13
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by nerdhd@lemmy.world to c/asklemmy@lemmy.ml

Seriously, I have not been this tilted since the last time I played Brawlhalla and League of Legends.

top 16 comments
sorted by: hot top new old
[-] platypode@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 day ago

Try Go. Chess is at least quick—one mistake in Go and you get to spend the next 20 turns watching the territory you spent half an hour staking out shrivel away to nothing.

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 16 points 1 day ago

For me, chess is one of the least frustrating games to lose in because it's entirely based on the difference between my skill and my opponent's skill. There is no luck involved, so losing is entirely my own fault. And even if I lose, I might have learned something.

What's way more frustrating is games that drag on for hours and then get decided by something that I can't control like an unlucky dice roll or card draw.

[-] whimsy@lemmy.zip 5 points 1 day ago

Very true. But I guess this same thing could cause frustration to people because they would take it personally and feel bad about themselves for losing

[-] dfyx@lemmy.helios42.de 6 points 1 day ago

Well, if someone can't handle losing as a result of their own skill level, chess probably isn't the right game for them. Unless you pick opponents below your own level, you will realistically lose about half of your games and you can't blame it on bad luck. That's part of the game.

[-] whimsy@lemmy.zip 4 points 1 day ago

For sure, I also believe that's how one learns and gets better. But the point was that I could see why someone might be frustrated over losing in chess :)

[-] Korhaka@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 day ago
[-] 404found@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 day ago

I second this. Actually I fifth it because I was the fifth to upvote.

Nothing worse then a never ending game of monopoly where you are losing a slow loss.

[-] shrugs@piefed.social 4 points 23 hours ago

funny thing is: almost everyone is inventing their own rules when playing monopoly. a proper round with the correct rules takes 30-60 mins tops.

[-] vrek@programming.dev 6 points 1 day ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

To give a serious answer... Because you are the only reason you lost. Playing a team game you can blame your partners. In shooters and such you can blame lag. In single player games you can blame the designer for making it too hard.

But in chess, it's you. You could of won if you didn't make that mistake or had a better strategy or saw what the other person plan was earlier. There is no one and nothing else to blame. You caused yourself to lose at the game.

Good news is you can improve yourself with practice. You can learn new strategies. You can improve board vision. You are only limited by how much you practice and study.

One other thing if this applies to you, if you just started on an online chess site like chess.com or lichess.org they don't know your skill level so you go against people at, I think, 1000 elo. That's basically the line between advanced beginner and early intermediate. It's like starting school in 8th grade, you fail the test and they move you down, you fail again and they move you down, you pass this time and end up in 5th grade. After some learning in 5th grade you move up to sixth and where you failed before you are now better and smarter so you pass now. You go up and down regularly but hopefully your long term trend is your ability and rating increases.

[-] solrize@lemmy.ml 4 points 10 hours ago
[-] vrek@programming.dev 2 points 8 hours ago

Fixed, I should of known that as I mostly play on lichess but I just have a bookmark

[-] orenj@leminal.space 3 points 1 day ago

No way lol. Play Omikron the Nomad Soul

[-] PolandIsAStateOfMind@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 hours ago

This is not the game i thought i will ever heard about again

[-] m532@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Mario party 1. Sometimes the game just continuously fucks you over, with chance time, unwinnable minigames, unlucky dice rolls, bowser, etc.

[-] iByteABit@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 day ago

Not at all, if anything it's the least frustrating one. Every defeat gives you something to learn from, whether it was a huge blunder you made or just your general strategy and missed opportunities. It was all a direct result of your playing against your opponents playing, it's probably the most balanced game ever made which makes sense since it's been played for literally centuries.

Other games like League of Legends, or TCGs like Magic or Riftbound for example, are unbelievably more frustrating. In online MOBAs you can just get matched with a team diff you can do absolutely nothing about and just have to wait until defeat losing your time in the process. And in said TCGs skill does play a role but it also has a lot to do with being lucky with your draws, having enough cards in your deck which cost money, or having spent enough time before the game to learn about all the possible cards an opponent could have or all the good combos you can make with your own cards, turning the game from a match of skill to a match of skill, luck, time and money all together.

[-] slazer2au@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

No, I don't get frustrated when I lose.

this post was submitted on 20 May 2026
13 points (84.2% liked)

Asklemmy

54371 readers
291 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy 🔍

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 7 years ago
MODERATORS