163
all 16 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 57 points 1 month ago

He probably had a girlfriend from out of town that nobody knew in highschool.

[-] KingGordon@lemmy.world 28 points 1 month ago

“She Canadian! You cant meet her.”

[-] newthrowaway20@lemmy.world 50 points 1 month ago

If you can't prove it, then you have no argument and you're just pounding your fist on the table. Typical Republican strategy.

[-] krashmo@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

That would be a problem for them if their voters were asking for proof, but they aren't.

[-] Lasherz12@lemmy.world 21 points 1 month ago

Johnson's arguments are so bad he doesn't even make any. Every single right wing stooge at the top understands the demographics of vote by mail, we've just normalized treason and lying. SCOTUS is the only legislator they need.

[-] Godric@lemmy.world 20 points 1 month ago

"Can I see the evidence"

"No"

[-] resipsaloquitur@lemmy.cafe 14 points 1 month ago

Keep it up. California is tired of the red state dead weight.

[-] runiq@feddit.org 14 points 1 month ago
[-] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

Fucking same.

[-] artyom@piefed.social 13 points 1 month ago

I mean just insisting without evidence worked during the last election, so why not this one?

[-] NM_Gringo@lemmy.world 10 points 1 month ago

There's way more evidence Mikey Johnson has a GRINDR profile than there is of California election fraud.

[-] DarkFuture@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

Denigrating a nation's democratic electoral institutions without providing proof should be punishable by death.

[-] Etterra@discuss.online 3 points 1 month ago

This logic makes sense when viewed through a religious fundamentalist mindset. For sane people it's fucking nonsense.

[-] santa@sh.itjust.works 2 points 1 month ago

Pound the sand little man…

this post was submitted on 11 Jun 2026
163 points (99.4% liked)

politics

30534 readers
2787 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS