teleporter (thelemmy.club)
submitted 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) by to c/comicstrips@lemmy.world
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 25 points 3 months ago (9 children)
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (3 children)
  • [–] [S] 6 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    my personal opinion is that instant (i.e. arbitrarily close to speed of light) teleportation machines could be built in theory, but doing so is really expensive and there's just no economical reason to do so.

    for example, for fast travel, we already have aircraft and rockets. Yet nobody would use them to ship objects produced in china to europe, e.g. cars, if there's no time-critical component (i.e. food that spoils very quickly etc.). So the fastest way of travel is typically also the most expensive one, while cheaper modes of transport take more time.

    Then, you can think of a teleportation device as a mode of transport where the speed approaches the speed of light. If our previous experience is anything to go by, that means that the cost of transport would increase enormously, and thus practically nobody would use it anyways. So that's the practical side to this thing.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 3 months ago

    That assumes there's zero economy of scale though, and instant transportation creates instant scaling

    And much of the cost of faster travel is lack of scaling, you can move millions of tonnes in a slow boat to China, but only at most a tonne in the superfast jet to China

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    Explicitly don't work like that, the Transporter Problem Thought Experiment was "what if they worked like that"

    But in Star Trek it's a streaming connection, kept in the Transporter Buffer

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Ok, then explain Thomas Riker

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

    Transporter Buffer Error caused by trying to do a workaround for inability to get a lock on due to interference.

    An unusual distortion field meant the Potemkin had difficulty beaming him up. A second confinement beam was initiated to overcome these difficulties, with the intent of reintegrating the two beams in the transporter buffer. This was unnecessary, as only one beam was successful at transporting Riker; the modulation of the distortion caused the second beam to be reflected back down to the surface, materializing the two Rikers, one on the ship, and one on the planet's surface.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments