top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 72 points 3 months ago* (23 children)

Yeah, but also Google Maps sucks massive donkey balls for finding public transit routes.
There's probably a much faster connection available if you use your public transit's own website.

  • source
  • hideshow 23 child comments
  • [–] 69 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    This is again a US only issue I'm afraid. It works great in Europe and Japan.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 26 points 3 months ago (9 children)

    Maybe it changed, but last time I tried it it didn't work well in Germany.
    Granted, our public transport system is pretty complicated.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 9 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    I use it daily an overall it's better than the DB or my local network's app.

    Sometimes it's wrong so I use both. Where it shines is telling me how to get to the right stop and steig. For some reason neither German app will tell me what steig I need and it is a pain.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (6 children)

    It really does suck in Germany. At least in Berlin, Citymapper is the bees knees!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (4 replies)
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 15 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It's absolutely fine in the Netherlands.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

    Nowhere as optimal as 9292 though. And for walking and bicycling, OpenStreetMaps or Komoot or Tourtje are better as well than that Americrap. The latter two are annoying in that you need to make an account, though.

    On top of that, all those I mentioned are much less data hungry than G**gle Maps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    Where I am (seattle), google maps and the king county metro site give the same routes and information. Almost feels like they're talking to the same API considering it gives the same time down to the minute.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 61 points 3 months ago (7 children)

    In Europe I'd take that bet. In America, I'd rather be stuck waiting 3+ hours for public transport than walk along unprotected highways where I could just be knocked down for existing

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Or being bothered by police for walking in a car only zone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    When my husband and I were broke undergrads, we did a lot of walking around our mid-sized college town. We made our way to some pretty non-pedestrian-friendly places in our wanderings.

    Police officers stopped to ask if we were having car trouble or needed a ride on a weekly basis. (Obvs, we're white, which is why we were met with the benefit of the doubt from the local officers instead of suspicion.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Really depends on the details. The delay in public transport is probably waiting for a connection - if it's somewhere pleasant where I can catch lunch/breakfast, then probably take public transport. If I'm on vacation and the walk is through a historic part of town or a scenic hike then probably walk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 50 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Multiple times I've seen NIMBYs vote down light rails and other public transit options. They'll talk about taxes and traffic, but it always boils down to them not wanting "undesirables" having access to their amenities.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 30 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    I get the point, but I'd still rather a 3.5 hour train ride with transfers than a 3.5 hour walk.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 25 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Funny thing is I'm the opposite, so long as it's OKish weather. I prefer the reliability and flexibilty (and exercise).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 27 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 19 points 3 months ago (8 children)
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago (7 children)
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago* (6 children)
    • time spent looking for parking, and time spent walking from the car to the actual destination
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    That's the broken part in a lot of the areas of the US, there is so much parking that you will always find a spot easily and everyone no matter which mode of transit needs to spend time to cross the giant parking lot because that's what is between the road and the store for example.

    I'm lucky I don't live there and only whitnessed the hostility of the infrastructure towards everyone not in a car when I was visiting on holiday.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Not an issue if you avoid downtown.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    It depends where you live. I'm in Europe, and in my case driving to a park (im suburbs, not downtown) with my son was 10min, and cycling was twice as long but with a bike we could go directly to the playground, which was 15 min walk from the park entrance (including taking out the stroller etc) . So, while google maps showed me 10 vs 20 min, i learned it's faster to actually just cycle there.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 12 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Yep for the added cost of just one more minute I would totally opt for the more exercise healthier option. But three and a half hours is a heckuva a long time for either option.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 10 points 3 months ago

    something something freedom i think. its your choice... umm... have it your way--no wait thats burger king...

    whatever- takes bus and arrives in 20 mins

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    YABA DABA DOOOOOOOO

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Looks like London buses at rush hour

  • source
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    Jesus Christ I'm in the US and it isn't like that here. Where is that? That's ridiculous.

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago

    Thats how it is for me since you have to take multiple buses or the train then bus from home to work. I had planned on taking the train like I used to but since work moved a bit, the tracks sort of start to drift away from the location of my job, so Id have to then take some buses. the worst part is the earliest train is about an hour after I like to be at work, and the last train home would mean I wouldnt be able to work a full 8 hour shift before Id have to leave to catch the bus to get to the station

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 4 points 3 months ago

    Yeah, but what that doesn't tell you is that if you actually walk that, you won't be alive at the end of the day anymore and with transit you have at least a standing chance, if you try hard.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›