMES. scratch that, two parties in every mouth and one car in every lake

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    idk, killing fascists for example is pretty solid in my book

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • If you give societies full of amoral, self-centered, antisocial and nihilistic sharp pens, they might try to stab their way into riches and comfort. The way I see it, either humanity will develop into a group that can be trusted, because of ideology and personal decision (you've seen what happens when they just follow their basest desires), with power or it will drive itself extinct.

    I'm saying this in a very uhh "politically correct" way but the vast majority of people understand Western imperialism is the enemy of humanity and most of those suffer it everyday. We will survive the West and the West will change its ways or the West will parasitise and corrupt everything before engaging in autophagy.

  • source