top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 104 points 4 months ago* (8 children)

One account on X said: "Ferrari just killed their brand just like Jaguar did. This is straight to the junkyard trash."

"What is going on with European Luxury car manufacturers? First Jaguar and now Ferrari", another account posted.

But not all commentators were felt negatively about the new car, with one post saying: "Absolute masterclass in design. Ferrari just unveiled the breathtaking LUCE concept, and it is a total game changer."

Honestly, BBC, if you're going to aggregate statistics about tweets on Twitter, use it as some kind of crude poll, maybe you could get something useful that way.

But reporting on anecdotes about anonymous tweets for opinion seems of almost zero value from a news standpoint. If a tweet mentioned a fact that you could validate, say, that might have some value.

But what you're doing here is on-par with saying "someone on Twitter said that they liked chocolate ice cream, and someone else said that they didn't like chocolate ice cream". That just doesn't really seem newsworthy. I would say that it'd be surprising if you couldn't find posts of both sorts for virtually any topic.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

    User drolex started to read tal's comment on lemmy and responded with

    lmao tl;dr

    which shows that the range of cerebral capacities of users on the platform is extremely diverse

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 76 points 4 months ago (17 children)

    Like, they just couldn't be bothered to make it good looking?

  • source
  • hideshow 17 child comments
  • [–] 47 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

    The stupidest thing is how Ferrari has historically gone to great lengths to make their cars sleek and pointy despite the need to accommodate big-ass radiators and engine intakes, yet just when using an electric drivetrain makes 'sleek and pointy' easy for them, they come out with this boxy shit instead!

    And even worse, it's a sedan (which Ferrari has never made before). WTF.


    Clearly, what happened here is that the bean-counters insisted that Ferrari needed to diversify into new market segments (both more practical cars and EVs) but somebody at the top hated the idea, so they did it in the most sabotaged, begrudging way possible. They didn't have the courage to make a proper two-seat electric sports car.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 70 points 4 months ago* (7 children)

    The sports car manufacturer's cycle of business:

    1. Lose revenue due to EV competition.
    2. Design EV that looks like a cotton candy/kid's toys version of your other cars.
    3. EV sells poorly.
    4. Scrap EV plans and return to non-EV lineup.
    5. Go back to 1.
  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (6 children)

    I'm genuinely curious about the reliability. I've been lucky enough to own a lot of cars in my life. I will tell you every somewhat modern/modern exotic car I've owned has been an absolute piece of over priced shit beyond "it looks and sounds cool''. I kid you not probably every other time I drove my Lamborghini Aventador with 5k miles some stupid shit would break, radiator hoses, electrical problems, misfires and they all cost stupid amounts of money to fix. While my 2002 Camry has 185k miles with only regular maintenance and I'd feel comfortable driving it across the US.

    I get they're meant to be looked at ect, but if you can't design a radiator hose that lasts over 2 years and 5k miles you've got a serious engineering problem. Hell, I had a 68' mustang that still has the the OEM from the factory before I replaced it and it technically still was fine. Absolutely ridiculous, these things are like a bunch of expensive parts just bolted together like a 2nd grader did it.

    Sorry for the rant. These cars are one of the few things that ligit get me pissed as an automotive lover.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 6 child comments
  • load more comments (6 replies)
  • [–] 60 points 4 months ago (29 children)

    Is it possible to make an EV that doesn't look like a dorks version of a futuristic car? Just make it look normal and people will buy it.

  • source
  • hideshow 29 child comments
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (4 children)

    I feel the I8 doesn’t look bad at all.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
  • [–] 14 points 4 months ago (3 children)

    I am pretty certain this is a hybrid.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 3 child comments
  • [–] 8 points 4 months ago*

    Ferrari execs, probably: "No, we have to make clear that we're modern™ and there's more to our cars than toxic masculinity!!!"

    ... which might even be a good selling point for a lot of people, except for the kind of people who buy a Ferrari.

  • source
  • parent
  • load more comments (14 replies)
    [–] 54 points 4 months ago (18 children)

    The new model departs from the look of typical

    This is why most new EVs fail - they look like EVs rather than just a car.

    BYD EVs look just like normal cars.

  • source
  • hideshow 18 child comments
  • load more comments (5 replies)
    [–] 35 points 4 months ago

    Ferrari unveils first fully electric car

    Not true. Other brands have had fully electric cars way before Ferrari.

    /jk I know what it means, I just read it like this the first time and made me giggle.

  • source
  • [–] 28 points 4 months ago (8 children)

    That's a nice looking Peugeot.

  • source
  • hideshow 8 child comments
  • [–] 23 points 4 months ago*

    Carmakers including Ford and Volkswagen have doubled down on petrol cars, especially in the US, due to...regulatory changes under President Donald Trump, who has cut incentives for EV buyers.

    I'm pretty confident that if you're buying a $640,000 car, you place little relative value on a $7,500 tax credit. It being present or not is under a 1.2% price difference. That particular factor probably isn't very relevant as regards cars like these.

  • source
  • [–] 21 points 4 months ago (5 children)

    Looks boring and generic, you are Ferrari ffs... Give me fins, lasers, cool interiors, fucking something to make it stand out. Who wants this?

    Jaguar did this too, making boring EVs with none of the signature styling that the brand is famous for, and then proceeded to tank.

  • source
  • hideshow 5 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 18 points 4 months ago (7 children)

    What the actual fuck is this

    I love electric cars, prefer them over gasoline, but a Ferrari should look like a Ferrari

    The chassis/vision design concept artist should be moved to a different division....

  • source
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [+] 16 points 4 months ago (6 children)
    load more comments (6 replies)
    [–] 15 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    10/10 would have beckoned Barbie to go celebrating

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 13 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Jony Ive has done the impossible, he made a Ferrari that looks bland. Way to go!

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 10 points 4 months ago

    It looks like an AI interpretation of an Electric Ferrari.

  • source
  • [–] 9 points 4 months ago (2 children)
    load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 9 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    This design is getting slandered, damn. Personally I think it looks absolutely sick, but for a brand like Ferrari I'm not sure it's a good move. It has that electric car look, which makes it seem less exclusive. I'd totally want one if I needed a car and it was actually affordable, but given the price it probably should've looked more exclusive.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 8 points 4 months ago* (2 children)

    Is it just me or is this paragraph confusing as fuck with regards to the time form?

    Ferrari plans to roll out the electric vehicle (EV) after previously ruling out such a move, opting instead to make hybrid cars that are powered by both petrol and electricity.

    My ESL ass would have written it more like this

    Ferrari plans to roll out the electric vehicle (EV) after having previously ruled out such a move. At the time they opted instead to make hybrid cars that are powered by both petrol and electricity.

    Not sure my version is grammatical, but at least you know what's now and what was then.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 4 months ago (2 children)

    This car is not very beautiful, but it looks like interesting for me. Like a car from the future e.g. "ghost in the shell" etc.

    The normal Ferrari design is... boring (every sports car has the same look). This is new and fresh design. Everybody speaks/love/hate it and I think that is a good promotion for Ferrari.

    And the most of car designs are created for fuels engines, but this used e-engines... Smaller and lighter. They doesn't need the old forme anymore and the designer have so new interesting options.

    I think that could borne a new design era. In- and outside.

  • source
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • load more comments (2 replies)
    [–] 6 points 4 months ago (1 child)

    Doesn't look bad to me. The color layout reminds me of Star Trek uniforms.

  • source
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • load more comments (1 reply)
    [–] 5 points 4 months ago

    Looked into it as the photo wasn't that bad but it is fugly. The hanging blue stuff is gonna break the moment the median american reclines on it

  • source
  • load more comments
    view more: next ›