woke

By the standards of the 1990s, sure.

lame attempts at fanservice

Not really. McCoy made a very brief appearance in the pilot. But, it wasn't until season 5 where Spock would show up in a pretty major role. Scotty showed up a season later. I wouldn't say there was much fan service at all, given that the TOS crew was mostly all around and available.

giRrL pOwErRr

Hardly. Troi was the most important female character, but she was less important than the Captain, Number One, Data, Chief Engineer Laforge and of course Miles. It was a bit unusual to have a female head of security, but she didn't even last 1 season before being replaced by Worf.

pushes gay agenda

Was there a single gay member of the Enterprise? The only hint at homosexuality I can remember is Riker going for an androgynous person. They even had to make it clear that Tasha Yar wasn't a lesbian by having her fuck a sex robot.

handwavy magic "science"

It's Star Trek...

retconned Klingons to look super weird

The brow ridges showed up in 1979's Star Trek, the Motion Picture. They were a major departure from the TOS design. TNG just kept that design

disabled crew members

Geordi? I suppose. He definitely makes it seem like he's "differently abled" though, because his visor lets him see things that other people can't. But, I suppose they do have some occasions when someone takes his visor and he's completely blind.

The only other one I can think of is Barclay, but that's more neurodivergence than a disability.

unrelentingly woke

You already said that

captain with a goofy hairstyle

Sure

black people everywhere

Laforge and... Guinan? Sure, the actor playing Worf is black, but it's hard to tell anything under all that makeup. There were remarkably few black characters in TNG, if you think about it.

politics politics politics

Yes, it's Star Trek.

Nu trek same as the old trek ( good!)

Hmm, who is the disabled crewmember the greentext is referring to in TNG?

Klingons got retconned in motion picture. Can't blame TNG for that.

I hate nu-trek because beyond the obvious shitty writing, lack of an ensemble cast and true standalone episodes, extremely lame and cheap special effects and just the way it is made (legacy series fitting into a canon rather than actual new events i.e. ENT) - its just very apolitical, bland and not very woke at all. TNG, DS9, ENT - all had real hard hitting stuff to say, stuff thats more relevant now than ever, and is always timeless.

Disco has a nonbinary person just kinda be there, such enthralling commentary, wow! It's almost a self-parody y'know. Picard has the romulan refugee thing be kinda swept under the rug in favour of the ME3 synthetics vs organics vs giant space octopus doohickey plot, and then the 2nd season invents a new alternate universe that doesn't actually seem much different from the future picard itself portrays in the first season.

There will never he anything quite like 'Far Beyond The Stars' in Trek again, sadly. Nor will there be a 'Who Mourns for Morn' for that matter, now we mourn for trek.

That's okay by me though, All Good Things and all that, and especially so because For All Mankind took up the actual woke space sci-fi mantle, unsurprisingly so since it's made by Trek and Expanse alumni like RDM, Menosky, Okudas, Shankar etc.

I would absolutely despise this person irl

LOL ... he isn't wrong.

Also, all the people commenting here that dont get it and didn't read the post.

TNG isn't really known for fan services is it, voyager definitely was, Harry and Kim always getting off with alien space girls or running holodeck swimsuit parties and of course Enterprise had the whole sexy Vulcan plot line, I don't think DS9 really did it too much.