20

I primaried her but she’s too old now. Hope she keeps up the good work though.

top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] Skyrmir@lemmy.world 22 points 4 days ago

She'd be great as Senate Majority leader. Especially if AOC were to take Schumers seat.

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

So you want a female Schumer who will do anything to block true progressive votes? You have no clue who Warren truly is. You must not paid attention in 2016 or 2020 if you think Warren is nothing but a "capitalist to her bones" neo liberal Democrat. Well I wont be fooled but guess you will. If she runs it will be to Stop AOC nothing more. You can take that to the bank.

[-] Jakeroxs@sh.itjust.works 6 points 4 days ago

Will never forgive her for kneecapping Bernie

[-] Fredselfish@lemmy.world 5 points 4 days ago

Yeah fuck that bitch they only courting her because she good at stopping the progressive to move forward. If AOC runs Warren will be there to make sure AOC loses not to win not to help the cause. She a fucking snake and look at the comments in here sipping for Warren already.

Yall are delusional if you think Warren a Republican under Reagan suddenly cares about progressive movement. She always been a decoy helping the Democrats keep true progressive from winning.

So again she will be in primary to take votes away from true left progressive runners. The Dem party want someone like Newsome they pick their horse. The primary are just scam to make it look like they care about Democracy. Hell Republican have cleaner and freer primary then Democrats. And that saying something when Republican cheat in the general elections.

[-] spongebue@lemmy.world 1 points 4 days ago

She may be old but I swear that woman has more energy than me. And I'm in my 30s.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2026
20 points (81.2% liked)

politics

29905 readers
2321 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS