top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 122 points 3 months ago (29 children)

We're destroying the environment for this folks

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • load more comments (29 replies)
    [–] 55 points 3 months ago

    This is why the steam deck is $1,000 btw

  • source
  • [–] 36 points 3 months ago (12 children)

    Whenever I see these, I try them out. Sometimes I can reproduce them, this one I can't. However, I remain extremely skeptical and believe that whenever one of these screenshots goes around, someone at LLM Company hard codes a fix for that specific fuck up. Against how many of these hard fixes does each LLM answer get checked nowadays?!

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 33 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    On the very long list of shitty things about AI is the fact that they are non-deterministic.

    I was however able to get this fuckup on first try:

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (4 children)

    I just tried this one and got:

    There are 2 t's in the word colonialism:

    colonialism

    They are located at the end of the word: the t and i at the end of the sequence.

    They usually include some randomness in the responses which is why they don’t always respond the same way (and sometimes will even often but not always get the answer correct, or visa versa).

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago (3 children)

    I am also trying from a non English speaking country, pretty sure that has an impact as well on behavior.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

    That could be, but I think a lot of the models are the same because they can speak many languages pretty well. I’ve had a lot of success with talking to models I normally prompt in English using other languages. But I have also seen Chinese appear unprompted in response to English queries from certain Chinese models a few times.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 child)

    I tried it, and got similiar shorter answers but not the exact same answer. Sometimes it ends up getting it right at the end after fumbling a lot, and sometimes it just fails completely.

    Searching on Google directly sometimes doesn't produce the AI Overview on stuff like these in my experience, but passing the search to Google from DDG with the bang (!g) almost always produces the AI Overview.

    edit: I tried it again and it grew the ability of humor:

    There are 2 't's in the word colonialism. colt-a-ca-l-i-s-m (just kidding) C-o-l-o-n-i-a-l-i-s-m:

    • t = 0 (If you were thinking of colonization, there is still only 1 't' in the word.)

    Interestingly, on one of my attempts it used python to count the number of t's and still ended up getting the "verbal" explanation wrong.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 21 points 3 months ago (1 child)
  • [–] 18 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    It took several tries but I got one that looped. Most of the time it gives the "there are 2" and puts random arrows.

    This used to happen on chatgpt with "Is there a seahorse emoji". Here's a video explaining why this happens.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago (11 children)

    And this shit is "taking people's jobs"

    Hahahahahahahahahahahahahahahaha

  • source
  • hideshow 11 child comments
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago (10 children)
  • [–] 8 points 3 months ago* (8 children)

    Just tested with similar results, output was:

    There are exactly 2 't's in the word 'colonialism'. C-o-l-o-n-i-a-l-i-s-m Would you like to check the spelling or character count of any other words? Let me know!

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
  • [–] 17 points 3 months ago

    "Coloniatism" is my favourite

  • source
  • [–] 14 points 3 months ago
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago
    [–] 10 points 3 months ago (1 child)

    Interestingly, it would probably do a better job of writing a piece of code to count how many T's there are, and then reading output of that.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 6 points 3 months ago

    I'll never tire of LLM aneurysms.

  • source
  • [–] 2 points 3 months ago*

    i seen without "thinking", it tells you if there is 2.
    google's search ai does not have "thinking"
    the looping thing i also seen before.

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›