37
top 11 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Treczoks@lemmy.world 7 points 1 week ago
[-] NeatNit@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago

eye roll

upvote

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 6 points 1 week ago

The full video isn't much longer and has a few more jokes.

[-] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

TIL. Didn't consider black holes could be that small.

[-] waldfee@feddit.org 6 points 1 week ago

Technically all objects have an event horizon, the special feature of black holes is just that they are actually smaller than their event horizon

[-] Successful_Try543@feddit.org 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Every object has a Schwarzschild radius, but only if ~~objects are~~ an object is smaller than ~~their~~ its own Schwarzschild radius (black holes) it defines an event horizon, i.e. by all means of physics, we cannot "see" what is going on inside.

[-] Kolanaki@pawb.social 6 points 1 week ago

They supposedly make microscopic ones all the time in particle colliders, but they dissipate almost immediately.

[-] davidgro@lemmy.world 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

My understanding is that was the 'fear' if certain parts of string theory were right and had certain parameters, but it didn't happen (ruling those out)

[-] cynar@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

We are not there yet. Some of the theories put the energy requirements within reach of the LHC. They were at the extremes of possibilities however, and none have been detected so far.

[-] robocall@lemmy.world 1 points 1 week ago

Wouldn't that ruin the Earth's tidal system and like destroy life on earth? Idk

[-] Xaphanos@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

Actually...

No. The mass doesn't change. And a uniform sphere at distance is identical to a point as far as gravity is concerned.

this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2026
37 points (95.1% liked)

xkcd

16890 readers
39 users here now

A community for a webcomic of romance, sarcasm, math, and language.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS