86

The index used the responses from multiple questions to place Americans into three categories depending on their access to quality care and ability to pay for care and medicine. In the new data, 49% of U.S. adults were considered “cost secure,” meaning that they had access both to high-quality, affordable care and they had recently been able to afford the care and medicine they needed. In 2021, when the measurement began, 56% of U.S. adults were “cost secure.” That rose to 61% in 2022 but has been falling ever since.

Younger adults, older adults and women were among several groups of Americans that saw drops in healthcare affordability and access in 2025, according to the findings.

top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago

pikachu_face.jpg

[-] Bakkoda@lemmy.world 5 points 1 week ago

Wait you guys have high quality healthcare?

[-] zbyte64@awful.systems 1 points 1 week ago

The best money can buy, for some categories

[-] kibblebits@quokk.au 5 points 1 week ago

I’m hopeful by my emigration will be complete by the end of July. Fuck you all. (Not you, of course)

[-] Zier@fedia.io 4 points 1 week ago

fuck private healthcare. we need public affordable healthcare.

[-] A_norny_mousse@piefed.zip 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

And in this system, "can afford" means "get". Less than half of the US population securely get healthcare. And that's not a new thing. 56% isn't much better.

(tbh I have no idea what "high-quality" signifies)

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Pretty sure you could get that number by looking at how many people use cobra, which is basically nobody. Aca open market without subsidies is also basically completely unaffordable unless you need it for an autoimmune disease or cancer, at which point it feels like you're being taken advantage of, because you are. Then you get a denial on a surgery and really start to understand that killing you is a good business move and the actual purpose of such a horrible system becomes impossible to ignore.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2026
86 points (100.0% liked)

politics

30202 readers
2238 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS