39
I use both.
i wish raymond would revive its development. i prefer it over noscript because it saves settings per site. just because i allow some third-party scripts on one site doesn't mean i want them running everywhere.
NoScript has that in custom setting.
i see that it does, now, but the ui to do so is basically unusable. ten minutes and a flurry of clicks upon clicks to do what the umatrix ui can do in less than five seconds while displaying everything in one view.
Does it do things like no-op privacy invasive JavaScript API? There are APIs that reveal a whole lot about the device you're running, extensions installed, dark mode active, etc.
Edit: uhhhh, it was archived 5 years ago and hasn't been updated since.
More control is probably useful but I also don't want to deal with more stuff.
Same experience as quoted - I used to use it. Once you have it 'trained' it's good to know the bad stuff is not getting through but it's a pain to maintain and for every new site you visit it takes experimentation to get the right setup.
You really want to share the pain of setup with other privacy people which is how ublock works with its lists I think.