313
top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] lord_ryvan@ttrpg.network 1 points 1 day ago

Where is this data pulled from? Specifically, I'm not buying it that the Netherlands is dark-red.

[-] infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net 75 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

lmao @ new zealand, ig it's better than leaving them off the map entirely

[-] MBech@feddit.dk 39 points 5 days ago

No one knows where New Zealand really is anyway.

Like an above-water Atlantis.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 5 days ago

It's right there in the name: New sea-land

[-] Aaron@lemmy.nz 7 points 5 days ago

Good lol, that's our best defensive option anyway

[-] humble_boatsman@sh.itjust.works 4 points 5 days ago

What happens when Gondor calls for aid?

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

Alaska will- oh, they fell off the edge of the world.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 7 points 5 days ago

I’d be freaked out if I got on the plane out into the Pacific and it just wasn’t there anymore.

[-] SapphironZA@sh.itjust.works 8 points 5 days ago

COVID also forgot where it was, so its not all bad.

[-] Jack@lemmy.ca 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Don't map makers usually do this with a bordered box with long/lat inside the box? (Or in this case, at least an arrow pointing EbN.)

[-] etherphon@piefed.world 33 points 5 days ago

If he comes to my house in Wisconsin I'll grab him, throw it on the map.

[-] ThunderQueen@lemmy.world 17 points 5 days ago

Its on there already. Just too zoomed out. Special thanks to palantir

[-] etherphon@piefed.world 6 points 5 days ago

😆🕵️

[-] eestileib@lemmy.blahaj.zone 36 points 5 days ago

I have serious doubts about Canada's "absolute readiness" given that Carney is Carney.

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 19 points 5 days ago

It isn't an option. Canada would have to withdraw their support for the ICC, if they were to ignore one of their rulings. Carney can't just decide to do that on his own. It would need to be legislated.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 8 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

Wait so are you saying that ICC rulings are in fact enforced by the judicial branch (like any other arrest warrants) and not the executive? That would be great because I was just about to lament on here that they seem to depend on the willingness of the executive in most countries. Which is the precise reason why we leave law enforcement to a separate branch

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 13 points 5 days ago

It's actually both branches, since law enforcement falls under the executive. Canadian law has been directly aligned with international law for decades. This means that if Netanyahu ever set foot on Canadian soil, the RCMP would be obligated to arrest him.

However, I would assume they would probably hand him over to the Hague for prosecution, rather than try him in Canada...even though they have the legal authority to do so.

[-] Aceticon@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

They would just "forget" about arresting him or purposefully started some kind of long procedural judicial consultation ("something, something, Diplomatic Immunity"), for long enough that Carney had time to properly lick Netanyahu's arse and the latter left Canada.

Following that there would be some theatrical political performances on the theme "we could never imagine this could happen" including some deeply emotional "lessons were learned" at the end for that oh so very special "we're really genuinelly sorry and this will never happens again (until it does)" juice.

[-] geolaw@aus.social 2 points 5 days ago

@Archangel1313 @eestileib There is a big difference between "legislative requirement" and "enthusiastic support"

[-] Archangel1313@lemmy.ca 7 points 5 days ago

My point was that this is not a decision that Carney can make, unilaterally. By law, Canada is obligated to arrest him if he comes to Canada. Which means "Carney being Carney" has nothing to do with it. Canada would have to not only change its domestic laws...they would have to redefine their alignment with international laws.

[-] Bane_Killgrind@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 5 days ago

I'm happy with this. I don't want particular politicians to be able to unilaterally decide on these things.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 25 points 5 days ago

Disappointing grayness in Europe

[-] huppakee@lemmy.world 14 points 5 days ago

Isn't basically all of Africa and Asia supporting his arrest? I feel this map made every country not part of the western world grey, as in 'we dont now the data or don't care about it'.

[-] NigelFrobisher@aussie.zone 11 points 5 days ago

Weird that he’d be totally safe in Iran.

[-] Omgpwnies@lemmy.world 5 points 5 days ago

Realistically, there's likely a diplomatic arrangement that he's given safe passage for negotiations. One might argue, however, that he could be classified as an enemy combatant, and just shot on sight - no arrest needed.

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

I assume the map is excluding all the countries where he'd just instantly be chopped up on sight instead of arrested and handed over to the ICC.

Seriously though, I assume this is only for countries that would enforce the ICC warrant. He's probably a wanted man in lots of countries. In reality this map is actually way redder than this.

[-] Kraiden@piefed.social 12 points 5 days ago

Where is this data from? I seriously doubt NZs current thumb in chief has the stones to remove his tongue from Trumps ass long enough to arrest Netanyahu

[-] saltesc@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago* (last edited 5 days ago)

This is the cool thing about NZ. They're so geographically out of play, they can do/say whatever, geopolitically, without anyone caring.

What's someone gonna do? Go fight them out in the carpark ten blocks away just to get absolutely nothing out of it?

I think the only time they upset someone was when they disallowed bringing nuclear vessels and aircraft into their territory.

USA: "You'll regret that."
NZ: "Meh..."

Three decades on, NZ still just chillin'. No need for the protection of the Pacific fleet lol

[-] I_Has_A_Hat@lemmy.world 4 points 5 days ago

If Denmark is red, then shouldn't Greenland be too?

[-] MrSoup@lemmy.zip 5 points 5 days ago
[-] nimpnin@sopuli.xyz 5 points 5 days ago
[-] Egonallanon@feddit.uk 3 points 5 days ago

What defines absolute readiness in this case? For example I know Starmer said the UK would honour its commitments to the Rome statute and arrest Nehtanyahu if he entered the UK.

[-] SubArcticTundra@lemmy.ml 5 points 5 days ago

Something makes me suspect he'd wriggle out of it if he was to come

[-] ivanafterall@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Is there a bounty? If anyone wants to help, we can split it equally. I promise not to predictably change my mind once we get out deep into the canyon.

[-] LaoiseFu@lemmy.world 1 points 5 days ago

Ireland wouldn't arrest they'd get down on their knees and take a long drunk of water. Pucker up

[-] bold_atlas@lemmy.world 0 points 5 days ago

Don't try to be a hero New Zealand. Wait for back up damn it.

this post was submitted on 24 May 2026
313 points (98.5% liked)

Map Enthusiasts

6156 readers
1 users here now

For the map enthused!

Rules:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS