cross-posted from: https://feddit.org/post/31597508

Great timing and phrasing. "Be slow about slop development ooor.. Burn everyone and everything!"

all 26 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 92 points 2 months ago (6 children)

And they expect us to choose data centers? Fucked up. And our elites are corrupt enough to do just that ...

  • source
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago* (5 children)

    Bezos literally said that once AI is good enough, it will solve all our problems.

    That's what they believe, or at least want us to believe.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] [S] 11 points 2 months ago (4 children)

    Bezos: "it will solve all our problems."

    Wow.

    That is not optimism - it is religious fervor.

    That has become a religion, or it might be more apt to say, a cult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    That cult is called Longtermism prominently supported by all your favorite tech feudal lords.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] [S] 36 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (4 children)

    What I find interesting is that a lot of these changes which are attributed to the purportedly "inevitable" changes associated with AI (or partly with its not-adoption), are real consequences of climate change.

    • loss of employment? Check.
    • profound change to living conditions? Check.
    • loss of labour productivity - including knowledge work? Check.
    • threathening the stability of the world-wide financial system? Check.
    • increasing likelihood of war? Check.
    • threathening even the continuity of human civilization? Check.
    • threathening the capability to compete on national scales if the change is not reponded to swiftly by governments? Check.
    • Correlated with obscene amounts of wealth concentration, impoverishing the huge majority of people, and disintegrating societies? Check.

    It's as if AI is used as a distraction. Like the "accusation in a mirror" pattern.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago (3 children)

    What I find most damning isn't that the mentally ill ruling class doesn't care about us peasants. It's their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring. Why the fuck are these people bringing new life to the planet they're actively racing to destroy? Genuinely mind-boggling.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] [S] 2 points 2 months ago (2 children)

    It’s their utter disregard for the future of their own offspring.

    Also disregard for our living planet and all life on it. Which is, take note, the only place we know in the universe that life exists there.

    It is not only a cult - it is a death cult.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago (1 child)

    I actually don't find that surprising as much. They will be dead by the time the worst shit hits the fan. Right now their money can still buy them comfort, so all they care about is their sick little games. However, their children and grandchildren will be cooking like the rest of us.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 28 points 2 months ago

    Slop machines that make everything horrendously expensive or self-preservation? Hmmmm. I know which I would choose.

  • source
  • [–] 25 points 2 months ago

    If only all choices were this easy! Choosing between AI and climate goals is like choosing between a shit sandwich with a side of barbed wire spaghetti vs a gourmet meal.

  • source
  • [–] 22 points 2 months ago*

    Ez choice, as long as you're not corrupted and evil

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 2 months ago*

    Give the planet over to a probability matrix which is based on the collective works of lifeforms (us) who require that planet to survive...

    OR choose to keep surviving and creating your own works, on that planet.

  • source
  • [–] 10 points 2 months ago

    Just for my synapses, currently fried under this heat dome, the question boils down to this: would I rather suffer a bit more for the sake of AI, or for the prospect that things might actually get better on this planet again? So, it’s a straight-up choice between selfishness and the collective good - and well, we know just how brilliantly those kinds of questions work out for our species :/

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 2 months ago

    They may have overplayed their hand.

  • source
  • [–] 8 points 2 months ago

    such a hard choice... /s

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Ok, but think about all the profits the ai companies are making, and all the tax revenue they will pay to fund healthcare, social security and public schools! /s

  • source
  • [–] 7 points 2 months ago

    Well, alright πŸ˜ƒ

  • source
  • [–] 6 points 2 months ago
    [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    Both may be possible if the production of hardware, services and electricity can be performed ecologically meaningful.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 2 months ago

    I think the choice is obvious

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 2 months ago

    It doesn't matter. All available resources will be put into AI. The location of the data centers doesn't matter, the internet provides access. It can only be avoided by actively prohibiting it globally. But the nations don't look as if they would be ready to cooperate.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 2 months ago

    how much time do we have to spend in this era of AI evolution, where tf is the reset button and why hide it ffs

  • source