teleporter (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 60 points 3 months ago (16 children)

That is one theory of how teleportation will work. Otherwise, you have a replication machine.

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] 42 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (15 children)

    Star Trek has multiple stories about people being accidentally cloned by the transporter.

    Which implies it is creating a copy.

    Which implies it is destroying the original.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 3 months ago* (11 children)

    In the TNG episode Lonely Among Us, while under the influence of an alien entity, Picard disintegrates himself into a nebula. The crew spend hours trying to get him back and are about to give up, when Troi senses Picard's disembodied presence nearby, and they are able to reconstitute his body from the transporter buffer, reuniting it with his mental energy.

    So Star Trek has effectively confirmed the scientific existence of the soul, and the fact that it exists independently of the body, and that the soul can continue to exist without the body, and that the transporter can transport the soul without destroying it. So, no, the transporter is not a suicide machine.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (8 children)

    has effectively confirmed the scientific existence of the soul

    Not at all, it's fiction.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Yes, they confirmed the objective existence of the soul within the context of their fictional universe, alongside faster than light travel, time travel, accessible parallel universes, stable wormholes, hand-held weapons that can vaporize a human being, and artificial general intelligence.

    On the scale of science fiction hardness, Star Trek is somewhere between warm jello and cotton candy.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • load more comments (2 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 35 points 3 months ago (4 children)
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (19 children)
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Never bought into the whole, "sleep is the same thing," argument. There's no period during which your brain functions cease during sleep. They slow during non-REM sleep, then reach near waking levels once you enter REM, but they never end. That's not remotely like having your entire body disassembled at molecular level and rebuilt somewhere else. One is essentially like a computer that's screen has gone idle while it performs background tasks. The other is like transferring all of your files to a new computer and then throwing the original into a woodchipper.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (5 children)

    Conciousness, what makes you, you, is not your brain functions. A "braindead" person usually still has a functioning part of the brain that regulates heartbeat. But the parts that are required for conciousness are gone.

    The point behind the sleep analogy isn't that everything shuts down as in death, but your conciousness shuts down. It's more like a computer that has suspended it's processes to disk (aka hibernated) but then went into low-power mode instead of powering off completely. You can wake it back up and it restart these processes. You could even buy a new computer identical to the old one, copy the hard drive over bit by bit and have the new computer launch all the old processes. Are they then the same processes or different ones? A calculation that was suspended will pick up where it left of after all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Conciousness, what makes you, you, is not your brain functions.

    This is an extremely debatable assertion that scientists and philosophers will still be debating long after you and I are dead, but empirically, the evidence is pointing towards, "No, your consciousness is just a byproduct of that lump of meat in your skull." Phineas Gage, for example, discovered that a huge portion of what made him, him was actually his left-frontal lobe.

    We could argue about conciousness, the soul, and the ship of theses for hours, and it would all still be opinion, but what is not opinion is this; your consciousness is being run on meat hardware, physical damage to or a chemical imbalance in that hardware will effect your consciousness, and it is constantly running processes, even when in sleep mode, until it is permanently shutdown. Based on that information, I would not let anyone disintegrate my brain, even if fhey reassembled it perfectly.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (10 replies)
    [–] 25 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    my personal opinion is that instant (i.e. arbitrarily close to speed of light) teleportation machines could be built in theory, but doing so is really expensive and there's just no economical reason to do so.

    for example, for fast travel, we already have aircraft and rockets. Yet nobody would use them to ship objects produced in china to europe, e.g. cars, if there's no time-critical component (i.e. food that spoils very quickly etc.). So the fastest way of travel is typically also the most expensive one, while cheaper modes of transport take more time.

    Then, you can think of a teleportation device as a mode of transport where the speed approaches the speed of light. If our previous experience is anything to go by, that means that the cost of transport would increase enormously, and thus practically nobody would use it anyways. So that's the practical side to this thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Explicitly don't work like that, the Transporter Problem Thought Experiment was "what if they worked like that"

    But in Star Trek it's a streaming connection, kept in the Transporter Buffer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago
    [–] 19 points 3 months ago

    "the prestige: intensifies

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago (3 children)
    $me = "🧍"; 
    $stillMe = & $me; 
    unset($me);
    print($stillMe); // wohoo, teleportation rocks!!!
    
    $me = "🧍"; 
    $copyOfMe = $me; 
    unset($me); // πŸ’€ this sucks!!!
    print($copyOfMe); // wait, what happened?
    
  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    the reference never changed position in memory, so nothing actually happened during the teleportation process other than a re-labelling.

    For real teleportation, that memory has to physically change position. I would do it gradually though, bit-by-bit, synchronized, and very fast.

    The idea is that if you slow it down, you witness half-yourself getting destroyed exactly as you witness your other half getting created, with the only carry-over being a single 1 or a 0

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago* (5 children)

    Arent we kinda new every micromoment? I mean, the electrons powering our feelings and deeds are new every moment in time. The atoms we are made of are exchanged over time so we arent even the same matter after x many years... So we are never who we were before. Dying seems to be a part of living, not just the end...

    Edit: even the Information saved in our bain change over time, they get more. And remembering things isnt correct every time so even the quality of information changes...

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    what is this prestige that everyone keeps talking about?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 32 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (7 children)

    The Prestige is a movie where Wolverine and Batman fight in a battle of who is the best magician. David Bowie makes a teleportation machine for Logan to teleport across the entire theater to the shock of the audience.

    Tap for spoilerBut we learn that the machine is not a teleporter, but a distance copier--the original Logan still remains on the pad while his copy stands across the expanse, beaming triumphantly down on the amazed audience. Logan rigs a trap door for his original self to fall through and drown every night, and every night, he never knows if he will be the one to die or the one to live.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    Reading this was better than the actual movie.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago

    bad taste in decoration, i guess. lmao

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Atomic teleportation where a pattern or parts are converted or reassembled = death

    Quantum teleportation where particles exist in multiple locations states before collapsing into one… not so sure.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    My theory is that the being who created the totems is borrowing the power of each soul's death and using that to recreate their body on the other side. There must be some minor difference in power that this being collects for itself. Even a small difference would be worth it at scale.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    load more comments
    view more: next β€Ί