The Dutch government has blocked the sale of Solvinity, the company that manages its online services portal DigiD, to the US-based tech giant Kyndryl amid concerns that millions of citizens’ private data could be compromised.

all 21 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 97 points 4 months ago (12 children)

Thanks for this! A personal identification service should not be in the hands of a non European company.

  • source
  • hideshow 12 child comments
  • [–] 84 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    Shouldn't be on private companies to begin with

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    Netherlands love to privatise with guardrails. Give the liability to private companies but micro-manage them. It's the same for roads, healthcare, etc.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    The true matter is somewhat nuanced. The company managing it, Logius, is government owned, however they’re using services, hosting and such, from this Solvinity that’s about to be acquired.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 34 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

    Nothing important should be in the hands of USA, China or Russia.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    So what you are saying is that Europe should buy the US personal identification services?

    I mean, it would be funny to have European companies start buying major US companies, enforcing European work standards, vacation, parental leave, less stress, better quality of life.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 7 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 child)

    Some of the German Car companies tried that, in their manufacturing they started in the south of the country(edit, in the south us, carolinas and thereabouts,) politicians bullied them into not giving the workers those things, like Unions, they were willingly trying to implement as is their model.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 29 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I find it difficult to accept that such a critical service is privately owned and operated. I find it completely unacceptable that it was supposed to be owned by Americans. This decision is definitely a positive one.

  • source
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    And a wakeup call that if your information is there, that you make sure you get it wiped ASAP. Because obviously the people running the company see no moral problems with handing over your data to someone else.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    The thing is if you live in the Netherlands you kinda need it. I never knew it’s operated by a private company though, that’s ridiculously dumb.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 1 point 4 months ago (1 child)

    @detren @kungen
    Stunning that anything of this nationwide importance should be anything other than a national asset!
    Same should apply to EVERY essential unique/monopolistic national utility or network (water, electricity, rail, motorway, cable, etc.)

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 4 months ago

    Definitely! After reading the article it’s not THAT bad but it’s still not good. The service is developed and managed by a government company BUT the IT service is outsourced to a private Dutch company that’s owned by a British company. Like what the fuck?

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 13 points 4 months ago
    [+] 12 points 4 months ago
    [–] 5 points 4 months ago*

    "Junior minister" 😅

    Staatssecretaris.

    She is on Mastodon by the way: https://social.overheid.nl/@stasdigi

  • source