you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 61 points 3 months ago (7 children)

In Europe I'd take that bet. In America, I'd rather be stuck waiting 3+ hours for public transport than walk along unprotected highways where I could just be knocked down for existing

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 24 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Or being bothered by police for walking in a car only zone.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago

    When my husband and I were broke undergrads, we did a lot of walking around our mid-sized college town. We made our way to some pretty non-pedestrian-friendly places in our wanderings.

    Police officers stopped to ask if we were having car trouble or needed a ride on a weekly basis. (Obvs, we're white, which is why we were met with the benefit of the doubt from the local officers instead of suspicion.)

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 11 points 3 months ago

    Really depends on the details. The delay in public transport is probably waiting for a connection - if it's somewhere pleasant where I can catch lunch/breakfast, then probably take public transport. If I'm on vacation and the walk is through a historic part of town or a scenic hike then probably walk.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    You'd walk for three and a half hours?!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments