58
top 14 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] reddig33@lemmy.world 36 points 1 month ago

Don’t depend on other nations for your energy. See also: OPEC, Strait of Hormuz.

[-] truthfultemporarily@feddit.org 9 points 1 month ago

Also the Russians could cut the cable.

[-] SudoBauer@feddit.org 2 points 1 month ago

Surely the Russians would never think about sabotaging critical infrastructure.

[-] becausechemistry@piefed.social 17 points 1 month ago

The article doesn’t mention losses due to super long transmission lines. Like sure you can generate a kajillion watts of electricity in Algeria but if you can’t charge a cell phone with it once it makes it to Madrid then who cares?

[-] jgjl@discuss.tchncs.de 14 points 1 month ago
[-] becausechemistry@piefed.social 4 points 1 month ago

3.5% per 1000 km

Okay wow, that’s not bad! TIL.

[-] ExLisper@lemmy.curiana.net 6 points 1 month ago

There already is underwater power line between Spain and Morocco. From what I remember Morocco is still not generating enough solar power for this to make sense so it was mainly used to import electricity from coal. It is basically exporting carbon emissions to Africa. I think it's not that useful because you can already install solar panels in Spain so there's not much incentive to move it outside of EU.

There are also plans to create another like from Egypt I think but the distance makes it more problematic.

[-] Hiro8811@lemmy.world 3 points 1 month ago

There's a incentive and that is efficiency but probably the security risk would be too high

[-] gabelstapler@feddit.org 5 points 1 month ago

I remember the name Desertec, which planned the same thing some 20 years ago. But even back then the main issues were the need for a long HV transmission line and the political instability in northern Africa.

In the meantime we should have learned that depending on energy from other countries (Russia, middle east) is a disaster waiting to happen.

[-] modus@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago

Now governments are stealing sunlight?

[-] Quantillion@mstdn.io 4 points 1 month ago

@EatingOnions
I'm flabbergasted that they're only coming round to this now.
Africa is the naturally richest continent on the planet & this includes its very under-exploited solar energy resources.

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago

It's nothing new, the only new thing is that the natural resource is sunlight.

[-] SaveTheTuaHawk@lemmy.ca -1 points 1 month ago

Dude...a lot of Africa can't get a clean glass of water.

[-] CactusEcho@piefed.social 2 points 1 month ago

This is the nordstream situation again.

I have better ideas:

  • First they should make it mandatory for governmental and local administration's buildings to have solar in their roof.

  • All the artificial lakes created by gravity dams that produce energy should be partially covered with solar panels.

this post was submitted on 09 Jun 2026
58 points (95.3% liked)

Europe

11634 readers
580 users here now

News and information from Europe 🇪🇺

(Current banner: La Mancha, Spain. Feel free to post submissions for banner images.)

Rules (2024-08-30)

  1. This is an English-language community. Comments should be in English. Posts can link to non-English news sources when providing a full-text translation in the post description. Automated translations are fine, as long as they don't overly distort the content.
  2. No links to misinformation or commercial advertising. When you post outdated/historic articles, add the year of publication to the post title. Infographics must include a source and a year of creation; if possible, also provide a link to the source.
  3. Be kind to each other, and argue in good faith. Don't post direct insults nor disrespectful and condescending comments. Don't troll nor incite hatred. Don't look for novel argumentation strategies at Wikipedia's List of fallacies.
  4. No bigotry, sexism, racism, antisemitism, islamophobia, dehumanization of minorities, or glorification of National Socialism. We follow German law; don't question the statehood of Israel.
  5. Be the signal, not the noise: Strive to post insightful comments. Add "/s" when you're being sarcastic (and don't use it to break rule no. 3).
  6. If you link to paywalled information, please provide also a link to a freely available archived version. Alternatively, try to find a different source.
  7. Light-hearted content, memes, and posts about your European everyday belong in other communities.
  8. Don't evade bans. If we notice ban evasion, that will result in a permanent ban for all the accounts we can associate with you.
  9. No posts linking to speculative reporting about ongoing events with unclear backgrounds. Please wait at least 12 hours. (E.g., do not post breathless reporting on an ongoing terror attack.)
  10. Always provide context with posts: Don't post uncontextualized images or videos, and don't start discussions without giving some context first.

(This list may get expanded as necessary.)

Posts that link to the following sources will be removed

Unless they're the only sources, please also avoid The Sun, Daily Mail, any "thinktank" type organization, and non-Lemmy social media (incl. Substack). Don't link to Twitter directly, instead use xcancel.com. For Reddit, use old:reddit:com

(Lists may get expanded as necessary.)

Ban lengths, etc.

We will use some leeway to decide whether to remove a comment.

If need be, there are also bans: 3 days for lighter offenses, 7 or 14 days for bigger offenses, and permanent bans for people who don't show any willingness to participate productively. If we think the ban reason is obvious, we may not specifically write to you.

If you want to protest a removal or ban, feel free to write privately to the admin that applied the rule (check modlog first to find who was it.)

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS