An interesting deep-dive into how Google profiles and values different users.

It highlights that even though the service is "free", the sheer value each user holds to Google from their data and ad-revenue. And with that, the impact you can have by leaving them.

If you haven't already switched, you can check out the guide below to get started:

https://purchasewithpurpose.io/

all 40 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 18 points 4 months ago (19 children)

How? Where is that money coming from.

  • source
  • hideshow 19 child comments
  • [–] 38 points 4 months ago (15 children)

    Your personal data and your attention (advertisements). Those two things are the cornerstone of how big tech makes their money

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 15 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    I thought most ads are pay per click. We have to train people not to click on ads.

    We actually learned that when I grew up. Don't click on random stuff the internet shows you. Click on what you are looking for, not what is shown to you, it might be a virus.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] -18 points 4 months ago (13 children)

    I have spent zero dollars on things that were advertised to me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago

    It's an average. Some people are going to bring it down, some people bring it up. I take a certain pride in doing my best to bring it down, but at the end of the day living in a capitalist hellscape, you have to concede it's going to get you at least a little.

    Because it's not just clicking on sponsored Google links. You may never directly buy something sponsored, but by giving them your data, you give them demographic information to find people like you that might be more prone to clicking links, and that helps.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 17 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    That doesn’t matter. It costs money for companies to place adds with Google. That money goes directly to them regardless of whether or not you make a purchase. They then make use of their vast data resources to target people with said ads, which may not affect you, but definitely pushes products (some business people have described a 3x on investment with Google and Facebook ads).

    Because Google ads are on nearly every website, and because Google owns such a large bevy of services including search, YouTube, Gmail, and maps, they can collect all of this data into a scarily accurate profile of your behavior, interests, and beliefs. Data that is shared with their partners and ends up all over the internet.

  • source
  • parent
  • [+] 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)
  • [–] -3 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    I don't even have that amount of money to spend, you can argue if it's truly zero or not but I don't remember buying anything on an advert so far. Sometimes seen adverts for things I already bought and have no intention to buy again as I already have it.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    You don't have to buy directly from the advert for it to be beneficial to the advertiser.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 0 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    But I don't even buy their products at all

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    I think @Balex@lemmy.world means that all Google cares about is the ads getting served to you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    The money to pay for that must come from somewhere though. There is no way at all that anyone could be getting even remotely close to that value out of me.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (2 children)

    Exactly, and even if you bought a few, who the fuck is spending even close to that much a year. Advertisers would also have costs to the products they sell beyond just the marketing budget.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    You seem to be misunderstanding the entire premise, I just can't tell if you're doing it on purpose or not. They don't make money from your purchases. To oversimplify everything, they make money when a company pays them to show you an ad. They also make money by watching everything you do and building a profile about you that they then sell to the companies so they can pay Google to show you ads that they think might tempt you the most. There are very complicated metrics running behind the screen that determines how likely the purchases you have made were affected by ads shown to you, whether you clicked on the ads or not. You might think you haven't been affected by ads or made Google $16,000 because you didn't spend $16,000, but that's not how they make money from you.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 4 months ago* (1 child)

    So here's the deal: you pay me out and in return you'll stop tracking me.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    If they want to pay me half I'll turn ads back on.

  • source
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    That's why Pichai tries to kill off anything that threatens its bottom line, such as ending Manifest V2 support for Chrome addons like uBlock Origin.

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    What is the color code on that page supposed to convey?

    I just clicked on "browsers" and found no explanation nor pattern on the color code.

    And no: I won't search for it, this is critique with a question mark not genuine need for answer.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [+] 2 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The "warning red" is supposed to mirror the brand color?

    Because then it would need to be the same color ass the icons. This way it looks like a signal color on top.

    I e. This one, informiak mail is something I clearly should not touch, without ever having heard of them.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [+] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago

    For me: paragraph shapes and colors convey meaning. It's as if someone chose to have a red exclamation mark ‼️ as their logo and uses it inline.

    Without knowing what it is it looks like a call to action.

    Many of these comparison images and pages use color coding to quickly convey information. So I searched for meaning that wasn't there .. .

    In short l: my brain sees "red" and searched what I was warned against.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    thats more money than I made last year so...

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    "Proton analyzed 54,000 profiles..."

    "...We cannot scan emails, build a profile, or sell access to your attention."

    How did they get the 54,000 profiles?

  • source
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    'Proton analyzed over 54,000 demographic profiles using 2025 ad auction data to estimate what advertisers pay to reach different types of Americans. The range is much wider than you might expect." At least read the first Paragraph before asking.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    I read the whole article but it doesn't explain what "ad auction data" means.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    There's basically a marketplace where people who want to sell things bid on advertisement locations. So you may say, "I want to spam 10000 people who have school age children", and you have to compete with other businesses who want to spam the same people.

    While the details are of course proprietary, presumably some data has to be made available to the companies buying ads. So I guess that is what Proton looked at.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Oh, I'm worth a hell of a lot more than that to them

  • source
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Great website, thanks; I've never seen such a thorough email page before.

  • source
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago

    I could use that money back

  • source
  • [–] -5 points 4 months ago

    That's bull.

  • source